Glenn – No Beauty In The Beast – Israel Without Her Mascara

REASONS 43Those who would scoff at these notions suffer by virtue of the fact that they are poorly informed as towhat comprises the complicated machinery of Western economies and infrastructures, and who do notrealize how precariously balanced all of it really is. One need look back no further than the blackout thatoccurred in the Eastern section of the US a year or so ago that was the result of one computer glitch insome remote part of Ohio. The more complicated the machinery, the more susceptible it is to breakdown,and whether such a breakdown is the result of poor maintenance or sabotage matters not.Those who are better informed concerning the precariousness of modern day Western life but who stillscoff at any talk of future troubles as a result of the illicit love affair between Zionism and the formerlyChristian West simply suffer by virtue of naiveté when it comes to understanding human nature, and inparticular as it involves the aspects of greed and power. Such naïve sentiments, which are prevalentthroughout almost all aspects of Western societies, are the product of the post-industrial era whereinsuch individuals view things from a purely materialistic perspective. In their very limited understanding,wars are caused simply from lack of basic necessities; food, land, water, shelter, etc, and therefore, giventhe fact that the capabilities of the post-industrial world are of such a character that anything can beproduced in short time and with little effort, all issues involving greed and want can be neutralized aswell. In the West (and more so in America) it is assumed that there is no problem that can’t be solved bythrowing a little bit of money and ingenuity into it. Disease has been conquered, as well as impoverishment,hunger, turmoil, etc, so why should this be any different?The mistake that such individuals make is in forgetting that people can be motivated by other thingsbesides the immediate hierarchy of their physical needs. There are some people who can have all thefood, water, land, shelter and everything else necessary to sustain a comfortable life, and who still will goto war to achieve more. What individuals such as these fail to consider is the fact that history, andparticularly recent history, is replete with examples of individuals who didn’t just want their fair share ofthe pie, but rather the whole thing, and sometimes for no other reason than that they didn’t want someoneelse to have any. What these Pollyannic individuals have failed to note is how powerful a motivatorideologies can be, and particularly those ideologies that are religious or tribal in their nature.In truth though, what must be stated is that such individuals (who scoff at the notion that great danger isto be found in the Jewish supremacist agenda) are not really being honest in their position. They understandthis issue well, the topic of ideologies and the manner in which their adherents can be motivated intocommitting the worst, but such individuals are selective as to when and against whom they will apply thisunderstanding. And once again, just like the infectious disease that is the leaven of the Jewish supremacistagenda, the program that is in operation here is mere hypocrisy, for a quick examination reveals thatindividuals such as these will only scoff at such a notion if the group of people in question happens to bethe Jews.In such a process as they manage it, any discussion of a conspiracy rooted in “Jewish interests” cannotconform to the scientific method of fact-finding and deduction, as if there were an organic impossibilitythat such dangerous individuals could exist. When it is reduced to its irreducible minimum, the programunder which such individuals have deluded themselves is that it is impossible that evil in any form mayemanate from the Jewish quarter, and, conversely, that the only evil that can exist is that which worksagainst the Jewish agenda. Like Pavlov’s dogs, the sentiments of such individuals can be turned on like alight switch in defending the agenda of their masters, sentiments completely disconnected with any trueintellectual processes and which vary between loyalty for the hand that feeds them and fear of the handthat can grab them by the throat. And thus it is in this manner therefore that we must view the intellectualparrying that takes place by today’s skeptics as but a magic act, and particularly so when the other side ofthe coin is discussed.