Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India : A Vision DocumentRahman, M.M. and Rahaman, M.H. (2000), Application of low-pressure nanofiltration coupledwith a bicycle pump for the treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater,Desalination, 132, 307-314.Sarkar, A., Thogersen, Choudhury, Rahaman, Akhter and Choudhury (2000), Bucket treatmentunit for arsenic removal. In: Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Challenges of theMillennium, Pre-prints of the 26 WEDC Conference, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 308-310.Selvin N., Messham G., Simms J., Pearson I. and Hall J. (2000), The Development of GranularFerric Media - Arsenic Removal and Additional Uses in Water Treatment, Proc. AWWAWater Quality Technology Conference, Salt Lake City, USA.Shin Nihon Salt Co. Ltd. (2000), Report on Performance of Read-F Arsenic Removal Unit(ARU), October 2000.Smyth, D.J., Blowes, D.W. and Ptacek, C.J. (2000), Steel production wastes for use inpermeable reactive barriers (PRBs), Third International Conference on Remediation ofChlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, May 20-23, 2000, Monterey, CA.SOES (2000), Performance of Arsenic Removal Plants for Treating Ground Water withCommunity Participation, Report No.1, School of Environmental Studies, JadavpurUniversity, Kolkata, India.SOES (2001), Fate of Three Crore Rupee Arsenic Removal Plants in Murshidabad, Report No.2, School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.SOES (2003a), A Study Report on Efficiency of 259 Arsenic Removal Plants Installed in TenBlocks of the District North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, Report No. 4, School ofEnvironmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.SOES (2003b), Usefulness of Arsenic Removal Plants: A Case Study in Kolsur Gram Panchayetof Deganga Block in North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India, Report No. 5, School ofEnvironmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.SOES (2004), Physical Aspects of Arsenic Removal Plants (ARPs) Installed in 4 DifferentBlocks of North 24-Parganas, West Bengal (March-April 2004), Report No. 6, Schoolof Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.Su, C. and Puls, R.W. (2001), Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: kinetics, redoxtransformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation, EnvironmentalScience & Technology, 35, 1487-1492.Wang, L., Chen, A. and Fields, K. (2000), Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water by IonExchange and Activated Alumina Plants, EPA 600R00088, Prepared by Battelle undercontract 68C70008 for U.S. EPA ORD, October 2000.Wegelin, M., Gechter, D., Hug, S., Mahmud, A., Motaleb, A. (2000), SORAS - a simple arsenicremoval process (http://phys4.harvard.edu/~wilson /mitigation/SORAS_ Paper.html).Will, F. (1995), Removing toxic substances from soil using electrochemistry, Chemistry andIndustry, 376-379.NIH & CGWB 177
ReferencesYoung, E. (1996), Cleaning up arsenic and old waste, New Scientist, 14 December, 22,Zhang, W., Cai, Y., Tu, C. and Ma, L.Q. (2001), Speciation and distribution of arsenic in anarsenic hyperaccumulating plant, Biogeochemistry of Environmentally ImportantElements. Symposia, Papers Presented Before the Division of EnvironmentalChemistry, American Chemical Society, San Diego, CA, April 1-5, 2001.Nickson et al., 2000. Appl. Geochem., 15, 403-413.Pal et al., 2001. Gond. Res., 5, 2, 501-512.Pal et al., 2002, 82, 5, 554-561.PHED, 1991. Arsenic Pollution in Groundwater in West Bengal, Report.Pontius, F.W., Brown, K.G., and Chen, C., 1994, Health implications of arsenic in drinking water:Journal of the American Water Works Association, September, p.52-63.Price and Picher, 2002. EOS Trans., Am. Geophys. Union, 83, 47.Purakait and Mukherjee, 2008. www.springerlink.com/contentfh74142443112421.Ravi Shankar et al., 2001. J. Geol. Soc. India, 58,269-271.Rott and Lamberth. 1993. Water Supply, 11,143-156.Rowland et al., 2002. Water Res. Research, 38, 1-19.Rowland et al., 2007. Geobiology, 5, 3, 281-292.Roy et al., 2007. Proc. Int. Workshop on Arsenic, Kolkata.Saha, 1998. CSME Publ., p. 189.Sengupta et al., 2004. Environ. Geol., 45, 1071-1081.Sengupta et al., 2008. http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/esthag/asap/abs/es702988m.htmlSmedly and Kinniburg , 2002. Appl. Geochem., 17, 517-568.Stanger, 2005. Environ. Geochem. Health, 2005.Stanger et al., 2006. Environ. Geochem. Health, 28.Sullivan and Aller, 1996. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 9, 1-22.Swartz et al., 2004. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 68, 4539-4557.Ta TKO et al., 2002. Sed. Geol., 152, 313-325.Van Beek.1983. Ground Water, 21.Welch, A.H., Lico, M.S., and Hughes, J.L., 1988, Arsenic in ground water of the western UnitedStates: Ground Water, v. 26, no. 3, p. 333-347.WHO, 2008. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheet/fs210/en/Yang, Li, Donahoe, Rona J., and Graham, Elizabeth Y., Geological Sciences, Univ of Alabama,Box 870338, 202 Bevill Building, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, yang003@bama.ua.edu178NIH & CGWB
Page 5:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe Government of In
Page 8 and 9:
nearly 33 villages in 4 districts i
Page 10:
(iii) Whether ex-situ removal techn
Page 14 and 15:
6.4 Experiences during Arsenic Remo
Page 16 and 17:
List of FiguresFigure no. Figure ca
Page 18 and 19:
List of TablesTable no. Table Capti
Page 20 and 21:
Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwate
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
5.2.2 Co-precipitationMitigation an
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
5.8 SummaryMitigation and Remedy of
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147: Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwate
show all

Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?