04.02.2015 Views

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BASIC CONCEPTS 43<br />

However—for finite discrete as well as for continuous distributions—we are<br />

faced with a further problem, which we might discuss for the linear case (i.e.<br />

for stochastic linear programs with fixed recourse (4.16)). By suppP we denote<br />

the support <strong>of</strong> the probability measure P , i.e. the smallest closed set Ξ ⊂ IR k<br />

such that P˜ξ(Ξ) = 1. With the practical interpretation <strong>of</strong> the second-stage<br />

problem as given, for example, in Section 1.3, and assuming that Ξ = suppP˜ξ,<br />

we should expect that for any first-stage decision x ∈ X the compensation<br />

<strong>of</strong> deficiencies in the stochastic constraints is possible whatever ξ ∈ Ξ will be<br />

realized for ˜ξ. In other words, we expect the program<br />

Q(x, ξ) =minq T y<br />

s.t. Wy = h(ξ) − T (ξ)x,<br />

y ≥ 0<br />

⎫<br />

⎬<br />

⎭<br />

(5.3)<br />

to be feasible ∀ξ ∈ Ξ. Depending on the defined recourse matrix W and the<br />

given support Ξ, this need not be true for all first-stage decisions x ∈ X.<br />

Hence it may become necessary to impose—in addition to x ∈ X—further<br />

restrictions on our first-stage decisions called induced constraints. Tobemore<br />

specific, let us assume that Ξ is a (bounded) convex polyhedron, i.e. the convex<br />

hull <strong>of</strong> finitely many points ξ j ∈ Ξ ⊂ IR k :<br />

Ξ=conv{ξ ⎧<br />

1 , ···,ξ r }<br />

⎫<br />

⎨ ∣ ∣∣<br />

r∑ r∑<br />

⎬<br />

=<br />

⎩ ξ ξ = λ j ξ j , λ j =1,λ j ≥ 0 ∀j<br />

⎭ .<br />

j=1<br />

j=1<br />

From the definition <strong>of</strong> a support, it follows that x ∈ IR n allows for a feasible<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> the second-stage program for all ξ ∈ Ξ if and only if this is true<br />

for all ξ j , j =1, ···,r. In other words, the induced first-stage feasibility set<br />

K is given as<br />

K = {x | T (ξ j )x + Wy j = h(ξ j ), y j ≥ 0, j=1, ···,r}.<br />

From this formulation <strong>of</strong> K (which obviously also holds if ˜ξ has a finite discrete<br />

distribution, i.e. Ξ = {ξ 1 , ···,ξ r }), we evidently get the following.<br />

Proposition 1.3 If the support Ξ <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> ˜ξ is either a finite<br />

set or a (bounded) convex polyhedron then the induced first-stage feasibility<br />

set K is a convex polyhedral set. The first-stage decisions are restricted to<br />

x ∈ X ⋂ K.<br />

Example 1.3 Consider the following first-stage feasible set:<br />

X = {x ∈ IR 2 + | x 1 − 2x 2 ≥−4,x 1 +2x 2 ≤ 8, 2x 1 − x 2 ≤ 6}.<br />

For the second-stage constraints choose<br />

( −1 3 5<br />

W =<br />

2 2 2<br />

)<br />

, T(ξ) ≡ T =<br />

( ) 2 3<br />

3 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!