04.02.2015 Views

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NETWORK PROBLEMS 307<br />

deterministic durations, an upper bound if they do not, and a lower bound if<br />

we first replace the random variables on the incoming and outgoing arcs by<br />

their means and then apply arc duplication. If there is only one arc in or one<br />

arc out, we take the expectation for that arc, and then apply arc duplication,<br />

observing an overall lower bound.<br />

6.7 Bibliographical Notes<br />

The vocabulary in this chapter is mostly taken from Rockafellar [25], which<br />

also contains an extremely good overview <strong>of</strong> deterministic network problems.<br />

A detailed look at network recourse problem is found in Wallace [28].<br />

The original feasibility results for networks were developed by Gale [10]<br />

and H<strong>of</strong>fman [13]. The stronger versions using connectedness were developed<br />

by Wallace and Wets. The uncapacitated case is given in [31], while the<br />

capacitated case is outlined in [33] (with a pro<strong>of</strong> in [32]). More details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

algorithms in Figures 6 and 7 can also be found in these papers. Similar results<br />

were developed by Prékopa and Boros [23]. See also Kall and Prékopa [14].<br />

As for the LP case, model formulations and infeasibility tests have <strong>of</strong> course<br />

been performed in many contexts apart from ours. In addition to the references<br />

given in Chapter 5, we refer to Greenberg [11, 12] and Chinneck [3].<br />

The piecewise linear upper bound is taken from Wallace [30]. At the very<br />

end <strong>of</strong> our discussion <strong>of</strong> the piecewise linear upper bound, we pointed out that<br />

the solution y ∗ to (5.5) could consist <strong>of</strong> several cycles sharing arcs. A detailed<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> how to pick y ∗ apart, to obtain a conformal realization can be<br />

found in Rockafellar [25], page 476. How to use it in the bound is detailed<br />

in [30]. The bound has been strengthened for pure arc capacity uncertainty<br />

by Frantzeskakis and Powell [8].<br />

Special algorithms for stochastic network problems have also been<br />

developed; see e.g. Qi [24] and Sun et al. [27].<br />

We pointed out at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this chapter that scenario aggregation<br />

(Section 2.6) could be particularly well suited to problems that have network<br />

structure in all periods. This has been utilized by Mulvey and Vladimirou<br />

for financial problems, which can be formulated in a setting <strong>of</strong> generalized<br />

networks. For details see [19, 20]. For a selection <strong>of</strong> papers on financial<br />

problems (not all utilizing network structures), consult Zenios [36, 37], and,<br />

for a specific application, see Dempster and Ireland [5].<br />

The above methods are well suited for parallel processing. This has been<br />

done in Mulvey and Vladimirou [18] and Nielsen and Zenios [21].<br />

Another use <strong>of</strong> network structure to achieve efficient methods is described<br />

in Powell [22] for the vehicle routing problem.<br />

The PERT formulation was introduced by Malcolm et al. [17]. An overview<br />

<strong>of</strong> project scheduling methods can be found in Elmaghraby [7]. A selection <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!