04.02.2015 Views

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING<br />

{<br />

• in IR 1 b − a if a ≤ b,<br />

: µ(I [a,b) )=<br />

0 otherwise,<br />

{<br />

• in IR 2 (b1 − a<br />

: µ(I [a,b) )=<br />

1 )(b 2 − a 2 ) if a ≤ b,<br />

0 otherwise,<br />

{<br />

• in IR 3 (b1 − a<br />

: µ(I [a,b) )=<br />

1 )(b 2 − a 2 )(b 3 − a 3 ) if a ≤ b,<br />

0 otherwise.<br />

Analogously, in general for I [a,b) ⊂ IR k with arbitrary k, wehave<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨<br />

µ(I [a,b) )=<br />

⎪⎩<br />

k∏<br />

(b i − a i ) if a ≤ b<br />

i=1<br />

0 else.<br />

(4.2)<br />

Obviously for a set A that is the disjoint finite union <strong>of</strong> intervals, i.e.<br />

A = ∪ M n=1 I(n) , I (n) being intervals such that I (n) ∩ I (m) = ∅ for n ≠ m,<br />

we define its measure as µ(A) = ∑ M<br />

n=1 µ(I(n) ).Inordertomeasureaset<br />

A that is not just an interval or a finite union <strong>of</strong> disjoint intervals, we may<br />

proceed as follows.<br />

Any finite collection <strong>of</strong> pairwise-disjoint intervals contained in A forms<br />

a packing C <strong>of</strong> A, C being the union <strong>of</strong> those intervals, with a welldefined<br />

measure µ(C) as mentioned above. Analogously, any finite collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> pairwise disjoint intervals, with their union containing A, formsacovering<br />

D <strong>of</strong> A with a well-defined measure µ(D).<br />

Take for example in IR 2 the set<br />

A circ = {(x, y) | x 2 + y 2 ≤ 16, y≥ 0},<br />

i.e. the half-circle illustrated in Figure 8, which also shows a first possible<br />

packing C 1 and covering D 1 . Obviously we learned in high school that the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> A circ is computed as µ(A circ )= 1 2 × π × (radius)2 =25.1327, whereas<br />

we easily compute µ(C 1 )=13.8564 and µ(D 1 ) = 32. If we forgot all our<br />

wisdom from high school, we would only be able to conclude that the measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the half-circle A circ is between 13.8564 and 32. To obtain a more precise<br />

estimate, we can try to improve the packing and the covering in such a way<br />

that the new packing C 2 exhausts more <strong>of</strong> the set A circ and the new covering<br />

D 2 becomes a tighter outer approximation <strong>of</strong> A circ .ThisisshowninFigure9,<br />

for which we get µ(C 2 )=19.9657 and µ(D 2 )=27.9658.<br />

Hence the measure <strong>of</strong> A circ is between 19.9657 and 27.9658. If this is still<br />

not precise enough, we may further improve the packing and covering. For<br />

the half-cirle A circ , it is easily seen that we may determine its measure in this<br />

way with any arbitrary accuracy.<br />

In general, for any closed bounded set A ⊂ IR k , we may try a similar<br />

procedure to measure A. DenotebyC A the set <strong>of</strong> all packings for A and by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!