The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related toCiticorp’s credit card securitizations for the years ended December 31, 2010,2009 and 2008:In billions of dollars 2010 2009 2008Proceeds from new securitizations $ — $ 16.3 $ 11.8Paydown of maturing notes (24.5) N/A N/AProceeds from collections reinvested innew receivables N/A 144.4 165.6Contractual servicing fees received N/A 1.3 1.3Cash flows received on retainedinterests and other net cash flows N/A 3.1 3.9N/A Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 167With the adoption of SFAS 167 in 2010 and resulting consolidation ofthe credit card securitization trusts, there was no residual interest in thesecuritized assets for Citicorp. Under previous accounting standards, theresidual interest was recorded at $0 for Citicorp as of December 31, 2009.Credit Card Securitizations—Citi HoldingsNo gains or losses from securitizations were recorded in 2010, since thetransfer of credit card receivables to the trust did not meet criteria for saleaccounting. The Company recorded net losses from securitization of CitiHoldings’ credit card receivables of $(586) million and $(527) million forthe years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.The following table summarizes selected cash flow information relatedto Citi Holdings’ credit card securitizations for the years ended December 31,2010, 2009 and 2008:In billions of dollars 2010 2009 2008Proceeds from new securitizations $ 5.5 $29.4 $16.9Paydown of maturing notes (15.8) N/A N/AProceeds from collections reinvestedin new receivables N/A 46.0 49.1Contractual servicing fees received N/A 0.7 0.7Cash flows received on retainedinterests and other net cash flows N/A 2.6 3.3N/A Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 167Similar to Citicorp, with the adoption of SFAS 167 in 2010 there wasno residual interest in securitized credit card receivables for Citi Holdings.Under previous accounting standards, the residual interest was recorded at$786 million as of December 31, 2009. Key assumptions used in measuringthe fair value of the residual interest at the date of sale or securitization ofCiti Holdings’ credit card receivables for the years ended December 31, 2010and 2009, respectively, are as follows:December 31,2010December 31,2009Discount rate N/A 19.7%Constant prepayment rate N/A 6.0% to 11.0%Anticipated net credit losses N/A 9.9% to 13.2%Managed LoansAs previously mentioned, prior to 2010, securitized receivables were treated assold and removed from the balance sheet. Beginning in 2010, substantiallyall securitized credit card receivables are included in the ConsolidatedBalance Sheet. Accordingly, the managed-basis (managed) presentation isonly relevant prior to 2010.After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues tomaintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicingfor receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers thesecuritized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.Managed presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managedpresentations include results from both the on-balance-sheet loans and offbalance-sheetloans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity.Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold andpresent the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as <strong>Citigroup</strong>’sowned loans. <strong>Citigroup</strong>’s management believes that managed presentationsprovide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhancecomparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating theeffects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Managementfurther believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company’s financialperformance requires an understanding of the factors underlying thatperformance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financialmeasures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusualitems that may obscure trends in <strong>Citigroup</strong>’s underlying performance.Managed Loans—CiticorpThe following tables present a reconciliation between the managed andon-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loanswhich are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries:In millions of dollars, except loans in billionsDecember 31,2010December 31,2009Loan amounts, at period endOn balance sheet $114.2 $ 44.0Securitized amounts — 71.6Total managed loans $114.2 $115.6Delinquencies, at period endOn balance sheet $2,161 $1,146Securitized amounts — 1,902Total managed delinquencies $2,161 $3,048Credit losses, net of recoveries,for the years ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008On balance sheet $ 9,950 $ 3,841 $ 2,866Securitized amounts — 6,932 4,300Total managed credit losses $ 9,950 $10,773 $ 7,166N/A Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 167The constant prepayment rate assumption range reflects the projectedpayment rates over the life of a credit card balance, excluding new cardpurchases. This results in a high payment in the early life of the securitizedbalances followed by a much lower payment rate, which is depicted in thedisclosed range.238
Managed Loans—Citi HoldingsThe following tables present a reconciliation between the managed andon-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loanswhich are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries:In millions of dollars,except loans in billionsDecember 31,2010December 31,2009Loan amounts, at period endOn balance sheet $ 52.8 $ 27.0Securitized amounts — 38.8Total managed loans $ 52.8 $ 65.8Delinquencies, at period endOn balance sheet $1,554 $1,250Securitized amounts — 1,326Total managed delinquencies $1,554 $2,576Credit losses, net of recoveries,for the years ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008On balance sheet $7,230 $4,540 $3,052Securitized amounts — 4,590 3,107Total managed credit losses $7,230 $9,130 $6,159Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinated Interests<strong>Citigroup</strong> securitizes credit card receivables through two securitizationtrusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust (Master Trust), which is part ofCiticorp, and the Citibank OMNI Master Trust (Omni Trust), which is part ofCiti Holdings. <strong>Citigroup</strong> previously securitized credit card receivables throughthe Broadway Credit Card Trust (Broadway Trust); however, this Trust wassold as part of a disposition during 2010.Master Trust issues fixed- and floating-rate term notes as well ascommercial paper (CP). Some of the term notes are issued to multi-sellercommercial paper conduits. In 2009, the Master Trust issued $4.3 billionof notes that are eligible for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility(TALF) program, where investors can borrow from the Federal Reserve usingthe trust securities as collateral. The weighted average maturity of the termnotes issued by the Master Trust was 3.4 years as of December 31, 2010 and3.6 years as of December 31, 2009. Beginning in 2010, the liabilities of thetrusts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Master Trust Liabilities (at par value)December 31,2010December 31,2009In billions of dollarsTerm notes issued to multi-sellerCP conduits $ 0.3 $ 0.8Term notes issued to third parties 41.8 51.2Term notes retained by<strong>Citigroup</strong> affiliates 3.4 5.0Commercial paper — 14.5Total Master Trustliabilities $45.5 $71.5The Omni Trust issues fixed- and floating-rate term notes, some of whichare purchased by multi-seller commercial paper conduits. The Omni Trustalso issues commercial paper. During 2009, a portion of the Omni Trustcommercial paper had been purchased by the Federal Reserve CommercialPaper Funding Facility (CPFF). In addition, some of the multi-seller conduitsthat hold Omni Trust term notes had placed commercial paper with the CPFF.No Omni Trust liabilities were funded through the CPFF as of December 31,2010. The total amount of Omni Trust liabilities funded directly or indirectlythrough the CPFF was $2.5 billion at December 31, 2009.The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued bythe Omni Trust was 1.8 years as of December 31, 2010 and 2.5 years as ofDecember 31, 2009.Omni Trust Liabilities (at par value)In billions of dollarsDecember 31,2010December 31,2009Term notes issued to multi-sellerCP conduits $ 7.2 $13.1Term notes issued to third parties 9.2 9.2Term notes retained by<strong>Citigroup</strong> affiliates 7.1 9.8Commercial paper — 4.4Total Omni Trust liabilities $23.5 $36.5Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. is the sole provider of full liquidity facilitiesto the commercial paper programs of the Master and Omni Trusts. Bothof these facilities, which represent contractual obligations on the part ofCitibank (South Dakota), N.A. to provide liquidity for the issued commercialpaper, are made available on market terms to each of the trusts. The liquidityfacilities require Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase the commercialpaper issued by each trust at maturity, if the commercial paper does notroll over, as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding,typically in the form of subordinated notes. As there was no Omni Trust orMaster Trust commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2010, therewas no liquidity commitment at that time. The liquidity commitment relatedto the Omni Trust commercial paper programs amounted to $4.4 billion atDecember 31, 2009. The liquidity commitment related to the Master Trustcommercial paper program amounted to $14.5 billion at December 31, 2009.As of December 31, 2009, none of the Omni Trust or Master Trust liquiditycommitments were drawn.239
- Page 1 and 2:
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANG
- Page 3 and 4:
CITIGROUP’S 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON
- Page 5 and 6:
As described above, Citigroup is ma
- Page 7 and 8:
Operating ExpensesCitigroup operati
- Page 9 and 10:
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINAN
- Page 11 and 12:
CITIGROUP REVENUESIn millions of do
- Page 13 and 14:
REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKINGRegional C
- Page 15 and 16:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 17 and 18:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 19 and 20:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 21 and 22:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 23 and 24:
SECURITIES AND BANKINGSecurities an
- Page 25 and 26:
TRANSACTION SERVICESTransaction Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENTBroke
- Page 29 and 30:
Japan Consumer FinanceCitigroup con
- Page 31 and 32:
The following table provides detail
- Page 33 and 34:
CORPORATE/OTHERCorporate/Other incl
- Page 35 and 36:
During 2010, average Consumer loans
- Page 37 and 38:
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 3
- Page 39 and 40:
Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios
- Page 41 and 42:
Capital Resources of Citigroup’s
- Page 43 and 44:
Regulatory Capital Standards Develo
- Page 45 and 46:
DepositsCiti continues to focus on
- Page 47 and 48:
Secured financing is primarily cond
- Page 49 and 50:
Each of the credit rating agencies
- Page 51 and 52:
RISK FACTORSThe ongoing implementat
- Page 53 and 54:
The emerging markets in which Citi
- Page 55 and 56:
is largely uncertain. However, any
- Page 57 and 58:
a short-term Liquidity Coverage Rat
- Page 59 and 60:
understanding or cause confusion ac
- Page 61 and 62:
MANAGING GLOBAL RISKRISK MANAGEMENT
- Page 63 and 64:
CREDIT RISKCredit risk is the poten
- Page 65 and 66:
[This page intentionally left blank
- Page 67 and 68:
(1) 2010 primarily includes an addi
- Page 69 and 70:
Non-Accrual Loans and AssetsThe tab
- Page 71 and 72:
Renegotiated LoansThe following tab
- Page 73 and 74:
Citi’s first mortgage portfolio i
- Page 75 and 76:
Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTVData
- Page 77 and 78:
Second Mortgages: December 31, 2010
- Page 79 and 80:
Interest Rate Risk Associated with
- Page 81 and 82:
North America Cards—FICO Informat
- Page 83 and 84:
CONSUMER LOAN DETAILSConsumer Loan
- Page 85 and 86:
Consumer Loan Modification Programs
- Page 87 and 88:
North America CardsNorth America ca
- Page 89 and 90:
Payment deferrals that do not conti
- Page 91 and 92:
Repurchase ReserveCiti has recorded
- Page 93 and 94:
Securities and Banking-Sponsored Pr
- Page 95 and 96:
The following table presents the co
- Page 97 and 98:
MARKET RISKMarket risk encompasses
- Page 99 and 100:
Trading PortfoliosPrice risk in tra
- Page 101 and 102:
INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS
- Page 103 and 104:
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
- Page 105 and 106:
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXP
- Page 107 and 108:
[This page intentionally left blank
- Page 109 and 110:
As required by SEC rules, the table
- Page 111 and 112:
The credit valuation adjustment amo
- Page 113 and 114:
The fair values shown are prior to
- Page 115 and 116:
Key Controls over Fair Value Measur
- Page 117 and 118:
The following table reflects the in
- Page 119 and 120:
The results of the July 1, 2010 tes
- Page 121 and 122:
As a result of the losses incurred
- Page 123 and 124:
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INT
- Page 125 and 126:
• an “ownership change” under
- Page 127 and 128:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PU
- Page 129 and 130:
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABL
- Page 131 and 132:
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCO
- Page 133 and 134:
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET(Continue
- Page 135 and 136:
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES I
- Page 137 and 138:
CITIBANK CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
- Page 139 and 140:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STA
- Page 141 and 142:
Repurchase and Resale AgreementsSec
- Page 143 and 144:
ecoveries are added. Securities rec
- Page 145 and 146:
Consumer Mortgage Representations a
- Page 147 and 148:
Transfers of Financial AssetsFor a
- Page 149 and 150:
ACCOUNTING CHANGESChange in Account
- Page 151 and 152:
The following table reflects the in
- Page 153 and 154:
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
- Page 155 and 156:
Revisions to the Earnings-per-Share
- Page 157 and 158:
FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING ST
- Page 159 and 160:
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSSale of T
- Page 161 and 162:
CitiCapitalOn July 31, 2008, Citigr
- Page 163 and 164:
5. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSEFor
- Page 165 and 166:
Stock Award ProgramsCitigroup issue
- Page 167 and 168: In January 2009, members of the Man
- Page 169 and 170: Information with respect to stock o
- Page 171 and 172: 9. RETIREMENT BENEFITSThe Company h
- Page 173 and 174: The following table shows the chang
- Page 175 and 176: A one-percentage-point change in th
- Page 177 and 178: Level 3 Roll ForwardThe reconciliat
- Page 179 and 180: 10. INCOME TAXESIn millions of doll
- Page 181 and 182: The Company is currently under audi
- Page 183 and 184: 11. EARNINGS PER SHAREThe following
- Page 185 and 186: 13. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKE
- Page 187 and 188: The table below shows the fair valu
- Page 189 and 190: Debt Securities Held-to-MaturityThe
- Page 191 and 192: Evaluating Investments for Other-Th
- Page 193 and 194: The following is a 12-month roll-fo
- Page 195 and 196: 16. LOANSCitigroup loans are report
- Page 197 and 198: Residential Mortgage Loan to Values
- Page 199 and 200: The following table presents Corpor
- Page 201 and 202: Included in the Corporate and Consu
- Page 203 and 204: 18. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETSG
- Page 205 and 206: Intangible AssetsThe components of
- Page 207 and 208: CGMHI has committed long-term finan
- Page 209 and 210: 20. Regulatory CapitalCitigroup is
- Page 211 and 212: 22. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE IN
- Page 213 and 214: In millions of dollars As of Decemb
- Page 215 and 216: Funding Commitments for Significant
- Page 217: Credit Card SecuritizationsThe Comp
- Page 221 and 222: Key assumptions used in measuring t
- Page 223 and 224: Mortgage Servicing RightsIn connect
- Page 225 and 226: The Company administers one conduit
- Page 227 and 228: Key Assumptions and Retained Intere
- Page 229 and 230: Municipal InvestmentsMunicipal inve
- Page 231 and 232: Derivative NotionalsIn millions of
- Page 233 and 234: activities together with gains and
- Page 235 and 236: Cash Flow HedgesHedging of benchmar
- Page 237 and 238: The range of credit derivatives sol
- Page 239 and 240: 24. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISKCo
- Page 241 and 242: Trading account assets and liabilit
- Page 243 and 244: The internal valuation techniques u
- Page 245 and 246: In millions of dollars at December
- Page 247 and 248: Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Categ
- Page 249 and 250: In millions of dollarsDecember 31,2
- Page 251 and 252: 26. FAIR VALUE ELECTIONSThe Company
- Page 253 and 254: The following table provides inform
- Page 255 and 256: Certain structured liabilitiesThe C
- Page 257 and 258: 28. PLEDGED SECURITIES, COLLATERAL,
- Page 259 and 260: The repurchase reserve estimation p
- Page 261 and 262: CollateralCash collateral available
- Page 263 and 264: 29. CONTINGENCIESOverviewIn additio
- Page 265 and 266: pursuant to which Citigroup agreed
- Page 267 and 268: court filings under docket number 0
- Page 269 and 270:
30. CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER’S
- Page 271 and 272:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 273 and 274:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 275 and 276:
Condensed Consolidating Balance She
- Page 277 and 278:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 279 and 280:
33. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DA
- Page 281 and 282:
SUPERVISION AND REGULATIONCitigroup
- Page 283 and 284:
Citigroup continues to evaluate its
- Page 285 and 286:
CORPORATE INFORMATIONCITIGROUP EXEC
- Page 287 and 288:
SignaturesPursuant to the requireme