11.07.2015 Views

Annual Accounts and Report as at 30 June 2011 Draft - Mediobanca

Annual Accounts and Report as at 30 June 2011 Draft - Mediobanca

Annual Accounts and Report as at 30 June 2011 Draft - Mediobanca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1 - Value <strong>at</strong> risk <strong>and</strong> expected shortfall of <strong>as</strong>set structure12 mths toRisk factors 12 mths to <strong>30</strong>/6/11<strong>30</strong>/6/10(€’000) <strong>30</strong>/6 Min. Max. Avg. Avg.Interest r<strong>at</strong>es ................... <strong>30</strong>,619 12,244 42,726 18,926 18,644- of which: specific risk 19,861 7,695 28,278 14,335 9,348Share prices ................... 21,566 12,392 37,716 22,176 20,585Exchange r<strong>at</strong>es ................. 6,7<strong>30</strong> 909 7,427 3,366 1,999Infl<strong>at</strong>ion ....................... 280 200 979 436 1,566Vol<strong>at</strong>ility ....................... 3,987 1,218 4,794 2,528 1,490Diversific<strong>at</strong>ion effect *........... (14,217) (4,533) (21,057) (12,<strong>30</strong>6) (9,479)TOTAL ......................... 48,685 21,606 71,126 34,691 34,805Expected shortfall............. 86,166 65,472 88,402 78,270 65,098* Due to mism<strong>at</strong>ches between risk factors.The average expected shortfall 3 reading w<strong>as</strong> up 20%, from €65.1m to€78.3m, due chiefly to l<strong>as</strong>t year’s d<strong>at</strong>a being affected by the sharp rises invol<strong>at</strong>ility, which were not reflected accur<strong>at</strong>ely in the calcul<strong>at</strong>ion method b<strong>as</strong>ed onhistorical simul<strong>at</strong>ion.Analysis of VaR for the trading book (cf. Table 2 below) overall reflects thetrends witnessed in the various different risk factors <strong>at</strong> the aggreg<strong>at</strong>e level. Theincre<strong>as</strong>e of around 10% in the average d<strong>at</strong>a, from €18.1m to €20.1m, compared tothe stability of the aggreg<strong>at</strong>e d<strong>at</strong>a, is exclusively due to the contribution of thearbitrage positions on equities, the overall effect of which is mitig<strong>at</strong>ed by thepresence of AFS equity positions.Of the other risk factors, there w<strong>as</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in the exchange r<strong>at</strong>es <strong>and</strong>vol<strong>at</strong>ility components <strong>and</strong> a reduction in infl<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>and</strong> although the interest r<strong>at</strong>ecurves’ contribution reflect higher specific risk (up from €6.5m to €10.7m), overallit w<strong>as</strong> down from €17m to €15.6m. The highs <strong>and</strong> lows for VaR readings were alsoless pronounced: the high for the period w<strong>as</strong> just under €40m (compared with over€90m l<strong>as</strong>t year), <strong>and</strong> the low over €11m (€4.7m). Conversely, there w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>ubstantial incre<strong>as</strong>e in the expected shortfall.3Average of losses recorded in 1% of the most unfavourable scenarios.– 181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!