Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Hobbes - Leviathan.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lacedaemonians that subdued them, the thirty tyrants: as also to<br />
call the condition of the people under the democracy, liberty. A<br />
tyrant originally signified no more, simply, but a monarch. But when<br />
afterwards in most parts of Greece that kind of government was<br />
abolished, the name began to signify, not only the thing it did<br />
before, but with it the hatred which the popular states bore towards<br />
it: as also the name of king became odious after the deposing of the<br />
kings in Rome, as being a thing natural to all men to conceive some<br />
great fault to be signified in any attribute that is given in despite,<br />
and to a great enemy. And when the same men shall be displeased with<br />
those that have the administration of the democracy, or aristocracy,<br />
they are not to seek for disgraceful names to express their anger<br />
in; but call readily the one anarchy, and the other oligarchy, or<br />
the tyranny of a few. And that which offendeth the people is no<br />
other thing but that they are governed, not as every one of them would<br />
himself, but as the public representant, be it one man or an<br />
assembly of men, thinks fit; that is, by an arbitrary government:<br />
for which they give evil names to their superiors, never knowing (till<br />
perhaps a little after a civil war) that without such arbitrary<br />
government, such war must be perpetual; and that it is men and arms,<br />
not words and promises, that make the force and power of the laws.<br />
And therefore this is another error of Aristotle's politics, that in<br />
a well-ordered Commonwealth, not men should govern, but the laws. What<br />
man that has his natural senses, though he can neither write nor read,<br />
does not find himself governed by them he fears, and believes can kill<br />
or hurt him when he obeyeth not Or that believes the law can hurt<br />
him; that is, words and paper, without hands and swords of men And<br />
this is of the number of pernicious errors: for they induce men, as<br />
oft as they like not their governors, to adhere to those that call<br />
them tyrants, and to think it lawful to raise war against them: and<br />
yet they are many times cherished from the pulpit, by the clergy.<br />
There is another error in their civil philosophy (which they never<br />
learned of Aristotle, nor Cicero, nor any other of the heathen), to<br />
extend the power of the law, which is the rule of actions only, to the<br />
very thoughts and consciences of men, by examination and inquisition<br />
of what they hold, notwithstanding the conformity of their speech<br />
and actions. By which men are either punished for answering the<br />
truth of their thoughts, or constrained to answer an untruth for<br />
fear of punishment. It is true that the civil magistrate, intending to<br />
employ a minister in the charge of teaching, may enquire of him if<br />
he be content to preach such and such doctrines; and, in case of<br />
refusal, may deny him the employment: but to force him to accuse<br />
himself of opinions, when his actions are not by law forbidden, is<br />
against the law of nature; and especially in them who teach that a man<br />
shall be damned to eternal and extreme torments, if he die in a<br />
false opinion concerning an article of the Christian faith. For who is<br />
there (that knowing there is so great danger in an error) whom the<br />
natural care of himself compelleth not to hazard his soul upon his own<br />
judgement, rather than that of any other man that is unconcerned in<br />
his damnation<br />
For a private man, without the authority of the Commonwealth; that<br />
is to say, without permission from the representant thereof, to<br />
interpret the law by his own spirit, is another error in the politics:<br />
but not drawn from Aristotle, nor from any other of the heathen<br />
philosophers. For none of them deny but that in the power of making<br />
laws is comprehended also the power of explaining them when there is<br />
need. And are not the Scriptures, in all places where they are law,