Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
exercise, unless he have the other with it: and therefore to the<br />
pastoral power, which he calls spiritual, the supreme power civil is<br />
necessarily annexed; and that thereby he hath a right to change<br />
kingdoms, giving them to one, and taking them from another, when he<br />
shall think it conduces to the salvation of souls.<br />
Before I come to consider the arguments by which he would prove this<br />
doctrine, it will not be amiss to lay open the consequences of it,<br />
that princes and states that have the civil sovereignty in their<br />
several Commonwealths may bethink themselves whether it be<br />
convenient for them, and conducing to the good of their subjects of<br />
whom they are to give an account at the day of judgement, to admit the<br />
same.<br />
When it is said the Pope hath not, in the territories of other<br />
states, the supreme civil power directly, we are to understand he doth<br />
not challenge it, as other civil sovereigns do, from the original<br />
submission thereto of those that are to be governed. For it is<br />
evident, and has already been sufficiently in this treatise<br />
demonstrated, that the right of all sovereigns is derived originally<br />
from the consent of every one of those that are to be governed;<br />
whether they that choose him do it for it for their common defence<br />
against an enemy, as when they agree amongst themselves to appoint a<br />
man or an assembly of men to protect them, or whether they do it to<br />
save their lives, by submission to a conquering enemy. The Pope<br />
therefore, when he disclaimeth the supreme civil power over other<br />
states directly, denieth no more but that his right cometh to him by<br />
that way; he ceaseth not for all that to claim it another way; and<br />
that is, without the consent of them that are to be governed, by a<br />
right given him by God, which he calleth indirectly, in his assumption<br />
to the papacy. But by what way soever he pretend, the power is the<br />
same; and he may, if it be granted to be his right, depose princes and<br />
states, as often as it is for the salvation of souls, that is, as<br />
often as he will: for he claimeth also the sole power to judge whether<br />
it be to the salvation of men's souls, or not. And this is the<br />
doctrine, not only that Bellarmine here, and many other doctors<br />
teach in their sermons and books, but also that some councils have<br />
decreed, and the Popes have accordingly, when the occasion hath served<br />
them, put in practice. For the fourth council of Lateran, held under<br />
Pope Innocent the Third (in the third Chapter, De Haereticis), hath<br />
this canon: "If a king, at the Pope's admonition, do not purge his<br />
kingdom of heretics, and being excommunicate for the same, make not<br />
satisfaction within a year, his subjects are absolved of their<br />
obedience." And the practice hereof hath been seen on diverse<br />
occasions: as in the deposing of Childeric, King of France; in the<br />
translation of the Roman Empire to Charlemagne; in the oppression of<br />
John, King of England; in transferring the kingdom of Navarre; and<br />
of late years, in the league against Henry the Third of France, and in<br />
many more occurrences. I think there be few princes that consider<br />
not this as unjust and inconvenient; but I wish they would all resolve<br />
to be kings or subjects. Men cannot serve two masters. They ought<br />
therefore to ease them, either by holding the reins of government<br />
wholly in their own hands, or by wholly delivering them into the hands<br />
of the Pope, that such men as are willing to be obedient may be<br />
protected in their obedience. For this distinction of temporal and<br />
spiritual power is but words. Power is as really divided, and as<br />
dangerously to all purposes, by sharing with another indirect power,<br />
as with a direct one. But to come now to his arguments.<br />
The first is this, "The civil power is subject to the spiritual: