10.07.2015 Views

Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU

Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU

Link to thesis - Concept - NTNU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Project stakeholdersmanda<strong>to</strong>ry quality assurance aims at defining the projects as precisely as possible, butstill provides project management with the freedom <strong>to</strong> decide how the specificationsare <strong>to</strong> be met and budgets <strong>to</strong> be upheld. In a similar way, Turner (2004) claims tha<strong>to</strong>ne of four necessary conditions for project success is that the project manager isempowered. The project owner should give guidance on how the project can be bestachieved, but allow project managers flexibility <strong>to</strong> handle unforeseen circumstances.Note that Williams (1997) claims that project risk management and empowerment ofteams within a project compete with each other in complex projects, because ofinterconnection between the tasks of different project teams.Project external flexibility has its roots in an effectiveness perspective. Based on whatis termed a social science tradition, an objective of the front-end phase is <strong>to</strong> align thecontent of the project <strong>to</strong> the objectives of the stakeholders. Objectives may beshifting; implying certain needs for flexibility. It is primarily the value of this type offlexibility that is quantified by real options (Amram & Kulatlaka 1999, Brennan &Trigeorgis 2000). This type of flexibility option appears particularly desirable <strong>to</strong> usersand project owners.Internal and external flexibility, on the one hand, and internal and contextualuncertainty on the other hand, are related issues. However, internal flexibility is notnecessarily a response <strong>to</strong> internal uncertainty, and external flexibility can, but does nothave <strong>to</strong>, be a response <strong>to</strong> contextual uncertainty. Figure 5 shows that all combinationsof the two dimensions can be found.The empirical data that this <strong>thesis</strong> is based on provide mainly information aboutexternal flexibility. In-depth analysis of project internal flexibility would requiredifferent empirical sources. The distinction between project internal and externalflexibility was made for two reasons. First, it is intended <strong>to</strong> clarify the flexibilityapproaches that have been the main focus in the <strong>thesis</strong>. Secondly, the distinctionbetween project internal and external flexibility is intended as a contribution <strong>to</strong> thegeneral framework for analysis of project flexibility.InternaluncertaintyContextualuncertaintyInternalflexibilityExternalflexibilityAdjustment ofplans due <strong>to</strong>new projectinternalinformationScopeadjustmentsdue <strong>to</strong> newproject internalinformationAdjustment ofplans due <strong>to</strong>new prerequisitesScopeadjustmentsdue <strong>to</strong> newprerequisitesFigure 5. Internal and external flexibility, combined with internal and contextualuncertainty.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!