08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

'j 437<br />

petioles, now elongated,f'ortoed miruature arches above the'L·'.<br />

water; the ,pads overturned and theentire,jplot presented a4"8ddiSh<br />

oast oompared to the surrounding untreated green area.UBy<br />

the end of the first week, the surface supported a tangled mass<br />

of stems, leaves ,and bloa'8dms, whioh stlon:began to deoompoee.<br />

From this point on, deoomposition proceeded slowly, more al",,1y<br />

than in previous years. Whereas the surfaoe of treated a~••<br />

usually had been free of pad. by late JUll,' they were not.tjoee<br />

of pads until August or earl~ September i~ 1961.<br />

In oaves or little bays of area I II" where the waterw&s<br />

qUiet, the 111y pads disappeared more qUickly, as well as mQre<br />

oompletely. In the region of the ohanneL~exposed to win~<br />

and probably a small ourrent, the treatment was not as effe~t~<br />

1ve, and even in september oonsiderable ngmbers of lily pad$;<br />

dotted the surfaoe. Submersed weeds (Utrloularia) responde~<br />

in muoh the same way. They.were reduoe! cr nearly eliminated<br />

in qUiet waters, but not in the deeper and more exposed ohannel<br />

area.!<br />

.-: J t) I<br />

Areas I and II oan be oommented upon'·together. Exoept',ltor<br />

a narrow band olose to shore •. these areas responded suooesst.lly<br />

to tr~atment. By early september the surtace was well olea~edof<br />

111y pads,and the submerged weeds (mostlJ: Utrioularia) had·IQeen<br />

ei tbel" eliminated Qr muoh re(1uced •. Along~:the west shore, a cmos-s,<br />

hornwort, and some water 1111es form an:exoeedingl~ dense b~r.d&r<br />

of 8 feet in wldth. These plants were not eliminated or substantially<br />

reduoed. As fo.r the Potamoge~. it is very diffioult<br />

to judge. InsparElel-y populatedare",s. it seems to di~<br />

appear With treatment, b"t in densely popQtated areas, ther$c<br />

a,ppears to be no reduction lP number of pl&;nts. l<br />

, , j'<br />

One halr of area I r!&j:utlved a seoond.pp110a tion of K~sal<br />

G on July 5, three weeks. afUr the first¥pllcation. Thisn<br />

treatment was made ~in order ,.to test the v1:80Zlof a large pa1i~<br />

of NUpp!r advena whioh had not. beenaffeo'ed by the first appli<br />

ca tion.. By the end at . twoweeks, thepA,ants were dying. ~d<br />

by early September they w8l"'e.-declmated, bu:1l.not oompletely<br />

eliminated.<br />

.I 'r::- i '<br />

It may be oonol1uded that, ln genera1., ~~haea, BrasenM,<br />

and Utr!1oul~rla res,ponded l1uooessfully tOfJLIlithree weedio1i$8<br />

when applied at a oonoentra1iion of 2 ppm. ".No one of the thl"IH<br />

weedloides proved more effeotive than the,-other two. I<br />

The summer of 1961 3,n P:utohesEl Countl:W8,:S hot and humid<br />

With all" temperatures oft.enj,n high 80'.S~; low 90's. FrPm.i:<br />

May 31 - September 20, bottom, tempe;ra tur~-ttd):r- the pond variei1.<br />

with the usual seasonal ~enQ.. Op May 31iot.ne temperature "Joil<br />

a 0001 60 0F, whioh rose sharply during a hot period in early<br />

June to 78 0F. During the AA~terohalfo:r. ~nei .and early JU::LY,<br />

the pond oooled to a conatan t, 74 F, but %?qse",galn by mld.... Ju.iLf<br />

to 80°F. Although no sample~ were taken 1~ AUgust, it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!