29.01.2015 Views

Download PDF Copy - Pemsea

Download PDF Copy - Pemsea

Download PDF Copy - Pemsea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T A S P E C T S<br />

Implications and Recommendations<br />

Marine scientists estimate that roughly 10–30 percent<br />

of each habitat must be fully protected to help sustain<br />

ecosystem functions and services. Moreover, Republic Act<br />

8550 (Philippine Fisheries Code), recommends that at least<br />

15 percent of municipal waters and 25 percent of mangroves<br />

be protected. While the above recommendations are to be<br />

applied per habitat type, in the past, coral reefs have been<br />

given more attention in the establishment and study of MPAs.<br />

Simulation studies of coral reef protected areas in Mabini<br />

and Verde Island based upon current fishing intensity and<br />

condition of fish stocks (MERF/UP/CI-Philippines, 2007)<br />

indicate that larger total areas of fully-protected MPAs and<br />

lower intensity of fishing is needed to sustain reef fish stocks.<br />

Specifically, at least 53 percent and 73 percent of coral reefs<br />

in Mabini and Tingloy, respectively, are recommended for<br />

full protection. Although some individual MPAs in Batangas<br />

are well managed, total marine area protected in Batangas<br />

is only about 7 percent of municipal waters, of which only a<br />

much smaller portion (0.1 percent of municipal waters) is fully<br />

protected from extractive and pollutive activities.<br />

Roughly 10–30 percent of each habitat must be fully<br />

protected to help sustain ecosystem functions<br />

and services.<br />

Moreover, based upon: a) economies of scale with respect<br />

to MPA management and enforcement patrolling costs; and<br />

b) ease of movement of fish between core and fishing areas,<br />

current sizes of fully protected or “no-take” MPAs (core<br />

areas) are quite small. The Philippine MPA Support Network<br />

currently advocates that core areas be no smaller than 20 to<br />

30 ha with at least 50 ha preferred.<br />

The Batangas Province SEMP already includes plans for the<br />

establishment and strengthening of a network of protected<br />

areas. It is thus recommended that the Batangas MPA<br />

Network consider the above recommended minimum sizes<br />

when setting targets for implementation.<br />

Available technical guidelines for terrestrial and cultural<br />

protection must also be considered in setting targets for<br />

those other protected areas.<br />

Habitat Protection, Restoration and Management<br />

Protected areas for coastal habitats and heritage<br />

References<br />

Bautista, G. 2007. The Archeology of Calatagan, Batangas: An Evaluation for the Institution of a Cultural Resource<br />

Management Programme in the Locality.<br />

Marine Environment and Resources Foundation (MERF), University of the Philippines (UP), Conservation International-<br />

Philippines (CI-Philippines). 2007. Completing the Connectivity Cycle for Adaptive Management: Coral Reef<br />

Ecosystem-based MPA Network Management Chain.<br />

Mendoza, Noel. BCRMF Coordinator. Personal Communication. March 2008.<br />

Morales, Luningning. DENR-PENRO. Personal Communication. October 2007.<br />

WWF-Philippines. 2007. Marine Protected Areas in Batangas. Presented during the Joint BBREPC-PSWMB Meeting<br />

in November 2007.<br />

State of the Coasts of Batangas Province<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!