10.07.2015 Views

Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU

Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU

Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. ConclusionsEnablersThis <strong>thesis</strong> refers <strong>to</strong> enablers as fac<strong>to</strong>rs that contribute <strong>to</strong> making it possible forprojects <strong>to</strong> be flexible.Degree of redundancyRedundancy has been presented as an enabler for flexibility. Redundancy can beapplied <strong>to</strong> flexibility in both the product and decision process. Flexibility in theproduct may be achieved by over-specification of future functionality. A flexibledecision process calls for redundant recourses and time <strong>to</strong> perform analyses ofalternative project concepts. The rationality behind the use of redundancy is that thisuse of resources is cost effective compared <strong>to</strong> later major changes.IncentivesIncentives for different project stakeholders are strongly related <strong>to</strong> the contractingstructure of a project and other financial obligations. A common <strong>to</strong>ol for achievingflexibility in projects is the use of option-based contracts, which enable a continuouslocking of the projects. Flexibility has a value for those that can benefit fromadjustments, and it is a cost for those who have <strong>to</strong> adapt. The fewer restrictions ontheir part of the project, the better opportunities there are for any stakeholder <strong>to</strong>optimise the use of available resources.Modularity on macro and micro levelModularity has also been identified as an enabler for flexible project management. Ona micro level, design modularity is a <strong>to</strong>ol for efficiency because it may reducenegative effect of changes. On a macro level, it has been shown that modularity canbe an enabler for flexible decision processes because decision makers can make theincremental commitments. Macro modularisation of projects usually means that eachmodule can be produced over a shorter time period than would have been the case foran integrated project. Shorter execution time reduces the probability for majoradjustments during the project. Modularity on macro level was analysed for railwayinvestment projects. In the studied projects, macro modularisation was associated withcost control but also with lower benefit realisation than planned.7.2 What are the implications for front-end management?Successful strategies for project flexibility either aim at avoiding flexibility in projectsor enabling projects <strong>to</strong> manage flexibility. Projects avoid adjustments or live withthem. To be more specific and using the terminology presented in the <strong>thesis</strong>,successful strategies aim either at avoiding external flexibility after the front-endphase, or at managing external flexibility during the planning and execution phases.The following discussion is related <strong>to</strong> external flexibility. Project internal flexibilityhas not been analysed enough in this <strong>thesis</strong> <strong>to</strong> provide implications for projectmanagement.The longer the time-frame of a project, the less likely it is that prerequisites willremain unchanged. This means that the longer the time-frame of a project, the moreimportant it is <strong>to</strong> prepare the project <strong>to</strong> either avoid or manage changes.Even though the results are based on studies of a few projects, this <strong>thesis</strong> has shownthat the potential drawbacks of flexible projects are substantial, both in terms of39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!