10.07.2015 Views

Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India

Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India

Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Remedy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> <strong>Menace</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> : A Vision DocumentChapter - 7Work Ahead: Critical Concerns <strong>and</strong> Key Challenges7.1 Unf<strong>in</strong>ished Agenda<strong>Arsenic</strong> was first detected <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> <strong>in</strong> the early 80s, <strong>in</strong> a village <strong>in</strong> West Bengal, wheresome <strong>of</strong> the villagers developed symptoms <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong>osis <strong>and</strong> sk<strong>in</strong> pigmentations. At that time,the cause for sickness <strong>and</strong> symptoms were not known to the medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. Neither thePublic Health Eng<strong>in</strong>eers nor the community water supply sector pr<strong>of</strong>essionals were aware <strong>of</strong>the danger posed by such a serious chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ant as <strong>Arsenic</strong>. There was absence <strong>of</strong>even the rudimentary facilities <strong>of</strong> water quality monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> surveillance <strong>in</strong> the rural areas <strong>of</strong>the country at that time. The people cont<strong>in</strong>ued dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g arsenic contam<strong>in</strong>ated water for years,got sick <strong>and</strong> hospitalized <strong>and</strong> then only the cause <strong>and</strong> source <strong>of</strong> water contam<strong>in</strong>ation wasidentified. S<strong>in</strong>ce then, dur<strong>in</strong>g the last three decades, substantial amount <strong>of</strong> work has been done toenrich our knowledge <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g.(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)The source <strong>and</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> ground water.Extent <strong>and</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> the same.Mechanism <strong>of</strong> dissolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arsenic</strong> from soil to ground water.Impact on Community Health: Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> sickness <strong>and</strong> symptoms.Development <strong>of</strong> technologies for removal <strong>of</strong> arsenic from ground water.Analytical techniques for detect<strong>in</strong>g arsenic from ground water.It is needless to say that a comprehensive underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the above aspects would goa long way <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g immediate, <strong>in</strong>terim <strong>and</strong> long term strategy, to address the problem. Thefirst decade, that is, the 80s, when the arsenic problem was first detected, was conspicuous byslow response <strong>of</strong> the adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g the problem <strong>and</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g the extent <strong>and</strong>magnitude <strong>of</strong> the same. The R&D studies, water quality monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> epidemiological assessment,were all too <strong>in</strong>adequate to measure up the situation. Till date, except the state <strong>of</strong> WestBengal, no other states <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>, <strong>and</strong> a very few countries, have developed a comprehensive plan<strong>of</strong> action to deal with the situation. Even <strong>in</strong> West Bengal, where a master plan for an ambitiousprogramme <strong>of</strong> supply<strong>in</strong>g arsenic-free water to all the affected villages through a system <strong>of</strong> pipedwater supply after appropriate treatment is <strong>in</strong> place, implementation <strong>of</strong> the same is tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>atelylong time. As a result, a large portion <strong>of</strong> the affected population cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be at risk.The basic agenda is <strong>of</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g a susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>and</strong> affordable supply <strong>of</strong> arsenic free water to allsegments <strong>of</strong> community, <strong>in</strong> the geographical areas, where concentration <strong>of</strong> arsenic <strong>in</strong> groundwater is high <strong>and</strong> above permissible limit. This agenda still rema<strong>in</strong>s largely unf<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong>the countries. In the next few paragraphs <strong>in</strong> this chapter, we will discuss the current knowledgegaps, critical concerns <strong>and</strong> key challenges, fac<strong>in</strong>g the country <strong>and</strong> also the factors which areimped<strong>in</strong>g the progress <strong>of</strong> mitigatory programmes.NIH & CGWB 125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!