20.11.2012 Views

i Patrick W. Staib Anthropology This dissertation is approved, and it ...

i Patrick W. Staib Anthropology This dissertation is approved, and it ...

i Patrick W. Staib Anthropology This dissertation is approved, and it ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

strong ideological comm<strong>it</strong>ment to ecological or social justice values (rooted in ethnic<strong>it</strong>y,<br />

religion, or pol<strong>it</strong>ics) are likely to have stronger organizations <strong>and</strong> are likely to have<br />

greater success working w<strong>it</strong>h alternative coffee networks than those who are firmly<br />

rooted in western cap<strong>it</strong>al<strong>is</strong>t values of individual<strong>is</strong>m, compet<strong>it</strong>ion, <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />

explo<strong>it</strong>ation” (2003: 15). <strong>Th<strong>is</strong></strong> assumption perpetuates a preference for farmers who<br />

embody an ideal image of a coffee grower. Raynolds may be overlooking farmers who<br />

actively negotiate their att<strong>it</strong>udes <strong>and</strong> receptiv<strong>it</strong>y towards development innovations w<strong>it</strong>h<br />

concern for their personal survival.<br />

My research supports Raynolds’s assertion by applying a class-based<br />

interpretation of the potential for individual farmer success in alternative production <strong>and</strong><br />

trade. My data show that organic production principles are more accessible <strong>and</strong><br />

executable for farmers from the more mobile, educated, <strong>and</strong> affluent socioeconomic<br />

classes. Consequently, more medium-scale <strong>and</strong> large-scale farmers have been converting<br />

to organic production <strong>and</strong> are experiencing greater success than smaller farmers have. It<br />

<strong>is</strong> true that in a cap<strong>it</strong>al<strong>is</strong>t, class-based agrarian society, affluent farmers will stimulate job<br />

growth <strong>and</strong> improved investment. However, the paradox in th<strong>is</strong> form of development <strong>is</strong><br />

that <strong>it</strong> presumably provides ass<strong>is</strong>tance to the impover<strong>is</strong>hed family farmer, when in<br />

actual<strong>it</strong>y <strong>it</strong> helps the entrepreneurial class exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> succeed while offering minimal<br />

improvements for the poorest of farmers.<br />

Just as conventional development agendas have done since WWII, “alternative”<br />

approaches to small-scale agriculture tend to reinforce the h<strong>is</strong>torical inequ<strong>it</strong>ies <strong>and</strong><br />

dependencies. Development projects continue to leave commun<strong>it</strong>ies dependent on<br />

“development experts.” Instead of experiencing progress, many small-scale agrarian<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!