Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of the Jews in particular, they were bound by express words to receive<br />
the determination of all hard questions from the priests and judges of<br />
Israel for the time being.*(2) But this is to be understood of the<br />
Jews that were yet unconverted.<br />
-<br />
* Acts, 17. 2, 3<br />
*(2) Deuteronomy, 17<br />
-<br />
For the conversion of the Gentiles, there was no use of alleging the<br />
Scriptures, which they believed not. The Apostles therefore laboured<br />
by reason to confute their idolatry; and that done, to persuade them<br />
to the faith of Christ by their testimony of his life and<br />
resurrection. So that there could not yet be any controversy<br />
concerning the authority to interpret Scripture; seeing no man was<br />
obliged, during his infidelity, to follow any man's interpretation<br />
of any Scripture except his sovereign's interpretation of the laws<br />
of his country.<br />
Let us now consider the conversion itself, and see what there was<br />
therein that could be cause of such an obligation. Men were<br />
converted to no other thing than to the belief of that which the<br />
Apostles preached: and the Apostles preached nothing but that Jesus<br />
was the Christ, that is to say, the King that was to save them and<br />
reign over them eternally in the world to come; and consequently<br />
that he was not dead, but risen again from the dead, and gone up<br />
into heaven, and should come again one day to judge the world (which<br />
also should rise again to be judged), and reward every man according<br />
to his works. None of them preached that himself, or any other<br />
Apostle, was such an interpreter of the Scripture as all that became<br />
Christians ought to take their interpretation for law. For to<br />
interpret the laws is part of the administration of a present kingdom,<br />
which the Apostles had not. They prayed then, and all other pastors<br />
since, "Let thy kingdom come"; and exhorted their converts to obey<br />
their then ethnic princes. The New Testament was not yet published<br />
in one body. Every of the evangelists was interpreter of his own<br />
gospel, and every Apostle of his own epistle; and of the Old Testament<br />
our Saviour himself saith to the Jews, "Search the Scriptures; for<br />
in them ye think to have eternal life, and they are they that<br />
testify of me."* If he had not meant they should interpret them, he<br />
would not have bidden them take thence the proof of his being the<br />
Christ: he would either have interpreted them himself, or referred<br />
them to the interpretation of the priests.<br />
-<br />
* John, 5. 39<br />
-<br />
When a difficulty arose, the Apostles and elders of the Church<br />
assembled themselves together, and determined what should be<br />
preached and taught, and how they should interpret the Scriptures to<br />
the people, but took not from the people the liberty to read and<br />
interpret them to themselves. The Apostles sent diverse letters to the<br />
Churches, and other writings for their instruction; which had been<br />
in vain if they had not allowed them to interpret, that is, to<br />
consider the meaning of them. And as it was in the Apostles' time,<br />
it must be till such time as there should be pastors that could<br />
authorize an interpreter whose interpretation should generally be<br />
stood to: but that could not be till kings were pastors, or pastors<br />
kings.<br />
There be two senses wherein a writing may be said to be canonical: