Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Replicates DlO 810
I 2.0 0.5
II 1.5 1.0
III 0.5 0.5
IV 0.5 0.5
Treatments
3.0
2.,
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.,
7.0
Above 'Dama~ Area
3., 1.5
1+.; 1.0
2.,· 2.0
9.0' 6.0
7.0
7.0
3.0
10.0
Variation due to material soti~be not signif1pant; due to replication
significant at five per.cent level; and due to material,
rates significant at 0.1 per cent level.
Replicates
I
II
III
IV
Table IV: One Year Sterilization Ratirl$s for Grass in
Damaged Area Below Plots as !Designated in
Table III ,;
!2lQ
8.,
8.,
10.0
: 5.5
SlO
4.0
7.0
6.0
9.0
Treatments
Above Damaged Area
393
MEt
1.5
1.0
2.0
8.0
s64
8.5
10.0
9.0
5.5
Variation due to material source not significant; due to replication
significant at five per cent level; and due to material rates
not significant. .
Table V: One Year Sterilization Ratings for Broadleaf .•
Weeds in Damaged Area Below Plots as Designated
in Table III
Treatments Above Damaged Area
Replicates DlO 810 Dl6 S16 D32 S32 D64
··s64
I 5.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 10.0 8.0 8.,
II 5.0 7.0 8.0' 7.0 7.0 10.0 6.0 10.0
III 7.0 6.0 6., 7.0 9., 7.0 10.0 9.0
IV 10.0 9.0 9., 4.0 6.7 4.5 7.0 5.5
.
Variation due to replication and material sq~rce and material
rates not significant.
Table VI: Second Year Sterilization R~tings for Vegetatilon
in Plots (July 1960) .
Treatment!3
Replicates ID:Q §1Q D16 816 !2.35. 832 D64
I
6 7 6 9 9 9.5 9.,
II 6 8 7 8 8 10 10
~
TTT "i' "i'."i' R ? ? q q.q q.q
864