08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62<br />

Du R)nt 326 caused slight early stunting of carrots on muck. However, at<br />

barvest no differences in yield could be noted. In tbe t'WOtests on coarse<br />

sand where only early records we~.btained, 326 caused marked stunting at<br />

three pounds. It was for this reasOn that rates were kept at 1.5 lbs. ma.x1mum<br />

in the sandy !oem test.<br />

Ragweed is a severe pest not controlled by Stoddard Solvent. Tbe t'WO<br />

tests abandoned early, were in fields chosen primarily because of bigh ragweed<br />

population. These tests yielded some data on ragweed control. The follow1nc<br />

materials failed to control tbis pest: Cbloro !PC, Dacthsl, Zytran, Dipropalin<br />

(post-emergence) and Trifiuralin. Du R)nt 326 gave excellent control of<br />

ragweed. Other compounds whicb performed well were J:.pazine and Solan.<br />

In the planting on the sandy loam soil annual grasses were a serious problem.<br />

Ipe.zine and Solan gave only fair control of tbese pests. Du R)nt 326, however,<br />

performed exceedingly well. Tbus for a wide range of weed species on widely<br />

different soils under either pre or post-emergent conditions this chemical was<br />

outstanding.<br />

Nutgrass<br />

Ex,per1ments<br />

The activity of Du Pont 326 and other chemicals was studied at two locations<br />

beavily infested witb nutgrass. The materials were applied pre-planting at botb<br />

locations. At one location they were also applied in the "spike" stage and wben<br />

tbe nutgrass averaged 6 - 8 inches tall. The results of the several tests are<br />

presented in table 2.<br />

Timing bad a pronounced effect on the response of nutgrass to Du R)nt 326.<br />

Pre-plant applications whether on the surface or incorporated gave unsatisfactory<br />

control. Disappointing results were also bad from the "spike" stage applications.<br />

At both of these timings the foliage turned somewhat yellow and early<br />

growtb was slightly retarded. However, after about three weeks tbe nutgrass<br />

foliage returned to a normal color and the plants developed vigorously. When<br />

treated at the taller stage, the foliage turned yellow and gradually became<br />

necrotic. No regrowtb occurred on any 326 plot treated at the 6 - 8 inch stage.<br />

Atrazine performed less satisfactorily at the spike stage than is normally<br />

expected. EPrC, however, was consistently excellent. Dalapon gave widely<br />

different results at tbe two pre-plant locations. Tbe authors do not have any<br />

explanation for the poor early results ~b Dalapon at King Ferry. Generally,<br />

early applications witb Dalapon have givfn results similar to tbose obtained<br />

at Binghamton.<br />

ReSponse of Additional<br />

Crops<br />

In addition to the results already reported Du R)nt 326 was used as an<br />

at -planting treatment in one test on muck, three tests on sandy loam, and in<br />

three tests on stony silt loam. R)tatoes appeared to be tolerant, however, no<br />

post -emergent tests have been conducted on this crop. Other crops including<br />

cucumbers, muskmelons, peas, snap and lima beans, tomatoes, beets and spinach<br />

were either severely damaged or killed at rates needed for weed control. Squasb<br />

were moderately damaged from pre-emergence applications but were killed by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!