Glenn – No Beauty In The Beast – Israel Without Her Mascara

36REASONS“chosen people” over others, nor any other form of supremacism that today has come to typify the mannerin which many view the Jews and how they should be treated. We should not maintain a sliding scale, orbetter yet, a graduated system of benefits for those who may or may not be a member of a particular racialor religious group. Despite what demands these individuals may make upon the rest of humanity, thetruth is that people are people and deserve to be judged and handled according to their merits and faults,and nothing more. Despite the picture they insist on imposing upon the rest of the world, there is no suchthing as the modern day equivalent of the god-men who used to occupy important positions among thevarious religions of the Greeks, Romans and Vikings. And the fact that they, “God’s chosen people” havesuffered does not change anything as well, especially since (in contradiction to the image that is depictedtoday by what is the Jewish monopoly over information and its dissemination) they are not the onlypeople who have suffered, nor have they even suffered the worst. The argument which they put forthtoday and which functions as one of the vertebrae within the backbone of the Jewish supremacist agendathat posits the notion that such individuals possess the moral right to murder people en masse and in allother ways be given an exemption over the rules governing objective right and wrong is farcical beyondrational thought, despite the fact that it is so widely embraced today. The fact that large numbers of thosein the West have so blindly ingested this type of thinking and have made it an integral part of theircivilization is an indicator as to how far the degeneration of their cultural health has progressed.For those who would try to deny away the existence of such a tendency, (this partiality in quantifying thesuffering of some based upon their membership in a particular group) we need only look at the reactionthat takes place on the part of those in the Zionist community (Jew or Gentile) when the argument thatthey themselves use in justifying their hellish behavior is employed by someone else. What they revealby such a reaction is the fact that in their agenda there exist no general principles, only particular ones,and, as we discussed earlier, the peculiarities of these principles change by virtue of who happens to bethe affected entity. And thus, expanding on the theme we discussed earlier, within this supremacistagenda all instances of suffering are equal, but some types of suffering are more equal than others.Therefore, in these Orwellian times in which we find ourselves, a particular action has no objective,organic qualities of its own. What these individuals dedicated to the Zionist agenda reveal is that thereare two standards that are used in determining the character of a particular action, and the sole criteriaused in designating the value assigned to that character is based on how it may or may not assist theJewish supremacist agenda. Violence against innocent Arabs is dignified and justified with what is bynow the effortless manipulation of words; a magic act that the Zionists have perfected to an art form.Noble language such as “pre-emptive military operations” are used to describe in the most sterile mannerthe murder of Palestinian school children, while Arabs who use justifiable violence against hostile invadersof their homeland are called “insurgents” and “terrorists”. The suffering of the Jews under Hitler, (anoccurrence made possible only through the assistance of Zionist organizations at the time) is used injustifying the invasion of a land and of murdering those within it, but yet the suffering that is the result ofugly Jewish supremacism does not warrant anything from its victims other than their quiet submissionto what has been a century now of murder, rape, and dehumanization. In what has been the sametraditional spirit of hypocrisy that has been the calling card of Jewish supremacism for 20 centuries nowand counting, the world watches as those who employ the logic of Cain go about the business of devouringtheir victims and who demand that such brutality be applauded or at the very least excused.And thus it is that we find that in the Zionized Christian West there is only one acceptable discussionconcerning victimhood and only one acceptable arena of debate concerning those who hunger and thirstfor justice, and for easily discernible reasons when one considers the parameters surrounding the Jewishsupremacist agenda. One needs only to look at history in determining why it is that intellectual cowards