04.02.2015 Views

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

Stochastic Programming - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING<br />

Figure 20 P here is not quasi-concave: P (C) = P ( 1 A + 2 B) = 0, but<br />

3 3<br />

P (A) =P (B) = 1 . 2<br />

in IR 1 every monotone function is easily seen to be quasi-concave, such that<br />

every distribution function <strong>of</strong> a random variable (always being monotonically<br />

increasing) is quasi-concave.But not every probability measure P on IR is<br />

quasi-concave (see Figure 20 for a counterexample).<br />

Hence we stay with the question <strong>of</strong> when a probability measure—or its<br />

distribution function—is quasi-concave. This question was answered first for<br />

the subclass <strong>of</strong> log-concave probability measures, i.e. measures satisfying<br />

P (λS 1 +(1− λ)S 2 ) ≥ P λ (S 1 ) P 1−λ (S 2 )<br />

for all convex S i ∈F and λ ∈ [0, 1]. That the class <strong>of</strong> log-concave measures is<br />

really a subclass <strong>of</strong> the class <strong>of</strong> quasi-concave measures is easily seen.<br />

Lemma 1.2 If P is a log-concave measure on F then P is quasi-concave.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong> Let S i ∈F, i =1, 2, be convex sets such that P (S i ) > 0, i =1, 2<br />

(otherwise there is nothing to prove, since P (S) ≥ 0 ∀S ∈F). By assumption,<br />

for any λ ∈ (0, 1) we have<br />

P (λS 1 +(1− λ)S 2 ) ≥ P λ (S 1 ) P 1−λ (S 2 ).<br />

By the monotonicity <strong>of</strong> the logarithm, it follows that<br />

ln[P (λS 1 +(1− λ)S 2 )] ≥ λ ln[P (S 1 )] + (1 − λ)ln[P (S 2 )]<br />

≥ min{ln[P (S 1 )], ln[P (S 2 )]},

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!