08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It might dispel some confusion here to hazard &1'1opinion, shared by<br />

numerous turf specialists, regarding fertilizer usage. - Manydifferent grades<br />

and formulations of fertilizers can be used successfully in a turf management<br />

program. The~e is nQ single grade ,brand, or type that is yet recognized' as<br />

being superior oV4trall. Certain ratios are often given as guides and application<br />

rates are suggested but beyond this it has been Clearly demonstrated- that<br />

dense, vigorous turf can be maintained with many different grades and formulations<br />

of complete fertilizers.<br />

Perhaps it should be made clear also that too much fertilizer can be as<br />

damaging to ~ maintenance program as too little or none at all.<br />

There should be little doubt anymore that cutt£ng height of turfgrasses<br />

is a critical consideration in the management of lawns. Numerous studies have<br />

clearly indicated a close correlation between heig/ltof cut and depth and extent<br />

of rooting. Qoberts and Bredakis .(12), in a rtport from Massachusetts in<br />

1960, reviewed 35 years of root studies. A number of concjusdcns were drawn<br />

on the basis: of these many studies. A very important-one is as followsl<br />

"Regardless of the type of grass under experimentation, clipping or defoliation<br />

at regUlar intervals inhibits the development of new roots in comparison ~th<br />

nonclipped tu;rf. ·Onmost species and strains this reduction in root development<br />

becomes progressively greater as the height is·'lClWered"•<br />

. There are differences in cutting height ·to1erance among the genera,<br />

species or varieties of lawn graScS8s. These have been pretty well detennined<br />

and every article on cutting management suggests minimumcutting heights for<br />

the various grasses. Grasses that are cut consistentJy, shorter than suggested<br />

invariably become weaker and are less able to compete with weeds. In addition<br />

to this,grasses weakened by too clos.e mowing are; 1_" able to tolerate herbicide<br />

treatment. The problems encountered in treating close-cut golf course' ­<br />

turf with herbicides Is a good example.<br />

Another facet of cutting height relates to weed seed germination.<br />

Ught intensity minimumsmust be exceeded before certain weed seeds can<br />

germinate •. T,1'leCOllllllOn crabgrasses, for instance, do' not germinate or grow 11'1'<br />

fairly shaded areu. Keeping the soil surface shaded by maintaining a dense<br />

turf, cut at recommended heights most assuredly aide In reducing the weed<br />

popUlation.<br />

Water usage in turf management is important in +ooeedcontrol. It has been'<br />

very. enlightening to me to see firsthand many clear cases of weed infestation<br />

positively correla~ed with improper water usage. This has been most Clearly'<br />

shown following. the installation of irrigation systems on golf courses and<br />

home.lawns •.. .fQai!3mIi' crabgrass, bentgrass and evetta few of the broad1eaved.<br />

weeds often flourish and gain the ~pperhand within two or three years fo~Xowin9<br />

the install.ation of irrigation systems. This is particuLarly the case whe~<br />

the grass is cut too short, is thin, or the water is 'applied lightly and 'fr$quently.<br />

It is likely that an increased incidence of disease is many timel!;'an'<br />

intermediaryin-re,pect to turf density, water usage and weed population. In.<br />

overly ..wet ..collditions.disease ismClre prevalent and damaging and frequently'<br />

thins the turf open:l:ng it up for invasion by weeds. ' .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!