10.07.2015 Views

X-ray Study of Low-mass Young Stellar Objects in the ρ Ophiuchi ...

X-ray Study of Low-mass Young Stellar Objects in the ρ Ophiuchi ...

X-ray Study of Low-mass Young Stellar Objects in the ρ Ophiuchi ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS OF THE <strong>ρ</strong> OPHIUCHI CLOUD(footnotes for Table 5.2)* Background-subtracted X-<strong>ray</strong> counts <strong>in</strong> 0.5–2.0 keV, 2.0–9.0 keV, and 0.5–9.0 keV for s<strong>of</strong>t-band, hard-band, and <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r sources, respectively. (m) denotes sources with marg<strong>in</strong>al detections (<strong>the</strong> confidence level < 99.9 %, see §5.2).Although <strong>the</strong> confidence levels <strong>of</strong> A-48 and A-H2 are significant enough, we regard <strong>the</strong>m as marg<strong>in</strong>al sources because<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger source size (A-48) and severe contam<strong>in</strong>ation from A-2 (A-H2).† Right ascension and decl<strong>in</strong>ation for all sources are 16h and −24 ◦ .‡ Paren<strong>the</strong>ses <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> 90 % confidence limits.§ Observed flux (10 −14 ergs s −1 cm −2 ) and absorption-corrected X-<strong>ray</strong> lum<strong>in</strong>osity (10 29 ergs s −1 ; “< L X >” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>text) <strong>in</strong> 0.5–9.0 keV.‖ Reduced-χ 2 for <strong>the</strong> spectral fitt<strong>in</strong>gs. Paren<strong>the</strong>ses <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom.# We determ<strong>in</strong>e spectral parameters with fixed temperatures <strong>of</strong> 1 keV and 5 keV (see text). For sources which onlyshow <strong>the</strong> parameters for kT = 1 or 5 keV, no good fitt<strong>in</strong>g is obta<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r temperature.** We assume <strong>the</strong> same abundances as <strong>the</strong> “F2” phase <strong>in</strong> Table 6.3. The quiescent spectrum is not obta<strong>in</strong>ed because<strong>the</strong> decay phases <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two flares occupy all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> light curve.†† The pileup effect is not corrected.‡‡ No spectral fit is done due to <strong>the</strong> limited statistics.§§ Abundances are free parameters (§6.3.2, §6.3.3, and §6.3.7).‖‖ We make <strong>the</strong> flare spectra with a bit larger timescale <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> as good statistics as possible. Errors <strong>of</strong>< EM > for A-29 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> quiescent are not determ<strong>in</strong>ed because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limited statistics.## The spectra show <strong>the</strong> possible absorption edge <strong>of</strong> neutral Ca or warm Ar. The non-<strong>the</strong>rmal model also wellreproduces <strong>the</strong> spectra (§6.3.5, see also Hamaguchi et al. 2002).*** We assume <strong>the</strong> same temperature because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limited statistics.† † † These show non-<strong>the</strong>rmal spectra (§6.6.3).‡ ‡ ‡ These show two temperature model with an unusual abundance pattern (§6.2).§§§ Foreground star. The distance is 60 pc (Fest<strong>in</strong>, 1998).‖‖‖ The best-fit value <strong>of</strong> < kT > is not determ<strong>in</strong>ed (larger than 10 keV), hence we assume 10 keV temperature for<strong>the</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parameters.### N H and reduced-χ 2 are estimated by <strong>the</strong> simultaneous fitt<strong>in</strong>gs with <strong>the</strong> identical sources <strong>in</strong> obs-A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!