Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A man that hath practised to speak by drawing in of his breath<br />
(which kind of men in ancient time were called ventriloqui) and so<br />
make the weakness of his voice seem to proceed, not from the weak<br />
impulsion of the organs of speech, but from distance of place, is able<br />
to make very many men believe it is a voice from heaven, whatsoever he<br />
please to tell them. And for a crafty man that hath enquired into<br />
the secrets and familiar confessions that one man ordinarily maketh to<br />
another of his actions and adventures past, to tell them him again<br />
is no hard matter; and yet there be many that by such means as that<br />
obtain the reputation of being conjurers. But it is too long a<br />
business to reckon up the several sorts of those men which the<br />
Greeks called thaumaturgi, that is to say, workers of things<br />
wonderful; and yet these do all they do by their own single dexterity.<br />
But if we look upon the impostures wrought by confederacy, there is<br />
nothing how impossible soever to be done that is impossible to be<br />
believed. For two men conspiring, one to seem lame, the other to<br />
cure him with a charm, will deceive many: but many conspiring, one<br />
to seem lame, another so to cure him, and all the rest to bear<br />
witness, will deceive many more.<br />
In this aptitude of mankind to give too hasty belief to pretended<br />
miracles, there can there can be no better nor I think any other<br />
caution than that which God hath prescribed, first by Moses (as I have<br />
said before in the precedent chapter), in the beginning of the<br />
thirteenth and end of the eighteenth of Deuteronomy; that we take<br />
not any for prophets that teach any other religion than that which<br />
God's lieutenant, which at that time was Moses, hath established;<br />
nor any, though he teach the same religion, whose prediction we do not<br />
see come to pass. Moses therefore in his time, and Aaron and his<br />
successors in their times, and the sovereign governor of God's<br />
people next under God Himself, that is to say, the head of the<br />
Church in all times, are to be consulted what doctrine he hath<br />
established before we give credit to a pretended miracle or prophet.<br />
And when that is done, the thing they pretend to be a miracle, we must<br />
both see it done and use all means possible to consider whether it<br />
be really done; and not only so, but whether it be such as no man<br />
can do the like by his natural power, but that it requires the<br />
immediate hand of God. And in this also we must have recourse to God's<br />
lieutenant, to whom in all doubtful cases we have submitted our<br />
private judgements. For example, if a man pretend that after certain<br />
words spoken over a piece of bread, that presently God hath made it<br />
not bread, but a god, or a man, or both, and nevertheless it looketh<br />
still as like bread as ever it did, there is no reason for any man<br />
to think it really done, nor consequently to fear him till he<br />
enquire of God by his vicar or lieutenant whether it be done or not.<br />
If he say not, then followeth that which Moses, saith "he hath<br />
spoken it presumptuously; thou shalt not fear him."* If he say it is<br />
done, then he is not to contradict it. So also if we see not, but only<br />
hear tell of a miracle, we are to consult the lawful Church; that is<br />
to say, the lawful head thereof, how far we are to give credit to<br />
the relators of it. And this is chiefly the case of men that in<br />
these days live under Christian sovereigns. For in these times I do<br />
not know one man that ever saw any such wondrous work, done by the<br />
charm or at the word or prayer of a man, that a man endued but with<br />
a mediocrity of reason would think supernatural: and the question is<br />
no more whether what we see done be a miracle; whether the miracle<br />
we hear, or read of, were a real work, and not the act of a tongue<br />
or pen; but in plain terms, whether the report be true, or a lie. In