30.01.2015 Views

OECD (2000)

OECD (2000)

OECD (2000)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A1<br />

Relative Size of the School-age Population<br />

demand for post-compulsory education in the years ahead. When populations of<br />

these ages were falling it was relatively easy to expand participation rates − but<br />

can these higher levels now be sustained The countries where the population<br />

of 5-14 year-olds is expected to increase by more than 5 per cent from 1998 year<br />

to 2008 year are Denmark, Luxembourg and Turkey; and whereas Denmark and<br />

Luxembourg currently have a comparatively low proportion of 5-14 year-olds, in<br />

Turkey a comparatively high proportion is expected to grow further.<br />

Among 20-29 year-olds, the typical age-band for tertiary education, a<br />

decline by more than 20 per cent in Denmark, Italy, Japan, Portugal and Spain<br />

will ease the pressure on tertiary spending. In Poland and the United States,<br />

by contrast, the population of 20-29 year-olds is expected to increase by 13 and<br />

10 per cent respectively over the next decade putting considerable pressure<br />

on tertiary education systems. In Poland this pressure is combined with rapidly<br />

growing tertiary enrolment rates. In the early 1990s, Poland faced the second<br />

biggest growth in the <strong>OECD</strong>.<br />

Student demography<br />

is a factor with<br />

a significant influence<br />

on the financial<br />

resources required<br />

for education.<br />

The size of the youth population in a given country shapes the potential<br />

demand for initial education and training. The higher the number of young people,<br />

the greater the potential demand for educational services. Among countries of<br />

comparable wealth, a country with a relatively large youth population would have<br />

to spend a higher percentage of its GDP on education in order to ensure the educational<br />

opportunities that young persons in other countries enjoy. Conversely, if<br />

the relative size of the youth population is smaller, the same country could spend<br />

a lower percentage of its GDP on education and yet achieve similar results.<br />

Chart B1.3A in Indicator B1 shows the effects on educational spending of<br />

differences between countries in the relative size of the youth population. In<br />

Italy, the country with the lowest proportion of 5-29 year-olds, educational<br />

expenditure as a percentage of GDP could be expected to rise by 22 per cent if<br />

the relative size of the youth population in these countries were at the level of<br />

the <strong>OECD</strong> average. In Mexico, by contrast, expenditure on education could be<br />

expected to be 23 per cent lower if the proportions of 5-29 year-olds were at<br />

the level of the <strong>OECD</strong> average. In other words, other things being equal,<br />

Mexico would have to increase its investment in educational institutions in<br />

order to reach <strong>OECD</strong> average spending per student as a percentage of GDP.<br />

DEFINITIONS<br />

Data are derived from<br />

the 1998 <strong>OECD</strong><br />

Demographic Database<br />

and from the World<br />

Education Indicators<br />

Pilot Project. Projections<br />

are based on the UN<br />

Population Database.<br />

Columns 1-3 in Table A1.1 show the percentage of 5-14, 15-19 and 20-29<br />

year-olds in the total population. Columns 4-9 show the change in the sizes of<br />

the populations 5-14, 15-19 and 20-29 years of age over the period 1990-2008.<br />

The changes are expressed as percentages relative to the size of the population<br />

in 1998 (index = 100). The statistics cover residents in the country, regardless<br />

of citizenship and of educational or labour market status. Column 10 shows<br />

the number of students enrolled as a percentage of the employed population<br />

25 to 64 years of age. Chart A1.2 shows the development of the index provided<br />

in columns 4-9 of Table A1.1 over the period 1990-2008.<br />

© <strong>OECD</strong> <strong>2000</strong><br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!