10.07.2015 Views

X-ray Study of Low-mass Young Stellar Objects in the ρ Ophiuchi ...

X-ray Study of Low-mass Young Stellar Objects in the ρ Ophiuchi ...

X-ray Study of Low-mass Young Stellar Objects in the ρ Ophiuchi ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.5. NEW YSO CANDIDATES – A-29, A-31, AND BF-36 85A-29 A-31 BF-36Fig. 6.20.— X-<strong>ray</strong> spectra <strong>of</strong> (left) A-29, (middle) A-31, and (right) BF-36. Black and g<strong>ray</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es<strong>in</strong>dicate spectra <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flare and quiescent phases, respectively. The upper panels show <strong>the</strong> datapo<strong>in</strong>ts (crosses) and <strong>the</strong> best-fit MEKAL models (solid l<strong>in</strong>e). For A-29 and A-31, we show <strong>the</strong>best-fit models with <strong>the</strong> assumed 5 keV temperature. The lower panels are <strong>the</strong> data residuals from<strong>the</strong> model.6.5.4 Possible orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> A-29, A-31, and BF-36A-29A-29 is found near <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 850 µm core SMM J16264−2424 with <strong>the</strong> separation angle<strong>of</strong> ∼11 ′′ . This is larger than <strong>the</strong> position accuracy <strong>of</strong> Chandra but is comparable to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>beam size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 850µm observation (∼14 ′′ , SCUBA). Assum<strong>in</strong>g a uniform density core, <strong>the</strong> columndensity <strong>of</strong> SMM J16264−2424 is estimated to be ∼10 23 cm −2 from <strong>the</strong> radio flux (Johnstone et al.,2000), which is consistent with <strong>the</strong> X-<strong>ray</strong>-determ<strong>in</strong>ed N H <strong>of</strong> A-29 (∼ 2×10 23 cm −2 ) with<strong>in</strong> largeuncerta<strong>in</strong>ty for both <strong>the</strong> values. It is hence highly possible that A-29 is located <strong>in</strong> or beh<strong>in</strong>d SMMJ16264−2424. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> LogN–logS relation by Mushotzky et al. (2000), we estimate <strong>the</strong> chanceprobability to detect a background AGN with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ∼11 ′′ radius to be ∼5 %. Although this valueis relatively large, A-29 shows a clear X-<strong>ray</strong> flare typical <strong>of</strong> low-<strong>mass</strong> stars but not seen <strong>in</strong> usualAGNs (Figure 6.19). No NIR counterpart <strong>of</strong> K < 15 mag, <strong>the</strong> association with <strong>the</strong> sub-millimetercore SMM J16264−2424, and <strong>the</strong> large absorption lead us to conclude that <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> A-29 is anembedded star younger than class I.A-31A-31 is located with<strong>in</strong> ∼2 ′′ from <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3 mm clump KSHK-A (Kamazaki et al., 2001),<strong>the</strong> central source <strong>of</strong> millimeter/sub-millimeter clump SM1/SMM J16264−2423 (Johnstone et al.,2000). Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical size <strong>of</strong> KSHK-A (∼4 ′′ ) and position uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>of</strong>Chandra and <strong>the</strong> Nobeyama Millimeter Ar<strong>ray</strong> <strong>in</strong>terferometer observation (∼5 ′′ ), we can conclude

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!