08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

304<br />

FACTORSCONTRIBUTING TOTHELOSSOF<br />

AMIBENPHYTCTOXICITY IN SOILS<br />

W.E. Rauser 1 . and cJ.:. S\.iitzer 2<br />

Abstract .3<br />

This study was tindetiaken to det~:rrnine the general<br />

persistence of Amiben (J-amiM-.:2,5-dichlorc:benzoic acid) in sc:l,.;l.,<br />

and the effeot of leaching, rnic·ro-crganisms.,,: and otherfaotors, on<br />

its aotivity. .,<br />

Amiben was used as the triethylamine salt formulation<br />

oontaining two pounds acid equivalent per gallon. Application of<br />

herbicide was made to four 50il types - muc~,sand, clay and.jl.oam ,<br />

Herbioidal aotivity in soil samples was qetermined by using'a<br />

biologioal test based on the dry weight of oat seedlings.<br />

Leaohing stiudd e a wer-e carried out; in glass tubes, 9 in .<br />

by 1 13/16 in. After leaching, the soil vras pushed from the tubes<br />

and sliced into one inch segments which were then tested for<br />

~liben activity.<br />

Amiben applied tqmuck (at 3, 6 o:r;~ Ib/A) and leached<br />

with 2, 5 or $ in ()f water was found to rem~,;in mainly in the.~pper<br />

-,ne inoh layer. The greatest movement dawnt-iard was found with the<br />

highest rate of chemical. Leaching was Independent. of the inj,tial<br />

moLst.une vcont.errt.rof the so i+'. or the volume 0,'water applied.<br />

As little as 2 inc~es of vlat'er wa~I,folJIld to remove<br />

amiben almost completelyfro~ the sand soil whereas almost all of<br />

the applied chemical was found 'an the surface UJ,ch of clay,<br />

regardless of the applied ylat,er-.<br />

"<br />

The direct dependence of the downward movement of<br />

herbicide on the application rate, but not on the applied water,<br />

sugf;ests a mass aotion effeot in \1hich the herbicide was swept<br />

along allowing adsorption on colloid s(')il constituents. Soils<br />

high in colloids (muck) woul.d be expe ct e d to, retain much of the<br />

chemical near the surface wher-eas those containing fe",., colloids<br />

(sand) ',"auld be unable to hold much. Such expectations were'<br />

supported by the data obtained.<br />

Research Officer; Canada Department of AgricultuNe:,<br />

Exper-Lraerrt al, Farm, Scot·t; Saskat chevran ,<br />

Associate Professor, Depar-trnent. of Dota;r.y, Ontario J,gricU:lture<br />

College, Guelph, Ontario.<br />

Paper accepted for publication in 1Jleeds~ The Journal of the<br />

~;1eed 80.ciety of America.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!