30.01.2015 Views

OECD (2000)

OECD (2000)

OECD (2000)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F1<br />

Mathematics Achievement of Students in the 4th and 8th Grades<br />

time. Some of the differences observed could be caused by other factors, such<br />

as changes in curricular emphases and teaching methods at different grades.<br />

Some of the countries<br />

with a comparatively<br />

low performance at the<br />

4th grade make up for<br />

some of the difference<br />

by the 8th grade…<br />

… while other countries<br />

have good 4th-grade<br />

results but fall behind<br />

by the 8th grade.<br />

Iceland, New Zealand and Norway, whose 4th-grade students perform<br />

particularly poorly in mathematics, are among the countries with the highest<br />

gains over the four years. There are also countries with high performance in<br />

4th-grade mathematics which succeed in extending their advantage through<br />

high gains over the four years – Japan and Korea in particular.<br />

At the other end of the spectrum are countries, such as Ireland and the<br />

United States, which perform well at the 4th grade but which fall behind by the<br />

8th grade. Some of the differences between countries may be explained by differences<br />

in curricular emphases at the respective grades.<br />

DEFINITIONS<br />

The achievement scores are based on tests administered as part of the<br />

Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) that was undertaken<br />

by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational<br />

Achievement (IEA) during the school year 1994/95. The target populations<br />

studied in this indicator refer to students in the higher of the two grades in<br />

which most 9- and 13-year-olds are enrolled. Conventionally, these grades are<br />

referred to as the “4th” and “8th” grades, since in most countries they refer to<br />

the fourth and eighth years of formal schooling. It should be noted that years<br />

of formal schooling vary from country to country and that chronological age<br />

does not necessarily mean that students have had the same amount of formal<br />

schooling. For example, students in Denmark, Norway and Sweden have had<br />

one year less (i.e. seven years) of formal schooling than most of their counterparts<br />

in the 8th grade, while students in England, Scotland and New Zealand<br />

have had one year more (i.e. nine years) of formal schooling (see Table F.1.1).<br />

Countries in Table F1.1 and Chart 1.1 marked with (3) or (4) met the IEA/TIMSS<br />

sampling standards only partially, while those marked with (1) or (2) did not<br />

meet the IEA/TIMSS sampling standards. Annex 3 in the 1997 edition of Education<br />

at a Glance gives further details.<br />

For Table F1.1 and Chart 1.1, 4th-grade average achievement scores and<br />

their standard errors (with the exception of those used for the significance<br />

tests at the 4th grade) are adjusted for each country to fit the 8th-grade<br />

achievement scale. Fifteen of the items in mathematics (15 per cent) were<br />

included in the tests for both Population 1 (9-year-olds in grades 3 and 4) and<br />

Population 2 (13-year-olds in grades 7 and 8). The difference in performance in<br />

these items between the populations was used to estimate the change between<br />

the 4th and the 8th grade. The country means for the 4th grade transformed to<br />

the 8th-grade scale are shown in Table F1.1. The tests for Chart F1.1 on whether<br />

the 4th-grade country means are significantly different from the <strong>OECD</strong> mean are<br />

based on standard errors, which are not adjusted for the linkage between 4th<br />

and 8th grades.<br />

The data are subject to sampling error, which sets a lower limit on the size of<br />

observed differences that can be considered statistically significant. The statistical<br />

tests used to compare country means were conducted using the Bonferroni adjustment<br />

for multiple comparisons at the 5 per cent significance level.<br />

© <strong>OECD</strong> <strong>2000</strong><br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!