Final Progress Advisory Panel Report - Knight Program in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Contents Progress Advisory Panel and Sponsors i Executive Summary1 Context 6 The Study Area6 The 2005 Charrette9 The Mid-Course Progress Review11 The Progress Advisory Panel’s Recommendations: The Duluth Creative Corridor13 The Panel Process14 Strategic Challenges and Opportunities23 Panel Recommendations31 Conclusions59 Appendix A: 2005 Charrette Mid-Course Successes62 Appendix B: Progress Advisory Panel Biographical Profiles65 Appendix C: Progress Advisory Panel Schedule68 Appendix D: Duluth Participants in the Progress Advisory Panel Meeting69 Appendix E: Suggested Speaker List72 2
Progress Advisory Panel and Sponsors University of Miami School of Architecture Dr. Charles C. Bohl, Associate Professor and Director, MRED+U Program Natalie Bixby, Senior Administrative Assistant, MRED+U Program Progress Advisory Panel Ken Stapleton, Panel Chair and President of Ken Stapleton and Associates Rick Hall, President of Hall Planning & Engineering, Inc. Peter Musty, Peter Musty LLC Mary Newsom, University of North Carolina Charlotte Urban Institute Jean Scott, Strategies for Livable Communities/SLC, LLC Stuart Sirota, founding principal of TND Planning Group Sponsors City of Duluth Duluth Local Initiatives Support Corporation Greater Downtown Council Contributors Community Opportunity Fund of the Duluth Superior Area Community Foundation Duluth Economic Development Authority Duluth Local Initiatives Support Corporation John S. and James L. Knight Fund of the Duluth Superior Area Community Foundation Minnesota Power In-Kind Services American Institute of Architects Northern Minnesota Chapter Greysolon Plaza by Black Woods LHB Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Sheraton Hotel Duluth School of Architecture Visit Duluth Zeitgeist Arts Center i
Page 1: The Duluth Creative Corridor Progre
Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary In October 2011,
Page 7 and 8: of places are attracting the countr
Page 9 and 10: spectacular shoreline, dramatic top
Page 11 and 12: lation has remained steady (instead
Page 13 and 14: ‣ Distinctive Sense of Place - Th
Page 15 and 16: • Housing and Mixed Use - Tap the
Page 17 and 18: The Progress Advisory Panel’s Rec
Page 19 and 20: Day Two, October 2: The panel began
Page 21 and 22: creating a tool that could be used
Page 23 and 24: • The greater acceptance and grow
Page 25 and 26: side neighborhoods is promising. In
Page 27 and 28: • Duluth City Council adoption of
Page 29 and 30: those populations are relatively sm
Page 31 and 32: Address investor and developer conc
Page 33 and 34: espond to some approaches, and vaca
Page 35 and 36: Panel Recommendations The panel’s
Page 37 and 38: • The temporary formation of a gr
Page 39 and 40: Conduct Regular Market Research Res
Page 41 and 42: include giving strong consideration
Page 43 and 44: Provide for a Variety of Housing Ty
Page 45 and 46: • Conduct regularly updated and
Page 47 and 48: • Expand co-marketing efforts wit
Page 49 and 50: Downtown Is Downtown, Old or New Ca
Page 51 and 52: In other words, if you want to mark
Page 53 and 54:
• For all places (Superior and Mi
Page 55 and 56:
an living culture are among the man
Page 57 and 58:
places, the panel recommends that D
Page 59 and 60:
ment, Neighborhood Housing Services
Page 61 and 62:
• Build an informed grassroots co
Page 63 and 64:
Conclusions Duluth is the right cit
Page 65 and 66:
‣ Leadership - Get institutional
Page 67 and 68:
• Investment in historic properti
Page 69 and 70:
Appendix B: Progress Advisory Panel
Page 71 and 72:
Jean Scott Strategies for Livable C
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix D: Duluth Participants in
Page 75 and 76:
Darlene Marshall, GDC Terry Mattson
show all

Final Progress Advisory Panel Report - Knight Program in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?