25.06.2015 Views

Download full report in pdf format - Natural Resources Institute

Download full report in pdf format - Natural Resources Institute

Download full report in pdf format - Natural Resources Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 Surface water resources<br />

Runoff at the regional and large<br />

watershed scale<br />

Analysis of gaug<strong>in</strong>g data from the Central<br />

Water Commission (CWC) showed that annual<br />

surface runoff, at the macro-watershed or bas<strong>in</strong><br />

scale, is somewhat lower than is often <strong>report</strong>ed<br />

or than accepted wisdom would suggest<br />

(see Table 8). With the exception of one river,<br />

the Kunderu at Alladapalle, the average annual<br />

runoff values are with<strong>in</strong> the range 4-35 mm<br />

which is equivalent to between 0.8 and 7.5% of<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall. The ma<strong>in</strong> reason for the apparent higher<br />

runoff <strong>in</strong> the Kunderu is the fact that this river is<br />

used for <strong>in</strong>ter-bas<strong>in</strong> transfer of Krishna River<br />

water. The relatively low runoff values observed<br />

at most gaug<strong>in</strong>g stations challenge the<br />

widespread assumption that runoff <strong>in</strong> this region<br />

is always <strong>in</strong> the range 30-40% of annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall.<br />

Although significant volumes of water can dra<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>to the Bay of Bengal dur<strong>in</strong>g periods or years<br />

with exceptionally high ra<strong>in</strong>fall, <strong>in</strong> general,<br />

runoff represents a relatively small loss from the<br />

region.<br />

The runoff figures presented <strong>in</strong> Table 8<br />

agree with the low runoff values <strong>report</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

KAWAD Water Audit Report (Batchelor et al.,<br />

2000) for large watersheds. They are also<br />

consistent with the characteristics of the area<br />

(e.g. semi-arid climate, extensive development<br />

of water harvest<strong>in</strong>g structures).<br />

Figure 28 compares annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall and<br />

runoff at the CWC Tadapatri gaug<strong>in</strong>g station<br />

on the Pennar River. This figure shows the<br />

considerable <strong>in</strong>ter-annual variation <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

and surface runoff and that there have been long<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervals of virtually no surface flow dur<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

25 year period (e.g 1990-1996).<br />

Figure 29 compares monthly ra<strong>in</strong>fall and<br />

runoff at Tadapatri. In addition to <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

levels of variability, this figure shows that on<br />

average 80% of annual runoff occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

three months September to November.<br />

In conclusion, the ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts from the<br />

runoff analysis us<strong>in</strong>g CWC data are:<br />

. Throughout southern Andhra Pradesh,<br />

average annual runoff values at the large<br />

watershed scale, <strong>in</strong> the absence of <strong>in</strong>terbas<strong>in</strong><br />

transfers, are <strong>in</strong> the range 1% and<br />

8% of average annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall.<br />

. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall and runoff are extremely variable<br />

both with<strong>in</strong> and between years.<br />

Cop<strong>in</strong>g with seasonality <strong>in</strong> surface water<br />

availability and droughts and floods is<br />

therefore a key issue.<br />

. Although scope for further development<br />

of surface water resources along with<br />

regulation of river flows is possible <strong>in</strong><br />

some areas, the scale of this development<br />

is much lower than suggested by some<br />

GoAP programmes.<br />

Check dam near Golla, Kalyandurg<br />

Table 8. Average runoff and ra<strong>in</strong>fall for<br />

study catchments<br />

River Average Average Average<br />

annual runoff catchment annual runoff<br />

(mm) ra<strong>in</strong>fall (mm) (as % ra<strong>in</strong>fall)<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>nahagari at Amkundi Bridge 6 451 1.3<br />

Vadavathi at Bhupasamudram 4 450 0.8<br />

Hundri at Lakshmipuram 35 468 7.5<br />

Pennar at Nagalamadike 12 573 2.0<br />

Pennar at Tadapatri 28 551 5.0<br />

Chitravathi at S<strong>in</strong>gavaram/ Ellanuru 20 549 3.6<br />

Kunderu at Alladapalle 133 617 21.6<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!