Download - EnglishAgenda - British Council

3. Please see Appendix A for further details.4. Please contact the authors for further details of this and the other instrumentsused.5. Respondents were asked to indicate their responses to each of the questionsin terms of ‘Strongly agree’ (4), ‘Agree’ (3), ‘Disagree’ (2) or ‘Strongly disagree’(1), and the means for each item calculated accordingly. Please contact theauthors if you would also like a summary of the detailed results for each of thequestions.6. Please see the List of acronyms above for an explanation of the abbreviationsused for the interview and focus group excerpts.7. ‘I’ = interviewee, ‘R’ = researcher.8. ‘FG’ = focus group member.9. Square brackets indicate our interpolations.10. It was the second most frequent of the codes in this part of the data.ReferencesAdey, P. (2004) The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory.Dordretch, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Ajzen, I. (2005) Attitudes, personality and behavior. (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: OpenUniversity Press.Bell, B. & J. Gilbert (1996) Teacher development. London: Falmer Press.Eraut, M. (1994) Developing professional knowledge and competence. London;Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.Fullan, M. (1999) Change forces : The sequel. London; Philadelphia, Pa.: Falmer Press.Fullan, M. (2005) Introduction: Scaling up the educational change process. InFullan, M. (ed.) Fundamental change: International handbook of educational change.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 1-2.Fullan, M. (2007) The new meaning of educational change. (4th). Abingdon, Oxon.:Routledge.Gaies, S. & S. Bowers (1990) Clinical supervision of language teaching: Thesupervisor as trainer and educator. In Richards, J. C. & D. Nunan (eds.) Secondlanguage teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 167-181.Godfrey, J., D. Murray, S. Nimmannit & M. Wirth (2008) Teacher development inThailand: Differing perspectives. In Murray, D. E. (ed.) Planning change, changingplans: Innovations in second language teaching. Ann Arbor: University of MichiganPress, 138-154.Best Practice INSET | 341