Kunz, J.C., Rivero, C.E. & Levitt, R.E. (2000) Simulating work processes andorganisations <strong>to</strong> ”engineer” strategic projects. Proceedings oftETCE/OMAE2000 Joint Conference: Energy for the New Millenium,February 14-17 2000, New Orleans.Kunz, J.C., Levitt, R.E., Jin, Y. (1998) The Vitual Desing Team: A ComputationalSimulation Model of Project Organizations. Communications of theAssociation for Computing Machinery (CACM) 41:11, 84-91.Landau, M. 1969. Redundancy, rationality and the problem of duplication and overlapPublic Administration Review 29:July-August, 346–358.Lee, G. & Xia, W. 2005. The ability <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> business and technology changes:A study of flexibility measures. European Journal of Information Systems14:1, 75–92.Løken, A. 2005. Endringshåndtering i prosjekt Nytt Rikshospital. [Changemanagement in hospital development projects.] Project report. NorwegianUniversity of Science and Technology, Trondheim.Love., P.E.D., Irani, Z. & Edwards, D.J. 2004. A rework reduction model forconstruction projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51:4,426–440.Lundin, R.A. & Söderholm, A. 1995. A theory of the temporary organization,Scandinavian Journal of Management 11:4, 437–455.Lundin, R.A. & Söderholm, A. 1998. <strong>Concept</strong>ualizing a project society – discussionof an eco-institutional approach <strong>to</strong> a theory on temporary organisations. In:Lundin, R. & Midler, C. (eds.) Projects as Arenas for Renewal and LearningProceses, 13–23. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.Mahmoud-Jouini, S.B., Midler, C. & Garel, G. 2004. Time-<strong>to</strong>-market vs.time-<strong>to</strong>deliverymanaging speed in engineering, procurement and constructionprojects. International Journal of Project Management 22:5, 359–367.McElroy, B. & Mills, C. 2000. Managing stakeholders. In: Turner, R.J. & Simister,S.J. (eds.) Gower Handbook of Project Management. Gower, Aldershot.Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2006. http://www.m-w.com/ (accessed 4 April2006).Midler, C. 1995. ‘Projectification’ of the firm: The Renault case. ScandinavianJournal of Management 11:4, 363–375.Mikkelsen, H. & Riis, J.O. 2003. Grunnbog i prosjektledelse [Text book in projectmanagement.] Prodevo ApS, Rungsted.50
Miller, R. & Lessard, D. 2000. The Strategic Management of Large EngineeringProjects, Shaping institutions, Risks and Governance. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology, Cambridge, MA.Ministry of Finance. 2001. The Norwegian Government Budget. [St. prp 1. (2001-2002)]. Oslo.Mintzberg, H. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Prentice HallInternational, Hemel Hempstead/Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Morris, P.W.G. & Hough, G.H. 1987. The Ana<strong>to</strong>my of Major Projects. A Study of theReality of Project Management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Moseng, B. & Bredrup, H. 1993. A methodology for industrial studies of productivityperformance. Journal of Production Planning and Control 4:3.Müller, R. & Turner, J.R. 2005. The impact of principal-agent relationship andcontract type on communication between project owner and manager.International Journal of Project Management 23:5, 398–403.Norsk bygge- og anleggskontrakt NS 8405 [Norwegian building and civil engineeringcontract.] 2004. Norsk Standard. Norges Standardiseringsforbund, Oslo.OECD. 2000. OECD glossary of terms in evaluation and results based management.Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD].Olsson, N.O.E. & Haugland, H. 2004. Influencing fac<strong>to</strong>rs on train punctuality –results from some Norwegian studies. Transport Policy 11:4, 387–397.Olander, S. & Landin, A. 2005. Evaluation of stakeholder influence in theimplementation of construction projects. International Journal of ProjectManagement 23:4, 321–328.Packendorff, J. 1995. Inquiring in<strong>to</strong> the temporary organisation: New directions forproject management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11:4,319–334.PMI. 2004. A Guide <strong>to</strong> the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK®Guide. Project Management Institute, New<strong>to</strong>n Square, PA.Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Ashgate Publishing Company,Brookfield, Vermont.Samset, K. 2001. Prosjektvurdering i tidligfasen - Fokus på konseptet. Tapirakademisk forlag, Trondheim.Sink, D.S. & Tuttle, T.C. 1989. Planning and Measurement in Your Organization ofthe Future. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GA.51
- Page 1 and 2:
ISBN 82-471-8121-5 (printed ver.)IS
- Page 3:
Preface and AcknowledgementsThe wor
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of ContentsPreface and Acknow
- Page 9 and 10:
Paper OverviewThe following papers
- Page 11 and 12:
AbstractTraditionally, projects ten
- Page 13 and 14: alternative use. There are indicati
- Page 15 and 16: 1. Introduction1. IntroductionThis
- Page 17 and 18: 1. IntroductionFlexible projects ar
- Page 19 and 20: 1. IntroductionA literature review
- Page 21 and 22: 2. Study design2. Study designThe r
- Page 23 and 24: 2. Study designInformation Content
- Page 25 and 26: 3. Flexibility in different project
- Page 27 and 28: 3. Flexibility in different project
- Page 29 and 30: 3. Flexibility in different project
- Page 31 and 32: 4. Project stakeholders4. Project s
- Page 33 and 34: 4. Project stakeholdersmandatory qu
- Page 35 and 36: 4. Project stakeholdersBased on res
- Page 37 and 38: 5. Effectiveness and efficiency5. E
- Page 39 and 40: 5. Effectiveness and efficiencyconf
- Page 41 and 42: 5. Effectiveness and efficiencyDegr
- Page 43 and 44: 6. Project flexibility categorisati
- Page 45 and 46: 6. Project flexibility categorisati
- Page 47 and 48: 6. Project flexibility categorisati
- Page 49 and 50: 7. Conclusions7. ConclusionsThis th
- Page 51 and 52: 7. ConclusionsProject phasesFlexibi
- Page 53 and 54: 7. ConclusionsEnablersThis thesis r
- Page 55 and 56: 7. Conclusions16, Figure 17, and Fi
- Page 57 and 58: 7. Conclusions4. AbsorptionAbsorpti
- Page 59 and 60: 7. ConclusionsThere appears to be a
- Page 61 and 62: ReferencesAbbot, A. & Banerji, K. 2
- Page 63: Gareis, R. 2004. Maturity of the Pr
- Page 67 and 68: Part 2.
- Page 69 and 70: Paper 1.Olsson, N.O.E. 2006. Manage
- Page 71 and 72: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 73 and 74: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 75 and 76: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 77 and 78: N.O.E. Olsson / International Journ
- Page 79 and 80: Paper 2.Magnussen, O.M. & Olsson, N
- Page 81 and 82: 282 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 83 and 84: 284 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 85 and 86: 286 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 87 and 88: 288 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 89 and 90: Projects trapped in their freedom:
- Page 91 and 92: 1. IntroductionThe purpose of this
- Page 93 and 94: project phases: preparation, freezi
- Page 95 and 96: establish realistic cost and time f
- Page 97 and 98: 4. ResultsIn the following, the emp
- Page 99 and 100: lowered the quality but the volume
- Page 101 and 102: Percent ofproject onSize of remaini
- Page 103 and 104: flexibility is introduced by the us
- Page 105 and 106: 100 %First official estimateApprova
- Page 107 and 108: ReferencesAndersen, B., Fagerhaug,
- Page 109 and 110: Paper 4.Olsson, N.O.E. 2004. ‘Fle
- Page 111 and 112: The concept of project flexibilityF
- Page 113 and 114: 3. CONCLUSIONSWhat seems to be impl
- Page 115 and 116:
Paper 5.Olsson, N.O.E. 2006. ‘Imp
- Page 117 and 118:
558 N. O. E. Olsson et al.ex-post s
- Page 119 and 120:
560 N. O. E. Olsson et al.Table 1.O
- Page 121 and 122:
562 N. O. E. Olsson et al.and actua
- Page 123 and 124:
564 N. O. E. Olsson et al.Table 3.
- Page 125 and 126:
566 N. O. E. Olsson et al.Table 7.S
- Page 127 and 128:
568 N. O. E. Olsson et al.with a wi
- Page 129 and 130:
Paper 6.Henriksen, B., Olsson, N. &
- Page 131 and 132:
In this paper we use the process an
- Page 133 and 134:
PROCESS ANALYSIS IN THE PLANNING OF
- Page 135 and 136:
final framework for expected patien
- Page 137 and 138:
User involvement also generated exp
- Page 139:
Paper 7.Olsson, N.O.E. & Samset, K.
- Page 155 and 156:
Project flexibility and front-end m
- Page 157 and 158:
uncertainty. External flexibility c
- Page 159 and 160:
5.2. Flexibility in decision proces
- Page 161 and 162:
Degree of redundancySlackPrecisionC