10.07.2015 Views

Coral Health and Disease in the Pacific: Vision for Action

Coral Health and Disease in the Pacific: Vision for Action

Coral Health and Disease in the Pacific: Vision for Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Analysis is used to ga<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about <strong>the</strong> social <strong>and</strong> natural systems to<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>m decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g“Gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> science right”Deliberation is used to frame analysis <strong>and</strong> to make ecosystem managementdecisions“Gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right science”A&D <strong>in</strong> Ecosystem Management The 1983 protocol dictated that scientists alone def<strong>in</strong>e ecosystem managementproblems <strong>and</strong> decide what analyses are pert<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>and</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r fixes are necessary The A&D protocol places analysis <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> service of deliberation <strong>and</strong> provides anopportunity <strong>for</strong> deliberants to help frame analysis However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity of A&D should vary with context – specifically trustPart III - Relationship of Trust to Participation Trust: <strong>the</strong> will<strong>in</strong>gness to accept <strong>the</strong> risk of deferr<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> judgments of o<strong>the</strong>rsbased on judgments of expertise <strong>and</strong> value similarity High trust: deference Low trust: vigilance The participation strategy that is most appropriate depends on stakeholders’ trustof o<strong>the</strong>r policy actors Policy actors <strong>in</strong>clude experts, fellow stakeholders, <strong>and</strong> government decisionmakersExpert Trust Stakeholders’ expert trust judgments based on: Perceived expertise Factual certa<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>and</strong> salience Subject matter <strong>and</strong> analytical competence Objective (unbiased) <strong>in</strong>terpretation Perceived value similarity Responsiveness to stakeholder concerns (fram<strong>in</strong>g), car<strong>in</strong>g attitude, openness,honesty, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>thrightness High expert trust: evidentiary participation Low expert trust: constitutive participationSocial Trust (of stakeholders) Stakeholders’ social trust judgments based on: Perceived expertise Familiarity Perceived value similarity History of social <strong>in</strong>teraction Con<strong>for</strong>mance to dom<strong>in</strong>ant culture <strong>and</strong> traditions Civic m<strong>in</strong>dedness High stakeholder trust: cooperative participation259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!