Setting new standards - Friends Life
Setting new standards - Friends Life
Setting new standards - Friends Life
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />
IFRS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />
EEV SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION<br />
Notes to the consolidated accounts continued<br />
29. Capital statement continued<br />
Overseas life funds: the available surpluses in FPI and Lombard can be distributed to shareholders subject to meeting the requirements of the<br />
businesses.<br />
Shareholders’ funds: the capital is generally available to meet requirements anywhere in the Group. It remains the intention of management<br />
to ensure that there is adequate capital to exceed the regulatory requirements of the Group’s life and pensions businesses, to meet any net<br />
<strong>new</strong> business strain and to support the Group’s overall credit ratings. FPLP has guaranteed the £300m STICS issued in 2003 and the £500m<br />
STICS issued in 2005 by the Parent Company.<br />
(d) Basis of calculating capital requirements for <strong>Life</strong> & Pensions business<br />
Each <strong>Life</strong> and Pensions company has to hold sufficient capital to meet its regulatory capital requirements.<br />
For the FPLP With-Profits Fund, the capital requirement is the risk capital margin (RCM) which amounts to £220m (2005: £276m). This is<br />
calculated on set criteria of adverse scenarios laid down by the FSA (the market risk scenarios tested are what would happen if property<br />
prices fall by 12.5%, equity prices fall by 20%, corporate bonds spreads increase by 5.23%, fixed interest yields rise 0.81% and persistency<br />
increases by 32.5%). The RCM is based on the asset mix at the year-end and takes into account hedging strategies and the actions<br />
management would take in the event of particular adverse market conditions.<br />
Under the realistic capital methodology, the capital requirement is the higher of the ‘twin peaks’ test of the realistic peak and the regulatory<br />
peak. In FPLP With-Profits Fund, the realistic peak applied in both 2006 and 2005. This has resulted in a With-Profits Insurance Capital<br />
Component (WPICC) of £866m (2005: £639m) required to bring the regulatory peak of £1,475m (2005: £599m) in line with the realistic peak<br />
of £nil (2005: £(40)m). Regulatory reserving rule changes arising from the adoption of PS 06/14 allow the value of future transfers to be<br />
deducted from the WPICC for 2006; this has resulted in a surplus in the FPLP With-Profits Fund, on a regulatory basis, of £609m.<br />
Realistic<br />
Regulatory<br />
2006 2005 2006 2005<br />
£m £m £m £m<br />
Available capital 220 236 Surplus 1,933 1,498<br />
Risk capital margin (220) (276) Long-term Insurance Capital requirements (458) (549)<br />
Resilience capital - (350)<br />
Realistic peak - (40) Regulatory peak 1,475 599<br />
With-Profits Insurance Capital Component (866) (639)<br />
- (40) 609 (40)<br />
The capital cover to meet the regulatory solvency requirement of FPLP’s With-Profits Fund is provided from FPLP’s Non-Profit Fund and<br />
shareholders’ fund, to the extent not met from the With-Profits Fund itself.<br />
For the FPLA closed With-Profits Fund, the capital requirement has been calculated on a regulatory basis in accordance with FSA regulations<br />
at £21m (2005: £17m).<br />
For UK non-participating funds, the relevant capital requirement is the minimum solvency margin determined in accordance with FSA<br />
regulations. This, in total, amounts to £368m (2005: £332m).<br />
For overseas business, local regulatory capital requirements are determined and these amount to £33m (2005: £29m). This is analysed £9m<br />
(2005: £8m) for FPI and £24m (2005: £21m) for Lombard.<br />
142 <strong>Friends</strong> Provident Annual Report & Accounts 2006