Download full report in pdf format - Natural Resources Institute

ID code
Village Name
Panchayat
response to WSS
Problems
Communi ty
participation in
solving RW SS
problems
Participation by
poor in community
decision making
Participation by
women in
community
decision making
Strong panchayats
and/or community
action
Strong
participation by
the poor
1 Hulikal 25 75 100 100 0 1 0
2 Vitlampalli 15 70 75 75 0 0 0
3 Mallikarjunapall 60 70 90 90 0 0 0
4 Chapiri 80 0 80 80 0 0 0
5 Madhireddipalli 25 80 100 100 0 1 0
6 Chapirithanda 0 100 100 100 1 1 1
7 Mudigal 80 0 85 75 0 0 0
8 Borampalli 100 80 90 50 1 0 0
9 Golla 100 0 100 75 1 1 1
10 Seebai 100 100 100 35 1 1 1
11 Pathacheruvu 100 0 60 0 0 0 0
12 Manirevu 0 75 75 0 0 0 0
13 Obulapuram 80 50 100 0 0 1 0
14 Nusikattala 50 100 100 0 1 1 1
15 Kondapuram 0 0 75 0 0 0 0
16 Kondapurampalli 15 75 80 75 0 0 0
17 Nusikottalathand 80 0 100 75 0 1 0
18 Thimmasamudram 0 0 100 0 0 1 0
19 Mangalakunta 50 0 100 0 0 1 0
20 Kadadarkunta 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Balavenkatapuram 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Pinjirikottala 50 90 100 50 0 1 0
23 Muddinayanampall 50 0 100 0 0 1 0
24 Venkatampalli 90 25 100 0 0 1 0
25 PTRPalli 20 15 65 0 0 0 0
26 Mouthikapuram 95 90 100 50 0 1 0
27 Kaparalapalli 0 65 100 35 0 1 0
28 PTRDiguvaThanda 20 75 80 0 0 0 0
29 PTREguvaThanda 60 100 100 0 1 1 1
30 Varli 90 100 100 25 1 1 1
31 Kodipalli 0 80 100 0 0 1 0
32 Mallipalli 25 100 100 75 1 1 1
33 Thimmaganipalli 100 85 75 35 0 0 0
34 Battuvanipalli 25 100 75 0 1 0 0
35 Ontimidi 25 50 75 35 1 0 0
36 Kurakulathata 100 85 100 30 0 1 0
37 Devadulakonda 50 100 100 0 1 1 1
38 Dodagatta 100 25 25 25 0 0 0
39 GubanaPalli 90 30 65 10 0 0 0
40 Garudapuram 40 50 100 75 1 1 1
Figure 52. Example of decision-support Excel work sheet.
Both tests
Figure 53. Example villages targeted using the decision tree presented in Figure 51
93