Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU
Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU
Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. Project stakeholdersmanda<strong>to</strong>ry quality assurance aims at defining the projects as precisely as possible, butstill provides project management with the freedom <strong>to</strong> decide how the specificationsare <strong>to</strong> be met and budgets <strong>to</strong> be upheld. In a similar way, Turner (2004) claims tha<strong>to</strong>ne of four necessary conditions for project success is that the project manager isempowered. The project owner should give guidance on how the project can be bestachieved, but allow project managers flexibility <strong>to</strong> handle unforeseen circumstances.Note that Williams (1997) claims that project risk management and empowerment ofteams within a project compete with each other in complex projects, because ofinterconnection between the tasks of different project teams.Project external flexibility has its roots in an effectiveness perspective. Based on whatis termed a social science tradition, an objective of the front-end phase is <strong>to</strong> align thecontent of the project <strong>to</strong> the objectives of the stakeholders. Objectives may beshifting; implying certain needs for flexibility. It is primarily the value of this type offlexibility that is quantified by real options (Amram & Kulatlaka 1999, Brennan &Trigeorgis 2000). This type of flexibility option appears particularly desirable <strong>to</strong> usersand project owners.Internal and external flexibility, on the one hand, and internal and contextualuncertainty on the other hand, are related issues. However, internal flexibility is notnecessarily a response <strong>to</strong> internal uncertainty, and external flexibility can, but does nothave <strong>to</strong>, be a response <strong>to</strong> contextual uncertainty. Figure 5 shows that all combinationsof the two dimensions can be found.The empirical data that this <strong>thesis</strong> is based on provide mainly information aboutexternal flexibility. In-depth analysis of project internal flexibility would requiredifferent empirical sources. The distinction between project internal and externalflexibility was made for two reasons. First, it is intended <strong>to</strong> clarify the flexibilityapproaches that have been the main focus in the <strong>thesis</strong>. Secondly, the distinctionbetween project internal and external flexibility is intended as a contribution <strong>to</strong> thegeneral framework for analysis of project flexibility.InternaluncertaintyContextualuncertaintyInternalflexibilityExternalflexibilityAdjustment ofplans due <strong>to</strong>new projectinternalinformationScopeadjustmentsdue <strong>to</strong> newproject internalinformationAdjustment ofplans due <strong>to</strong>new prerequisitesScopeadjustmentsdue <strong>to</strong> newprerequisitesFigure 5. Internal and external flexibility, combined with internal and contextualuncertainty.19