08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

~/Pe.nt>:r lITn. h.7(L T1o:oTl.,:r+.m .. n+. nt' V.. a,,+ ..,hl .. ("",rona ("ro",n .. ll TTn'hr .. ",,,i+.v T+.h .. ".. IILV_<br />

CHEMICAIBFORWEEDINGrorJlM&i!.J<br />

ON MUCKANDUPLANDSOILS<br />

173<br />

, R. D.Sweet, J.e. Cialone, R. HliIorgan<br />

Department of Vegetable Crops,COrneil UlI.iversity<br />

Potatoes are one of the leading inter-tilled crops of the Northeastern<br />

United States. New York is second to Maine in total production. Although the<br />

most concentrated area of production in NewYork is on Long Island, significant<br />

concentrations of production exist in several upstate areas so that in total<br />

there is about the same acreage, currently 44,000, in each region. -<br />

Generally speaking, the Upstate regions have shorter spring and fall<br />

. seasons than Long Island. Consequently, the crop is in the ground for only<br />

three or four months as compared to four to six months 'on Long Island.<br />

Furthermore, weeds such as annual grasses and nutgrass which germinate and grow<br />

Vigorously only at warm temperatures start fairly soon 'after planting in<br />

Ups1,;ate areas, but ~ not start for one or two months after planting on Long<br />

Island. Upstate the potato plant especially on muck grows fairly rapidly and<br />

is likely to provide heavy shade early in the season and continue to prOVide<br />

shade until Just prior to harvest. In contrast, Long Island potatoes start<br />

slOWly and, in addition, are often left in the field a month or two after the<br />

.foliage has been drastically reduced in vigor.<br />

The purpose of these tests was (A) to investigate under Upstate field conditions<br />

the relative merits of selective herbicides which have been previously<br />

reported satisfactory and (B) to evaluate new chemicals for their potent1ai as<br />

selective herbicides. '<br />

Field Testing of Herbicides<br />

COllllllercial fields at two locations, one muck and the other gravelly loam<br />

were chosen as sites for testing the relative merits of several herbicidal"<br />

which had been reported as selective and effective in potato weed control., At<br />

both 10catiotlS treatments were made pre-emergence Imd early post-emergence. In<br />

the pre-emergence treatments, no eultivatiml was given except at hilling. The<br />

other plots were cultivated normally. Post-emergence application was made a week<br />

prior to "lay-by" on the muck, but on the mineral soil 'treating was actU8illy at<br />

lay-by as far as the plots were concerned ewen though the crop was only 1 -' 4<br />

inches tall. On muck, however, the plants were knee-high anda1lllost-'touoli1ng<br />

bet_eli rows. The crop was planted on mineral so11 about May 22 and treated<br />

June 1 at).d June 15. The muck crop was planted May " and treated May 24 and<br />

June 28. There vere four replications with individual plots 3 x 15 feet pl.anted<br />

to one row of crop.<br />

Results of the pre-emergence applications on bOth soils are presented in<br />

table 1. It can be seen from these data that muck so11 greatly reduced the<br />

relative herbicidal effectiveness of several compounds. namely. Hercules 8043,<br />

Dacthal) Zytron.and RobInand ~ F-34. Moderate eduction in herbicidal<br />

effectiveness was noted for T1llam, Hercules 7531 and Dinitro granular and<br />

liquid. Trietazine was inconsistent. On the other hand, CDEC+CDAAwas more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!