28.01.2015 Views

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

most likely it proceeded from the legal ceremony of washing after<br />

leprosy. And for the other sacrament, of eating the Paschal Lamb, it<br />

is manifestly imitated in the sacrament of the Lord's Supper; in which<br />

the breaking of the bread and the pouring out of the wine do keep in<br />

memory our deliverance from the misery of sin by Christ's Passion,<br />

as the eating of the Paschal Lamb kept in memory the deliverance of<br />

the Jews out of the bondage of Egypt. Seeing therefore the authority<br />

of Moses was but subordinate, and he but a lieutenant to God, it<br />

followeth that Christ, whose authority, as man, was to be like that of<br />

Moses, was no more but subordinate to the authority of his Father. The<br />

same is more expressly signified by that that he teacheth us to<br />

pray, "Our Father, let thy kingdom come"; and, "For thine is the<br />

kingdom, the power, and the glory"; and by that it is said that "He<br />

shall come in the glory of his Father"; and by that which St. Paul<br />

saith, "then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the<br />

kingdom to God, even the Father";* and by many other most express<br />

places.<br />

-<br />

* I Corinthians, 15. 24<br />

-<br />

Our Saviour therefore, both in teaching and reigning,<br />

representeth, as Moses did, the person God; which God from that time<br />

forward, but not before, is called the Father; and, being still one<br />

and the same substance, is one person as represented by Moses, and<br />

another person as represented by His Son the Christ. For person<br />

being a relative to a representer, it is consequent to plurality of<br />

representers that there be a plurality of persons, though of one and<br />

the same substance.<br />

CHAPTER XLII<br />

OF POWER ECCLESIASTICAL<br />

-<br />

FOR the understanding of power ecclesiastical, what and in whom it<br />

is, we are to distinguish the time from the ascension of our Saviour<br />

into two parts; one before the conversion of kings and men endued with<br />

sovereign civil power; the other after their conversion. For it was<br />

long after the ascension before any king or civil sovereign embraced<br />

and publicly allowed the teaching of Christian religion.<br />

And for the time between, it is manifest that the power<br />

ecclesiastical was in the Apostles; and after them in such as were<br />

by them ordained to preach the gospel, and to convert men to<br />

Christianity; and to direct them that were converted in the way of<br />

salvation; and after these the power was delivered again to others<br />

by these ordained, and this was done by imposition of hands upon<br />

such as were ordained; by which was signified the giving of the Holy<br />

Spirit, or Spirit of God, to those whom they ordained ministers of<br />

God, to advance His kingdom. So that imposition of hands was nothing<br />

else but the seal of their commission to preach Christ and teach his<br />

doctrine; and the giving of the Holy Ghost by that ceremony of<br />

imposition of hands was an imitation of that which Moses did. For<br />

Moses used the same ceremony to his minister Joshua, as we read,<br />

Deuteronomy, 34. 9, "And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the<br />

spirit of wisdom; for Moses had laid his hands upon him." Our<br />

Saviour therefore between his resurrection and ascension gave his<br />

spirit to the Apostles; first, by breathing on them, and saying,<br />

"Receive ye the Holy Spirit";* and after his ascension by sending down<br />

upon them a "mighty wind, and cloven tongues of fire";*(2) and not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!