11.07.2015 Views

HSE Child Protection and Welfare Service in Carlow/Kilkenny - hiqa.ie

HSE Child Protection and Welfare Service in Carlow/Kilkenny - hiqa.ie

HSE Child Protection and Welfare Service in Carlow/Kilkenny - hiqa.ie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inspection of the <strong>HSE</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Protection</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Welfare</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Carlow</strong>/<strong>Kilkenny</strong> Local Health Area <strong>in</strong> the<strong>HSE</strong> South RegionHealth Information <strong>and</strong> Quality AuthorityThe LHA provided the Authority with a document which outl<strong>in</strong>ed the purpose of thechildren <strong>and</strong> family service, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the service’s basis <strong>in</strong> legislation. However, it didnot describe how the service protected children <strong>and</strong> promoted their welfare or theservice’s objectives, its models of service delivery <strong>and</strong> the aligned resourcesnecessary to protect children <strong>and</strong> promote their welfare.Nationally, the 2012 service plan identif<strong>ie</strong>d a number of priorit<strong>ie</strong>s for children <strong>and</strong>family services <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:• promot<strong>in</strong>g the major culture change required <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> deliver<strong>in</strong>gservices to children <strong>and</strong> their famil<strong>ie</strong>s• implement<strong>in</strong>g consistent child protection procedures <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the revised<strong>Child</strong>ren First national guidel<strong>in</strong>es (2011).• cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g the reforms necessary to provide a comprehensive range of highquality services for children <strong>in</strong> care• improv<strong>in</strong>g effective multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary shared practice <strong>and</strong> effic<strong>ie</strong>nt communityengagement.The area manager advised <strong>in</strong>spectors that the primary focus for the local operationalplan was to support the implementation of the comprehensive national changeprogramme which had consolidated all the reform <strong>in</strong>itiatives aris<strong>in</strong>g from recentrev<strong>ie</strong>ws <strong>in</strong>to a coord<strong>in</strong>ated change programme. The LHA had committed to a numberof priorit<strong>ie</strong>s for 2012 <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:• implement<strong>in</strong>g child protection procedures <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the revised <strong>Child</strong>ren Firstnational guidel<strong>in</strong>es (2011)• implement<strong>in</strong>g phase 2 of the st<strong>and</strong>ardised bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes.At the time of the <strong>in</strong>spection neither of these had been fully implemented. It wasunclear how the service was monitored <strong>and</strong> evaluated aga<strong>in</strong>st strategic objectives orwho was held to account for them.Performance management <strong>and</strong> quality assurance processes were <strong>in</strong>adequate. Therewas a significant amount of <strong>in</strong>formation available to front l<strong>in</strong>e managers <strong>and</strong> socialworkers, but it had not been used systematically to drive improvement <strong>and</strong> ga<strong>in</strong> acomprehensive underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the dem<strong>and</strong> for services. The dataset submitted aspart of the <strong>in</strong>spection process identif<strong>ie</strong>d risks <strong>in</strong> relation to a number of stages of thechild protection <strong>and</strong> welfare report<strong>in</strong>g process. This <strong>in</strong>formation was already available<strong>in</strong> the LHA but had not been used to br<strong>in</strong>g about improvements <strong>in</strong> the service,especially at the <strong>in</strong>take phase of the process.Audit<strong>in</strong>g of social work practice took place <strong>in</strong>frequently. Audits were not completed toan adequate st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> there was a lack of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, analysis <strong>and</strong> actions agreedto ensure that case work was of a good st<strong>and</strong>ard. The audits did not <strong>in</strong>form serviceimprovement or aid social workers’ development <strong>and</strong> practice. The LHA had been<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> an audit of 40 case files at a regional level. The audit looked at a number35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!