08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

500<br />

Da1;ejJ01 e~uations<br />

~,a.;t'ollClW&I.,<br />

, . " l r I<br />

,.AMCHEJ{ Research ~t June 20, JulT 24, August 24 "<br />

: "September 29<br />

, 08k., Twrace CCt r·",,· June 20, Ju4r 27, August 24<br />

September 29<br />

~.<br />

',i1~e Valley GCs June 27, JulT 22, ,Ootober 11<br />

./ '"j '.<br />

( r', .i<br />

iThe sp,~.~~f·" ~961 ~,.t~'~:Old and~:~1l)kt\,~he PhUadelphia.',; sr:<br />

area,as. it wasin many other parts of the North... , crabgrass emergence<br />

was two weeks to a month later than usual, and growth after emergence was<br />

very slow until around the middle of June. Muchot the emerged crabgrass<br />

was still in the 2 to 4 leaf ,s'tap,on June let.' _ ,<br />

, ' . Ra:lntallwas constant ,\brR'I,1ghouthe SUJMr· and temperatures were<br />

high enough to t,Cl(Drcontinuous ,prmaxim'lllll emergence of crabgrass. There<br />

..ere no distinct. ~.ods of crabgrNs emergence and growth as is 'lSSualin<br />

our &r84.0.. ,~<br />

\'r<br />

Hhile no n'lllllerical counts of the actual stand of crabgrass per<br />

unit areaw.ereT~to compare~.rstand to previoUs seasons, visual<br />

~uatione .:1ndica:ted.,that the nat'Ol'alcrabgrass iDtestation was much more<br />

uaUom andseV~than in prev:1oul years. Thus, it is possible that in<br />

the past seaso~.;8Il.ef:fective c~cal producing 9Sto 98 per cent control<br />

may have left 10 to 15 crabgrass plants in a 50 to .100 square foot area.<br />

In 1961, on the ,other hand, 95 to9S per cent control of amuoh larger<br />

number ofsp%'out~gC1!E!bgrass seedS!imayhave allowed 50 to 75plants to<br />

develop.in the881lle plot area.' J:<br />

Whentransformed into the visual estimates used in our eva+.ua~ions,<br />

the larger n'lllllberof plants present would greatly reduce apparent contfo.l.i<br />

Thus, a chemical ~ have controlled 50 per cent of the crabgrass plants<br />

actualJ.¥· emerging,bU.t those ~g plants wou14:'beenough to completely<br />

intestthe plots ,and wew~ld8ft;].lIa'te this as' n(j,i,~aren't control.' .,:' ,,'<br />

This probably accounts for the reduced, etleotiveness 'of material's<br />

such as dacthal, zytron and tricalci'lllll arsenate, wh1ch have been consistently<br />

effect~ve :in our, 'tUttt.1t1- previau.::years. Theon1.:j liUlt.erialsproviding _<br />

more than 80 p.. oent· control t~th$., season ·1fMtritluraJ.in at 4,"~ ,<br />

and 8 lb/A and d1lll'opalin at 8 lb/A.<br />

In 1960, salcium propyl arsonate showed IIltcellent tolerance to<br />

established turf and new turf planted before or after application, good<br />

post-emergence activity on crabgrass, and aat:lsfactory seasonal pre-emeraence<br />

crabgrass control.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!