Brennan, M.L., Trigeorgis, L., 2000. Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition: New Developmentsin the Theory and Application of Real Options, Oxford University PressChristensen, S., Kreiner, K., 1991. Prosjektledelse under usikkerhet, Universitetsforlaget A/S, Oslo(Title in english: "Project Management under Uncertainty").Clark, K. B., Fujimo<strong>to</strong>, T., 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organisation, andManagement in the World Au<strong>to</strong> Industry, Harvard Business School Press, Bos<strong>to</strong>n, Massachusetts.Eikeland, P.T. 2001. Teoretisk Analyse av Byggeprosesser, Samspill i byggeprosessen, prosjektnr.10602 (Title in english: "Theoretical Analaysis of the Construction Process")Eskerod, P., Östergren K., 2000. Why do Companies Standardize Projects Work?, ProjectManagement, Vol. 6, No 1, 2000.Hall, P., 1980. Great Planning Disasters, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Kreiner, K., 1995. In Search of Relevance: Project Management in Drifting Environments,Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 11., No. 4, pp 335-346.Love, P. E.D., Irani, Z., Edwards, D. J., 2003. Learning <strong>to</strong> Reduce Rework in Projects: Analysis ofFirm’s Organizational Learning and Quality Practices, Project Management Journal, Vol 34, no 3, 13-25.Mandelbaum, M., Buzacott, J., 1990. Flexibility in decision making, European Journal of OperationalReserach, Vol. 44., pp 17-27.Midler, C., 1995. “Projectification” of the firm: The Renault case, Scandinavian Journal ofManagement, Vol. 11., No. 4, pp 363-375.Miller, R., Lessard, D., 2000. The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects, Shapinginstitutions, Risks and Governance, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.Mintzberg, H., 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Prentice Hall International.Morris, P.W.G., Hough, G.H., 1991. The Ana<strong>to</strong>my of Major Projects. A Study of the Reality of ProjectManagement, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Poppendieck, M,. Poppendieck, T., 2003. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit. Addison-Wesley.Sager, T., 1990. Notions of Flexibility in Planning-Related Literature, Nordic Institute for Studies inUrban and Regional Planning, publication no. 1990:5.Samset, K., 1998. Project management in a high-uncertainty situation: Understanding risk and projectmanagement in international development projects. Ph.D. Thesis 1998:79, the Norwegian University ofScience and Technology.Verganti, R., 1999. Planned Flexibility: <strong>Link</strong>ing Anticipation and Reaction in Product DevelopmentProjects, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16., No. 4, pp 363-376.Yin, R.K., 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3 rd edition, Sage Publications.5
Paper 5.Olsson, N.O.E. 2006. ‘Impact analysis of railway projects in a flexibility perspective’.Transport Reviews 26:5, 557-569.
- Page 1 and 2:
ISBN 82-471-8121-5 (printed ver.)IS
- Page 3:
Preface and AcknowledgementsThe wor
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of ContentsPreface and Acknow
- Page 9 and 10:
Paper OverviewThe following papers
- Page 11 and 12:
AbstractTraditionally, projects ten
- Page 13 and 14:
alternative use. There are indicati
- Page 15 and 16:
1. Introduction1. IntroductionThis
- Page 17 and 18:
1. IntroductionFlexible projects ar
- Page 19 and 20:
1. IntroductionA literature review
- Page 21 and 22:
2. Study design2. Study designThe r
- Page 23 and 24:
2. Study designInformation Content
- Page 25 and 26:
3. Flexibility in different project
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Flexibility in different project
- Page 29 and 30:
3. Flexibility in different project
- Page 31 and 32:
4. Project stakeholders4. Project s
- Page 33 and 34:
4. Project stakeholdersmandatory qu
- Page 35 and 36:
4. Project stakeholdersBased on res
- Page 37 and 38:
5. Effectiveness and efficiency5. E
- Page 39 and 40:
5. Effectiveness and efficiencyconf
- Page 41 and 42:
5. Effectiveness and efficiencyDegr
- Page 43 and 44:
6. Project flexibility categorisati
- Page 45 and 46:
6. Project flexibility categorisati
- Page 47 and 48:
6. Project flexibility categorisati
- Page 49 and 50:
7. Conclusions7. ConclusionsThis th
- Page 51 and 52:
7. ConclusionsProject phasesFlexibi
- Page 53 and 54:
7. ConclusionsEnablersThis thesis r
- Page 55 and 56:
7. Conclusions16, Figure 17, and Fi
- Page 57 and 58:
7. Conclusions4. AbsorptionAbsorpti
- Page 59 and 60:
7. ConclusionsThere appears to be a
- Page 61 and 62:
ReferencesAbbot, A. & Banerji, K. 2
- Page 63 and 64: Gareis, R. 2004. Maturity of the Pr
- Page 65 and 66: Miller, R. & Lessard, D. 2000. The
- Page 67 and 68: Part 2.
- Page 69 and 70: Paper 1.Olsson, N.O.E. 2006. Manage
- Page 71 and 72: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 73 and 74: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 75 and 76: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 77 and 78: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 79 and 80: Paper 2.Magnussen, O.M. & Olsson, N
- Page 81 and 82: 282 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 83 and 84: 284 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 85 and 86: 286 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 87 and 88: 288 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 89 and 90: Projects trapped in their freedom:
- Page 91 and 92: 1. IntroductionThe purpose of this
- Page 93 and 94: project phases: preparation, freezi
- Page 95 and 96: establish realistic cost and time f
- Page 97 and 98: 4. ResultsIn the following, the emp
- Page 99 and 100: lowered the quality but the volume
- Page 101 and 102: Percent ofproject onSize of remaini
- Page 103 and 104: flexibility is introduced by the us
- Page 105 and 106: 100 %First official estimateApprova
- Page 107 and 108: ReferencesAndersen, B., Fagerhaug,
- Page 109 and 110: Paper 4.Olsson, N.O.E. 2004. ‘Fle
- Page 111 and 112: The concept of project flexibilityF
- Page 113: 3. CONCLUSIONSWhat seems to be impl
- Page 117 and 118: 558 N. O. E. Olsson et al.ex-post s
- Page 119 and 120: 560 N. O. E. Olsson et al.Table 1.O
- Page 121 and 122: 562 N. O. E. Olsson et al.and actua
- Page 123 and 124: 564 N. O. E. Olsson et al.Table 3.
- Page 125 and 126: 566 N. O. E. Olsson et al.Table 7.S
- Page 127 and 128: 568 N. O. E. Olsson et al.with a wi
- Page 129 and 130: Paper 6.Henriksen, B., Olsson, N. &
- Page 131 and 132: In this paper we use the process an
- Page 133 and 134: PROCESS ANALYSIS IN THE PLANNING OF
- Page 135 and 136: final framework for expected patien
- Page 137 and 138: User involvement also generated exp
- Page 139: Paper 7.Olsson, N.O.E. & Samset, K.
- Page 155 and 156: Project flexibility and front-end m
- Page 157 and 158: uncertainty. External flexibility c
- Page 159 and 160: 5.2. Flexibility in decision proces
- Page 161 and 162: Degree of redundancySlackPrecisionC