20.11.2012 Views

i Patrick W. Staib Anthropology This dissertation is approved, and it ...

i Patrick W. Staib Anthropology This dissertation is approved, and it ...

i Patrick W. Staib Anthropology This dissertation is approved, and it ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dominated much of Third World export agriculture, spurring l<strong>and</strong> d<strong>is</strong>putes <strong>and</strong> dangerous<br />

labor cond<strong>it</strong>ions as large-scale agribusinesses explo<strong>it</strong> the workforces of impover<strong>is</strong>hed<br />

debtor nations. Angus Wright (1996) depicts how the use of synthetic fertilizers <strong>and</strong><br />

pesticides resulted in severe contamination of water <strong>and</strong> food sources. Use of these<br />

chemicals also brought d<strong>is</strong>ease <strong>and</strong> death to explo<strong>it</strong>ed farmworkers in Mexico.<br />

In her cr<strong>it</strong>ical account of the Green Revolution in India, Shiva (1991) c<strong>it</strong>es the<br />

threat to local biodivers<strong>it</strong>y <strong>and</strong> crop resilience that resulted from the introduction of<br />

“super-seed technology” <strong>and</strong> “high-yielding varieties” in Punjab. Shiva claims,<br />

Far from bringing prosper<strong>it</strong>y, two decades of the Green Revolution have left<br />

Punjab riddled w<strong>it</strong>h d<strong>is</strong>content <strong>and</strong> violence. Instead of abundance, Punjab <strong>is</strong><br />

beset w<strong>it</strong>h d<strong>is</strong>eased soils, pest-infested crops, waterlogged deserts <strong>and</strong> indebted<br />

<strong>and</strong> d<strong>is</strong>contented farmers. Instead of peace, Punjab has inher<strong>it</strong>ed conflict <strong>and</strong><br />

violence (Shiva 1991:67).<br />

In Encountering Development: The Making <strong>and</strong> Unmaking of the Third World,<br />

Arturo Escobar provides a compelling cr<strong>it</strong>ique of the involvement of anthropolog<strong>is</strong>ts in<br />

Third World development. Escobar claims that ent<strong>it</strong>ies such as the World Bank, the IMF,<br />

<strong>and</strong> USAID have all defined nations as “Third World” or “developing” in contrast to the<br />

supposed “modern” world. In Escobar’s view, the First World industrialized nations<br />

“constructed” the notion of a “Third World.”<br />

The new poverty oriented programs reproduced the world of postwar<br />

development: a world organized around production <strong>and</strong> markets, divided between<br />

developed <strong>and</strong> underdeveloped, “trad<strong>it</strong>ional” <strong>and</strong> “modern,” ruled by the pol<strong>it</strong>ic of<br />

aid <strong>and</strong> multinational corporations, riddled by fears of overpopulation <strong>and</strong><br />

commun<strong>is</strong>m, anchored in a fa<strong>it</strong>h in material progress through technology <strong>and</strong> the<br />

explo<strong>it</strong>ation of nature (Escobar 1991:665).<br />

External inst<strong>it</strong>utions determine how local real<strong>it</strong>ies necess<strong>it</strong>ate the trans<strong>it</strong>ion from<br />

“trad<strong>it</strong>ional” to “modern” societies in Escobar’s deconstruction of the imbalance of<br />

power/knowledge in the development encounter. Much like the current s<strong>it</strong>uation in<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!