Net Amount RecognizedPension plansPost retirement benefit plansU.S. plans (1) Non-U.S. plans U.S. plans Non-U.S. plansIn millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009Change in projected benefit obligationProjected benefit obligation at beginning of year $11,178 $11,010 $5,400 $4,563 $ 1,086 $1,062 $ 1,141 $ 937Benefits earned during the year 14 18 167 148 1 1 23 26Interest cost on benefit obligation 644 649 342 301 59 60 105 89Plan amendments — — 8 (2) — — — (4)Actuarial loss 537 559 459 533 108 43 120 57Benefits paid (643) (1,105) (264) (225) (87) (93) (47) (42)Expected Medicare Part D subsidy — — — — 12 13 — —Divestitures — — — (170) — — — —Settlements — — (49) (94) — — — —Curtailments (2) — 47 — 13 — — — (3)Foreign exchange impact and other — — 126 333 — — 53 81Projected benefit obligation at year end $11,730 $11,178 $6,189 $5,400 $ 1,179 $1,086 $ 1,395 $1,141Change in plan assetsPlan assets at fair value at beginning of year $ 9,934 $11,516 $5,592 $4,536 $ 114 $ 143 $ 967 $ 671Actual return on plan assets 1,271 (488) 432 728 10 (7) 126 194Company contributions (3) 999 11 305 382 58 71 75 91Employee contributions — — 6 5 — — — —Divestitures — — — (122) — — — —Settlements — — (49) (95) — — — —Benefits paid (643) (1,105) (264) (225) (87) (93) (47) (42)Foreign exchange impact and other — — 123 383 — — 55 53Plan assets at fair value at year end $11,561 $ 9,934 $6,145 $5,592 $ 95 $ 114 $ 1,176 $ 967Funded status of the plan at year end (4) $ (169) $ (1,244) $ (44) $ 192 $(1,084) $ (972) $ (219) $ (174)Net amount recognizedBenefit asset $ — $ — $ 528 $ 684 $ — $ — $ 52 $ 57Benefit liability (169) (1,244) (572) (492) (1,084) (972) (271) (231)Net amount recognized on the balance sheet $ (169) $ (1,244) $ (44) $ 192 $(1,084) $ (972) $ (219) $ (174)Amounts recognized in Accumulatedother comprehensive income (loss)Net transition obligation $ — $ — $ (2) $ (4) $ — $ — $ 1 $ 1Prior service cost (benefit) (1) (2) 26 23 (6) (10) (6) (5)Net actuarial loss 4,021 3,927 1,652 1,280 194 99 486 393Net amount recognized in equity—pretax $ 4,020 $ 3,925 $1,676 $1,299 $ 188 $ 89 $ 481 $ 389Accumulated benefit obligation at year end $11,689 $11,129 $5,576 $4,902 $ 1,179 $1,086 $ 1,395 $1,141(1) The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the aggregate projected benefit obligation was $658 million and $637 million and the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation was $648 million and$636 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These plans are unfunded. As such, the funded status of these plans is $(658) million and $(637) million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) reflects pretax charges of $167 million and $137 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, that primarily relate to net actuarial loss.(2) Changes in projected benefit obligation due to curtailments in the non-U.S. pension plans in 2010 include $(5) million and $(3) million in curtailment gains and $5 million and $16 million in special termination costsduring 2010 and 2009, respectively.(3) Company contributions to the U.S. pension plan include $999 million and $11 million during 2010 and 2009, respectively. This includes a discretionary cash contribution of $995 million in 2010 and advisory fees paidto Citi Alternative Investments. Company contributions to the non-U.S. pension plans include $40 million and $29 million of benefits paid directly by the Company during 2010 and 2009, respectively.(4) The U.S. qualified pension plan is fully funded under specified ERISA funding rules as of January 1, 2010 and projected to be fully funded under these rules as of December 31, 2010.192
The following table shows the change in Accumulated other comprehensiveincome (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2010:In millions of dollars 2010Balance, January 1, 2010, net of tax (1) $(3,461)Actuarial assumptions changes and plan experience (2) (1,257)Net asset gain due to actual returns exceeding expected returns 479Net amortizations 137Foreign exchange impact and other (437)Change in deferred taxes, net $ 434Change, net of tax $ (644)Balance, December 31, 2010, net of tax (1) $(4,105)At the end of 2010 and 2009, for both qualified and nonqualified plansand for both funded and unfunded plans, the aggregate projected benefitobligation (PBO), the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation (ABO), andthe aggregate fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projectedbenefit obligation in excess of plan assets, and pension plans with anaccumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, were as follows:(1) See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of net accumulated othercomprehensive income (loss) balance.(2) <strong>Inc</strong>ludes $33 million in net actuarial losses related to U.S. nonqualified pension plans.PBO exceeds fair value of planassetsABO exceeds fair value of planassetsU.S. plans (1) Non-U.S. plans U.S. plans (1) Non-U.S. plansIn millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009Projected benefit obligation $12,388 $11,815 $2,305 $1,662 $12,388 $11,815 $1,549 $1,288Accumulated benefit obligation 12,337 11,765 1,949 1,414 12,337 11,765 1,340 1,127Fair value of plan assets 11,561 9,934 1,732 1,169 11,561 9,934 1,046 842(1) In 2010, the PBO and ABO of the U.S. plans include $11,730 million and $11,689 million, respectively, relating to the qualified plan and $658 million and $648 million, respectively, relating to the nonqualified plans. In2009, the PBO and ABO of the U.S. plans include $11,178 million and $11,129 million, respectively, relating to the qualified plan and $637 million and $636 million, respectively, relating to the nonqualified plans.At December 31, 2010, combined accumulated benefit obligations forthe U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans, excluding U.S. nonqualified plans,exceeded plan assets by $0.4 billion. At December 31, 2009, combinedaccumulated benefit obligations for the U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans,excluding U.S. nonqualified plans, exceeded plan assets by $0.5 billion.Discount RateThe discount rates for the U.S. pension and postretirement plans were selectedby reference to a <strong>Citigroup</strong>-specific analysis using each plan’s specificcash flows and compared with high quality corporate bond indices forreasonableness. <strong>Citigroup</strong>’s policy is to round to the nearest five hundredthsof a percent. Accordingly, at December 31, 2010, the discount rate was setat 5.45% for the pension plans and at 5.10% for the postretirement welfareplans.At December 31, 2009, the discount rate was set at 5.90% for the pensionplans and 5.55% for the postretirement plans, referencing a <strong>Citigroup</strong>-specificcash flow analysis.The discount rates for the non-U.S. pension and postretirement plans areselected by reference to high quality corporate bond rates in countries thathave developed corporate bond markets. However, where developed corporatebond markets do not exist, the discount rates are selected by reference to localgovernment bond rates with a premium added to reflect the additional riskfor corporate bonds.The discount rate and future rate of compensation assumptions used indetermining pension and postretirement benefit obligations and net benefitexpense for the Company’s plans are shown in the following table:At year end 2010 2009Discount rateU.S. plans (1)Pension 5.45% 5.90%Postretirement 5.10 5.55Non-U.S. pension plansRange 1.75 to 14.00 2.00 to 13.25Weighted average 6.23 6.50Future compensation increase rateU.S. plans (2) 3.00 3.00Non-U.S. pension plansRange 1.0 to 11.0 1.0 to 12.0Weighted average 4.66 4.60During the year 2010 2009Discount rateU.S. plans (1)Pension 5.90% 6.10%Postretirement 5.55 6.00Non-U.S. pension plansRange 2.00 to 13.25 1.75 to 17.0Weighted average 6.50 6.60Future compensation increase rateU.S. plans (2) 3.00 3.00Non-U.S. pension plansRange 1.0 to 12.0 1.0 to 11.5Weighted average 4.60 4.50(1) Weighted-average rates for the U.S. plans equal the stated rates.(2) Effective January 1, 2008, the U.S. qualified pension plan was frozen except for certain grandfatheredemployees accruing benefits under a final pay plan formula. Only the future compensation increasesfor these grandfathered employees will affect future pension expense and obligations. Futurecompensation increase rates for small groups of employees were 4% or 6%.193
- Page 1 and 2:
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANG
- Page 3 and 4:
CITIGROUP’S 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON
- Page 5 and 6:
As described above, Citigroup is ma
- Page 7 and 8:
Operating ExpensesCitigroup operati
- Page 9 and 10:
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINAN
- Page 11 and 12:
CITIGROUP REVENUESIn millions of do
- Page 13 and 14:
REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKINGRegional C
- Page 15 and 16:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 17 and 18:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 19 and 20:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 21 and 22:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 23 and 24:
SECURITIES AND BANKINGSecurities an
- Page 25 and 26:
TRANSACTION SERVICESTransaction Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENTBroke
- Page 29 and 30:
Japan Consumer FinanceCitigroup con
- Page 31 and 32:
The following table provides detail
- Page 33 and 34:
CORPORATE/OTHERCorporate/Other incl
- Page 35 and 36:
During 2010, average Consumer loans
- Page 37 and 38:
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 3
- Page 39 and 40:
Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios
- Page 41 and 42:
Capital Resources of Citigroup’s
- Page 43 and 44:
Regulatory Capital Standards Develo
- Page 45 and 46:
DepositsCiti continues to focus on
- Page 47 and 48:
Secured financing is primarily cond
- Page 49 and 50:
Each of the credit rating agencies
- Page 51 and 52:
RISK FACTORSThe ongoing implementat
- Page 53 and 54:
The emerging markets in which Citi
- Page 55 and 56:
is largely uncertain. However, any
- Page 57 and 58:
a short-term Liquidity Coverage Rat
- Page 59 and 60:
understanding or cause confusion ac
- Page 61 and 62:
MANAGING GLOBAL RISKRISK MANAGEMENT
- Page 63 and 64:
CREDIT RISKCredit risk is the poten
- Page 65 and 66:
[This page intentionally left blank
- Page 67 and 68:
(1) 2010 primarily includes an addi
- Page 69 and 70:
Non-Accrual Loans and AssetsThe tab
- Page 71 and 72:
Renegotiated LoansThe following tab
- Page 73 and 74:
Citi’s first mortgage portfolio i
- Page 75 and 76:
Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTVData
- Page 77 and 78:
Second Mortgages: December 31, 2010
- Page 79 and 80:
Interest Rate Risk Associated with
- Page 81 and 82:
North America Cards—FICO Informat
- Page 83 and 84:
CONSUMER LOAN DETAILSConsumer Loan
- Page 85 and 86:
Consumer Loan Modification Programs
- Page 87 and 88:
North America CardsNorth America ca
- Page 89 and 90:
Payment deferrals that do not conti
- Page 91 and 92:
Repurchase ReserveCiti has recorded
- Page 93 and 94:
Securities and Banking-Sponsored Pr
- Page 95 and 96:
The following table presents the co
- Page 97 and 98:
MARKET RISKMarket risk encompasses
- Page 99 and 100:
Trading PortfoliosPrice risk in tra
- Page 101 and 102:
INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS
- Page 103 and 104:
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
- Page 105 and 106:
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXP
- Page 107 and 108:
[This page intentionally left blank
- Page 109 and 110:
As required by SEC rules, the table
- Page 111 and 112:
The credit valuation adjustment amo
- Page 113 and 114:
The fair values shown are prior to
- Page 115 and 116:
Key Controls over Fair Value Measur
- Page 117 and 118:
The following table reflects the in
- Page 119 and 120:
The results of the July 1, 2010 tes
- Page 121 and 122: As a result of the losses incurred
- Page 123 and 124: MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INT
- Page 125 and 126: • an “ownership change” under
- Page 127 and 128: REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PU
- Page 129 and 130: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABL
- Page 131 and 132: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCO
- Page 133 and 134: CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET(Continue
- Page 135 and 136: CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES I
- Page 137 and 138: CITIBANK CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
- Page 139 and 140: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STA
- Page 141 and 142: Repurchase and Resale AgreementsSec
- Page 143 and 144: ecoveries are added. Securities rec
- Page 145 and 146: Consumer Mortgage Representations a
- Page 147 and 148: Transfers of Financial AssetsFor a
- Page 149 and 150: ACCOUNTING CHANGESChange in Account
- Page 151 and 152: The following table reflects the in
- Page 153 and 154: Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
- Page 155 and 156: Revisions to the Earnings-per-Share
- Page 157 and 158: FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING ST
- Page 159 and 160: 3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSSale of T
- Page 161 and 162: CitiCapitalOn July 31, 2008, Citigr
- Page 163 and 164: 5. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSEFor
- Page 165 and 166: Stock Award ProgramsCitigroup issue
- Page 167 and 168: In January 2009, members of the Man
- Page 169 and 170: Information with respect to stock o
- Page 171: 9. RETIREMENT BENEFITSThe Company h
- Page 175 and 176: A one-percentage-point change in th
- Page 177 and 178: Level 3 Roll ForwardThe reconciliat
- Page 179 and 180: 10. INCOME TAXESIn millions of doll
- Page 181 and 182: The Company is currently under audi
- Page 183 and 184: 11. EARNINGS PER SHAREThe following
- Page 185 and 186: 13. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKE
- Page 187 and 188: The table below shows the fair valu
- Page 189 and 190: Debt Securities Held-to-MaturityThe
- Page 191 and 192: Evaluating Investments for Other-Th
- Page 193 and 194: The following is a 12-month roll-fo
- Page 195 and 196: 16. LOANSCitigroup loans are report
- Page 197 and 198: Residential Mortgage Loan to Values
- Page 199 and 200: The following table presents Corpor
- Page 201 and 202: Included in the Corporate and Consu
- Page 203 and 204: 18. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETSG
- Page 205 and 206: Intangible AssetsThe components of
- Page 207 and 208: CGMHI has committed long-term finan
- Page 209 and 210: 20. Regulatory CapitalCitigroup is
- Page 211 and 212: 22. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE IN
- Page 213 and 214: In millions of dollars As of Decemb
- Page 215 and 216: Funding Commitments for Significant
- Page 217 and 218: Credit Card SecuritizationsThe Comp
- Page 219 and 220: Managed Loans—Citi HoldingsThe fo
- Page 221 and 222: Key assumptions used in measuring t
- Page 223 and 224:
Mortgage Servicing RightsIn connect
- Page 225 and 226:
The Company administers one conduit
- Page 227 and 228:
Key Assumptions and Retained Intere
- Page 229 and 230:
Municipal InvestmentsMunicipal inve
- Page 231 and 232:
Derivative NotionalsIn millions of
- Page 233 and 234:
activities together with gains and
- Page 235 and 236:
Cash Flow HedgesHedging of benchmar
- Page 237 and 238:
The range of credit derivatives sol
- Page 239 and 240:
24. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISKCo
- Page 241 and 242:
Trading account assets and liabilit
- Page 243 and 244:
The internal valuation techniques u
- Page 245 and 246:
In millions of dollars at December
- Page 247 and 248:
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Categ
- Page 249 and 250:
In millions of dollarsDecember 31,2
- Page 251 and 252:
26. FAIR VALUE ELECTIONSThe Company
- Page 253 and 254:
The following table provides inform
- Page 255 and 256:
Certain structured liabilitiesThe C
- Page 257 and 258:
28. PLEDGED SECURITIES, COLLATERAL,
- Page 259 and 260:
The repurchase reserve estimation p
- Page 261 and 262:
CollateralCash collateral available
- Page 263 and 264:
29. CONTINGENCIESOverviewIn additio
- Page 265 and 266:
pursuant to which Citigroup agreed
- Page 267 and 268:
court filings under docket number 0
- Page 269 and 270:
30. CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER’S
- Page 271 and 272:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 273 and 274:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 275 and 276:
Condensed Consolidating Balance She
- Page 277 and 278:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 279 and 280:
33. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DA
- Page 281 and 282:
SUPERVISION AND REGULATIONCitigroup
- Page 283 and 284:
Citigroup continues to evaluate its
- Page 285 and 286:
CORPORATE INFORMATIONCITIGROUP EXEC
- Page 287 and 288:
SignaturesPursuant to the requireme