78 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES6.4 Brown DwarfsImanishi et al. (2001b) did a systematic X-<strong>ray</strong> search from bona-fide and candidate brown dwarfs<strong>in</strong> <strong>ρ</strong> Oph. Here, we show details.6.4.1 X-<strong>ray</strong> detection from brown dwarfs <strong>in</strong> <strong>ρ</strong> OphIn <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> obs-A and obs-BF, 18 late M dwarfs have been reported based on <strong>the</strong> watervapor absorption at λ = 2.4–2.5 µm (Wilk<strong>in</strong>g et al., 1999; Cush<strong>in</strong>g et al., 2000). Among <strong>the</strong>m,eight sources have <strong>the</strong> upper limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>mass</strong> less than 0.08 M ⊙ , which we call “bona-fide browndwarfs” (here and after, BDs).O<strong>the</strong>r seven sources have <strong>the</strong> lower limit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>mass</strong> less than0.08 M ⊙ , which is called “candidate brown dwarfs” (BD c s) 3 . Table 6.5 shows <strong>the</strong>ir names andspectral types.In <strong>the</strong> X-<strong>ray</strong> source catalogue (Table 5.2), we found X-<strong>ray</strong> counterparts for four BDs and BD c s(A-30 = GY37, A-38 = GY59, BF-86 = GY310, and BF-S2 = GY141). Also, a BD c GY5 maybe associated with a s<strong>of</strong>t-band source A-S2, although Imanishi et al. (2001b) reported no X-<strong>ray</strong>emission from GY5 by us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> NIR position <strong>of</strong> Barsony et al. (1997), which is ∼2 ′′ away from<strong>the</strong> 2MASS source. S<strong>in</strong>ce no apparent X-<strong>ray</strong> sources are found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> error radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 11catalogued BDs and BD c s, we def<strong>in</strong>e a circle with a half radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PSF size around each IRposition, <strong>the</strong>n manually count X-<strong>ray</strong> photons. We note that a ra<strong>the</strong>r small source radius is selectedso as to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, particularly for fa<strong>in</strong>t X-<strong>ray</strong> sources. Never<strong>the</strong>less,as is demonstrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bright sources, <strong>the</strong> position error between IR and X-<strong>ray</strong> is always smallerthan <strong>the</strong> source radius, because both have generally similar dependence on a source <strong>of</strong>f-axis angle;both have <strong>the</strong> smaller values for sources with smaller <strong>of</strong>f-axis angle. Therefore, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> X-<strong>ray</strong>photons for <strong>the</strong> relevant BDs and BD c s, if any, may fall <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> source circles. Table 6.5 shows <strong>the</strong>X-<strong>ray</strong> counts thus counted. The mean background counts are estimated from <strong>the</strong> same regions used<strong>in</strong> §5.6. The s<strong>of</strong>t band (0.5–2.0 keV) background counts (<strong>in</strong> units <strong>of</strong> 10 −2 counts arcsec −2 ) are 2.3and 2.2 for obs-BF and obs-A, respectively, while those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hard (2.0–9.0 keV) band are aboutthree times larger, 6.8 and 6.5 for obs-BF and obs-A. The background counts <strong>in</strong> each source areaare given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.5. We <strong>the</strong>n separately calculate <strong>the</strong> confidence level (CL) <strong>of</strong> X-<strong>ray</strong> detectionfor <strong>the</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t, hard, and total (0.5–9.0 keV) bands. Based on <strong>the</strong> Poisson statistics, we def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> CLasCL =N∑0 −1N ′ =0e −N N N ′bg bgN ′ ! , (6.2)3 Imanishi et al. (2001b) regarded GY31, GY163, and GY326 as BD cs. Now, however, <strong>the</strong> <strong>mass</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se M dwarfsis regarded to be higher than <strong>the</strong> hydrogen burn<strong>in</strong>g limit (Wilk<strong>in</strong>g et al., 1999), hence we do not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>BD c sample.
6.4. BROWN DWARFS 79where N 0 and N bg are <strong>the</strong> detected and <strong>the</strong> background counts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> source circle, respectively(see e.g., Gehrels, 1986, and references <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong>). We set a detection (or an upper limit) criterionthat <strong>the</strong> CL should be larger than 0.999 (= 3.3 σ) <strong>in</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three energy band data. In Table6.5, we show <strong>the</strong> maximum CL value for each source. For sources located <strong>in</strong> both fields <strong>of</strong> view(GY141 and GY202), we also estimate <strong>the</strong> CL for <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed data as well as <strong>the</strong> separate data.However, no higher CL value is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from all <strong>the</strong> sources. In addition to <strong>the</strong> seven X-<strong>ray</strong>sources, a BD c GY84 shows significant X-<strong>ray</strong>s, although it may be possible that <strong>the</strong>se X-<strong>ray</strong>s arepart <strong>of</strong> diffuse X-<strong>ray</strong> emission A-48 (see §6.6.2). We hence regard that <strong>the</strong> X-<strong>ray</strong> detection fromGY84 is marg<strong>in</strong>al.Table 6.5: Bona-fide and candidate brown dwarfs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ρ</strong> Oph cloud coresName Sp. type * ID † X-<strong>ray</strong> ‡ PSF § X-<strong>ray</strong> counts ‖ 1 − CL # L X** log(L X /L bol ) Ref ‡‡( ′′ ) S<strong>of</strong>t Hard BGD— Brown Dwarf (BD) —CRBR14 M7.5 A · · · 5.7 4 0 0.5 ND (S)
- Page 3:
Contents1 Introduction 12 Review of
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures2.1 The H-R diagram
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURESix6.17 Light curves
- Page 13 and 14:
List of Tables3.1 Multiwavelength s
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1IntroductionStar formation
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 2Review of Low-mass Young S
- Page 19 and 20:
2.1. EVOLUTION OF LOW-MASS STARS 5w
- Page 21 and 22:
2.2. MOLECULAR CLOUDS 72.2 Molecula
- Page 23 and 24:
2.3. X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF LOW-MASS
- Page 25 and 26:
2.3. X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF LOW-MASS
- Page 27:
2.3. X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF LOW-MASS
- Page 30 and 31:
16 CHAPTER 3. REVIEW OF THE ρ OPHI
- Page 32 and 33:
18 CHAPTER 3. REVIEW OF THE ρ OPHI
- Page 34 and 35:
20 CHAPTER 3. REVIEW OF THE ρ OPHI
- Page 36 and 37:
22 CHAPTER 4. INSTRUMENTATIONrespec
- Page 38 and 39:
24 CHAPTER 4. INSTRUMENTATIONangle
- Page 40 and 41:
26 CHAPTER 4. INSTRUMENTATIONThe AC
- Page 42 and 43: ¨28 CHAPTER 4. INSTRUMENTATIONspli
- Page 44 and 45: 30 CHAPTER 4. INSTRUMENTATIONTable
- Page 46 and 47: 32 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 48 and 49: 34 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 50 and 51: 36 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 52 and 53: 38 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 54 and 55: 40 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 56 and 57: 42 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 58 and 59: 44 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 60 and 61: 46 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 62 and 63: 48 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 64 and 65: 50 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 66 and 67: 52 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 68 and 69: 54 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 70 and 71: 56 CHAPTER 5. CHANDRA OBSERVATIONS
- Page 72 and 73: 58 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCEShig
- Page 74 and 75: 60 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESres
- Page 76 and 77: 62 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES6.2
- Page 78 and 79: 64 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESfla
- Page 80 and 81: 66 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESTab
- Page 82 and 83: 68 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESUsi
- Page 84 and 85: 70 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESlos
- Page 86 and 87: 72 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES6.3
- Page 88 and 89: 74 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESdes
- Page 90 and 91: 76 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESocc
- Page 94 and 95: 80 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES6.4
- Page 96 and 97: 82 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES6.5
- Page 98 and 99: 84 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES6.5
- Page 100 and 101: 86 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCEStha
- Page 102 and 103: 88 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCES1ke
- Page 104 and 105: 90 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESThe
- Page 106 and 107: 92 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESFig
- Page 108 and 109: 94 CHAPTER 6. INDIVIDUAL SOURCESPra
- Page 110 and 111: 96 CHAPTER 7. OVERALL FEATURE OF X-
- Page 112 and 113: 98 CHAPTER 7. OVERALL FEATURE OF X-
- Page 114 and 115: 100 CHAPTER 7. OVERALL FEATURE OF X
- Page 116 and 117: 102 CHAPTER 7. OVERALL FEATURE OF X
- Page 118 and 119: 104 CHAPTER 7. OVERALL FEATURE OF X
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 8Systematic Study of YSO Fl
- Page 123 and 124: 8.2. CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FLARE
- Page 125 and 126: 8.3. MAGNETIC RECONNECTION MODEL 11
- Page 127 and 128: 8.5. EFFECT OF THE QUIESCENT X-RAYS
- Page 129 and 130: 8.6. EVOLUTION OF YSOS AND THEIR FL
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 9ConclusionWe summarize the
- Page 133 and 134: Appendix AFlare Light CurvesFig. A.
- Page 135 and 136: Fig.A.2 (Continued)121
- Page 137: Fig. A.4.— Same as Figure A.1, bu
- Page 140 and 141: 126 APPENDIX B. PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
- Page 142 and 143:
128 APPENDIX B. PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix CModeling of the FlareIn t
- Page 147 and 148:
C.2. PREDICTED CORRELATIONS BETWEEN
- Page 149 and 150:
BibliographyAgeorges, N., Eckart, A
- Page 151 and 152:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 137Feigelson, E. D., &
- Page 153 and 154:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 139Johnstone, D., Wils
- Page 155 and 156:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 141Rutledge, R. E., Ba
- Page 157:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 143Yokoyama, T. & Shib