HISTORY’S FOGOTTEN BRAVEHEART 137temporarily abandon his mild mannered ways and patient demeanor? What was the danger that he sawin the future for mankind if the leaders of <strong>Israel</strong> were to be permitted to grow in power and in influence?If it is accepted that he held the power of heaven in his hands, then it must be accepted as well that hecould have chosen to be born at any age before or after. What was it about that particular age and aboutthat particular society that was of such importance that he insisted upon being born then? Clearly, hemust have seen something that humanity did not see, something of such seriousness that to delay hisbusiness even a generation would have resulted in dramatic consequences for the future.<strong>The</strong> answer to these questions surrounding the clash of ideologies between Christ and the leadership of<strong>Israel</strong> really are quite simple in their nature, which may explain much of why this answer has beenmissed. This understanding does not hinge on weighty, over-intellectualized arguments that have beenput forth by detractors whose agenda has been to muddy the waters of public understanding. And althoughthe explanation for this clash may come as a surprise to a few, to others however (and most notably to hisideological enemies who today are working feverishly to make the world forget about this war that tookplace) the answer does not come as a surprise at all.“ ‘If we let him continue on like this, everyone will believe in him, and then the Romans will come and take away ourpositions and our nation.’ And Caiphas, the high priest answered them saying ‘Do you not realize that it is betterthat one man die than that the whole nation perish?’” John 11:48-51<strong>Her</strong>e the student of political science can see plainly what were the roots of contention that existed betweenthe peasant carpenter and the ruling classes of <strong>Israel</strong>. And as much as there are those who would try todeny that this contention had political elements to it, nevertheless such an argument falls on its facewhen compared to the facts. Clearly the Sanhedrin had big plans, not the least of which encompassedthrowing off Roman rule and supplanting it with themselves as the commissars of the <strong>Israel</strong>i state whichwould encompass the lands between the Nile and the Euphrates. <strong>In</strong> addition it is plainly revealed thatthey were in a state of panic over the effect of Christ’s teachings, to the point that they were willing toassassinate him in order to prevent their being robbed of the influence they wielded over the Jewishpeople who were the stepping-stones in their ascent to power. What the Sanhedrin had been plottingthrough the medium of religious sentiments, and which was threatened by the message of liberation thatChrist preached was a political system wherein the Pharisees would rule, and fueled by a new code ofethics which elevated the Jewish race to a level of at least de facto superiority over all others. This newsystem of ethics, the embryonic stage of the now codified Babylonian Talmud that forms the lifeblood ofmodern day <strong>Israel</strong>’s political ideology, was the source of Christ’s condemnation of what he famouslyreferred to as the “leaven of the Pharisees.” This mindset, with its altered sense of laws governing rightand wrong, was a theme which he attacked regularly in his mission, characterizing it as a perverse set ofmorals which, by its twists and turns, had “made the law of God of no effect.” It becomes clear then,based upon this passage, how it was that the Sanhedrin viewed Christ and his message of liberation, adepiction that has been carried forth in modern day Judaism and its political twin, Zionism, by the Talmudicdepiction of Jesus as being a man who “seduced Jews under the sponsorship of a foreign, Gentile power.”(Sanhedrin 43a)It is within this context then that one comes to better understand the deeper implications of Christ’sconflict with the leaders of <strong>Israel</strong> in his day, and why such an effort has been made to de-legitimize andde-emphasize it in the present age. This sense of amnesia that has been imposed upon the world, (and inparticular upon the Christian West) may seem to be a trivial matter to the uninterested, but in actuality itholds the fate of humanity in the balance. Put in plain terms, this vital and damning piece of informationthat his enemies are desperately attempting to conceal through their control over the outlets of information
138HISTORY’S FOGOTTEN BRAVEHEARTis the fact that this man, the peasant carpenter from Nazareth, was the founding father of the anti-Zionistmovement which plays so prominently in world events today. He was the first to openly challenge theambitions entertained by the leaders of <strong>Israel</strong> and to expose what was the hellishness of this diabolicallyinspired ideology. Part of his mission over the course of the last three years of his life was to drive a stakeinto the heart of this new malignancy which had recently arrived in the Holy Land, a cancer that, if leftunstopped, would have poisoned the pool of humanity and destroyed the possibility of peace and orderin the world irreparably. <strong>In</strong> short, the first opposition to the ambitions of Zionism did not begin withYassir Arafat, Hamas, Hezb’allah nor the PLO, but rather with a peasant carpenter from the Palestiniantown of Nazareth who recognized the danger that mankind would face in future generations were this<strong>Beast</strong> allowed to grow to maturity. It is for this reason and no other that he was murdered by the warlocksof the Sanhedrin, who evoked by wicked incantation this same curse which threatens to consume theworld today.It is in this light then that it becomes perfectly clear why such a concerted effort is and has been underwayby the Zionist agenda to remove the dignity that is associated with the image of Christ, since it was hewho first opposed these designs in his own time. <strong>In</strong> consideration of the criteria that has been set downby the peddlers of Zionist propaganda today, Christ therefore was the first “terrorist,” the first “anti-Semite,” the first “holocaust denier” and the first “sympathizer of Nazi sentiments,” all accusations whichare leveled at any individual who depicts <strong>Israel</strong>’s past, present, and future in anything less than the mostflattering manner that is demanded by her sympathizers. If he were alive today, re-enacting the veryevents which he authored 2,000 years ago, there is no doubt that just as he was murdered in 33 AD bythese crime lords, by these founding fathers of the gangland ideology known as Zionism, that in likemanner today he would have had his home blown up in a “targeted killing” and all his followers arrestedand tried as terrorists. Short of that, one could expect like cold weather in January that the various groupstied to <strong>Israel</strong>i intelligence (including the ADL, JDL, AIPAC and JINSA) would be mounting public relationscampaigns in order to smear him in exactly the same manner that they did 2,000 years ago, bringing forthfalse witnesses and conjuring up every slanderous accusation that would further their interests in ruininghis credibility.It is no surprise then that discussions concerning this aspect of Christ’s mission have not taken place inrecent years, particularly when the stranglehold over the flow and flavor of information held captive bythe Zionist agenda is considered. As such, through 50 years of daily programming, the role of Christ asthe liberator of humanity from the “leaven of the Pharisees,” (Zionist principles without the official name)has been kept out of the consideration of those living in the West and thus out of the discussion as well.As such, a concerted effort has been undertaken to de-emphasize this political and ideological strugglewhich took place between Christ the freedom fighter and the leadership of <strong>Israel</strong>, while at the same timereplacing it with an image of Christ as an effeminate, quiet, patient individual who only preached peaceand submission to evil men and their designs. It is obvious why this has been done, particularly when itis considered what is to be lost by interested parties were such a discussion to be resurrected. <strong>The</strong> state of<strong>Israel</strong>, the physical embodiment of the same principles of Pharisaical Judaism which Christ challengedand sought to destroy in his time, can only exist through the co-operative efforts, (both in financial andmilitary terms) of a Christian West that has forgotten the roots of its birth. <strong>Israel</strong> and its racist, anti-Gentile, expansionist, hegemonic existence would never have been able to have germinated and nowflourished into the thorny tree that it has become were it not for the delusion under which maniacalChristian Zionists operate, nor without the assistance which has been provided by the complacency ofthe uninterested. Were Christians around the world to suddenly come to embrace the idea that Christwas the William Wallace of Palestine, seeking to free a captive humanity from the deadly, tyrannical gripof the Zionist agenda which is today attempting the same, the game would be up, and the <strong>Beast</strong> would
- Page 2 and 3:
No BeautyIn The BeastMARK GLENNJTB
- Page 4 and 5:
NO BEAUTY IN THE BEAST 3Part I —N
- Page 6 and 7:
NO BEAUTY IN THE BEAST 5Piper for r
- Page 8 and 9:
NO BEAUTY IN THE BEAST 7those in th
- Page 10 and 11:
NO BEAUTY IN THE BEAST 9So, in sum,
- Page 12 and 13:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS11In Their Own Wo
- Page 14 and 15:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS 13————
- Page 16 and 17:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS 15light—despit
- Page 18 and 19:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS 17”Regarding w
- Page 20 and 21:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS 19“Let us neve
- Page 22 and 23:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS 21”Some messen
- Page 24 and 25:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS 23“One million
- Page 26 and 27:
REASONS 25Reasons“Charity begins
- Page 28 and 29:
REASONS 27series of questions. “W
- Page 30 and 31:
REASONS 29more difficult. Obviously
- Page 32 and 33:
REASONS 31imprisonment, houses and
- Page 34 and 35:
REASONS 33And, finally, (as well as
- Page 36 and 37:
REASONS 35Holocaust against Europea
- Page 38 and 39:
REASONS 37and hypocrites such as th
- Page 40 and 41:
REASONS 39In such a way, the Wester
- Page 42 and 43:
REASONS 41phraseology, and nothing
- Page 44 and 45:
REASONS 43Those who would scoff at
- Page 46 and 47:
REASONS 45demanding to be shown the
- Page 48 and 49:
REASONS 47and which has as much an
- Page 50 and 51:
REASONS 49these dramatic facts must
- Page 52 and 53:
REASONS 51Therefore, when we includ
- Page 54 and 55:
REASONS 53message threatened the ag
- Page 56 and 57:
REASONS 55It doesn’t take a mathe
- Page 58 and 59:
REASONS 57war between Islam and the
- Page 60 and 61:
REASONS 59the average Christian and
- Page 62 and 63:
REASONS 61To those who have not all
- Page 64 and 65:
REASONS 63really being subject to t
- Page 66 and 67:
REASONS 65In truth, this tendency t
- Page 68 and 69:
REASONS 6781Critical MassIf such a
- Page 70 and 71:
REASONS 69much of their energy towa
- Page 72 and 73:
REASONS 71the state of Israel would
- Page 74:
REASONS 73in their schools and neig
- Page 77 and 78:
76THE REST OF THE STORYThe Rest of
- Page 79 and 80:
78THE REST OF THE STORYto such an e
- Page 81 and 82:
80THE REST OF THE STORYIslam by maj
- Page 84 and 85:
“When we, the followers of prophe
- Page 86 and 87:
GRABBING A WOLF BY THE EARS 85cern
- Page 88: GRABBING A WOLF BY THE EARS 87exist
- Page 91 and 92: 90WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE . . .With
- Page 93 and 94: 92WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE . . .grou
- Page 95 and 96: 94WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE . . .Lest
- Page 98 and 99: “You brood of vipers! Who told yo
- Page 100 and 101: THE NEW SANHEDRIN 99arrive at the c
- Page 102 and 103: THE NEW SANHEDRIN 101by a Zionist p
- Page 104 and 105: THE NEW SANHEDRIN 103organizations
- Page 106: THE NEW SANHEDRIN 105Americans who
- Page 109 and 110: 108ONE LESS THAN SIX MILLIONOne Les
- Page 111 and 112: 110ONE LESS THAN SIX MILLIONIf thes
- Page 113 and 114: 112ONE LESS THAN SIX MILLIONpolitic
- Page 115: 114ONE LESS THAN SIX MILLIONto be v
- Page 118 and 119: BIRDS OF A FEATHER 117Birds of a Fe
- Page 120 and 121: BIRDS OF A FEATHER 119that will mak
- Page 122 and 123: BIRDS OF A FEATHER 121their folly i
- Page 125 and 126: 124“When the Israeli occupation s
- Page 127 and 128: 126THROUGH THE EYES OF A MUSLIMNeve
- Page 129 and 130: 128THROUGH THE EYES OF A MUSLIMlike
- Page 131 and 132: 130THROUGH THE EYES OF A MUSLIMAmer
- Page 133: 132THROUGH THE EYES OF A MUSLIMMarx
- Page 136 and 137: HISTORY’S FOGOTTEN BRAVEHEART 135
- Page 140 and 141: HISTORY’S FOGOTTEN BRAVEHEART 139
- Page 142 and 143: HISTORY’S FOGOTTEN BRAVEHEART 141
- Page 144 and 145: HISTORY’S FOGOTTEN BRAVEHEART 143
- Page 147 and 148: 146“We have to kill all the Pales
- Page 149 and 150: 148THOSE WHO HUNGER AND THIRST FOR
- Page 151 and 152: 150THOSE WHO HUNGER AND THIRST FOR
- Page 153 and 154: 152THOSE WHO HUNGER AND THIRST FOR
- Page 155 and 156: 154THOSE WHO HUNGER AND THIRST FOR
- Page 158 and 159: “The day will come when your enem
- Page 160 and 161: TEN GOOD MEN 159between good and ev
- Page 162 and 163: TEN GOOD MEN 161deny that this tiny
- Page 164 and 165: TEN GOOD MEN 163waiting for the ret
- Page 167 and 168: 166“Now everyone knows what was n
- Page 169 and 170: 168NO BEAUTY IN THE BEASThe know th
- Page 171 and 172: 170NO BEAUTY IN THE BEASTto imagine
- Page 173 and 174: 172NO BEAUTY IN THE BEASTwho have b
- Page 176 and 177: 175“My brother Mujahideen in the
- Page 178 and 179: INDEPENDENCE DAY 177her before leav
- Page 180 and 181: INDEPENDENCE DAY 179inherited them,
- Page 182 and 183: INDEPENDENCE DAY 181And so, what ha
- Page 184 and 185: INDEPENDENCE DAY 183own country fro
- Page 186 and 187: INDEPENDENCE DAY 185In the meantime
- Page 188 and 189:
PARTING THOUGHTS 187of those who ar
- Page 190 and 191:
RECOMMENDED READING 189The Essentia