28.01.2015 Views

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the Jews in particular, they were bound by express words to receive<br />

the determination of all hard questions from the priests and judges of<br />

Israel for the time being.*(2) But this is to be understood of the<br />

Jews that were yet unconverted.<br />

-<br />

* Acts, 17. 2, 3<br />

*(2) Deuteronomy, 17<br />

-<br />

For the conversion of the Gentiles, there was no use of alleging the<br />

Scriptures, which they believed not. The Apostles therefore laboured<br />

by reason to confute their idolatry; and that done, to persuade them<br />

to the faith of Christ by their testimony of his life and<br />

resurrection. So that there could not yet be any controversy<br />

concerning the authority to interpret Scripture; seeing no man was<br />

obliged, during his infidelity, to follow any man's interpretation<br />

of any Scripture except his sovereign's interpretation of the laws<br />

of his country.<br />

Let us now consider the conversion itself, and see what there was<br />

therein that could be cause of such an obligation. Men were<br />

converted to no other thing than to the belief of that which the<br />

Apostles preached: and the Apostles preached nothing but that Jesus<br />

was the Christ, that is to say, the King that was to save them and<br />

reign over them eternally in the world to come; and consequently<br />

that he was not dead, but risen again from the dead, and gone up<br />

into heaven, and should come again one day to judge the world (which<br />

also should rise again to be judged), and reward every man according<br />

to his works. None of them preached that himself, or any other<br />

Apostle, was such an interpreter of the Scripture as all that became<br />

Christians ought to take their interpretation for law. For to<br />

interpret the laws is part of the administration of a present kingdom,<br />

which the Apostles had not. They prayed then, and all other pastors<br />

since, "Let thy kingdom come"; and exhorted their converts to obey<br />

their then ethnic princes. The New Testament was not yet published<br />

in one body. Every of the evangelists was interpreter of his own<br />

gospel, and every Apostle of his own epistle; and of the Old Testament<br />

our Saviour himself saith to the Jews, "Search the Scriptures; for<br />

in them ye think to have eternal life, and they are they that<br />

testify of me."* If he had not meant they should interpret them, he<br />

would not have bidden them take thence the proof of his being the<br />

Christ: he would either have interpreted them himself, or referred<br />

them to the interpretation of the priests.<br />

-<br />

* John, 5. 39<br />

-<br />

When a difficulty arose, the Apostles and elders of the Church<br />

assembled themselves together, and determined what should be<br />

preached and taught, and how they should interpret the Scriptures to<br />

the people, but took not from the people the liberty to read and<br />

interpret them to themselves. The Apostles sent diverse letters to the<br />

Churches, and other writings for their instruction; which had been<br />

in vain if they had not allowed them to interpret, that is, to<br />

consider the meaning of them. And as it was in the Apostles' time,<br />

it must be till such time as there should be pastors that could<br />

authorize an interpreter whose interpretation should generally be<br />

stood to: but that could not be till kings were pastors, or pastors<br />

kings.<br />

There be two senses wherein a writing may be said to be canonical:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!