With respect to the New York NOLs, the Company has recorded a netdeferred tax asset of $1.1 billion, along with less significant net operatinglosses in various other states for which the Company has recorded a netdeferred tax asset of $0.6 billion and which expire between 2012 and2031. In addition, the Company has recorded deferred tax assets in foreignsubsidiaries, for which an assertion has been made that the earningsare indefinitely reinvested, for foreign net operating loss carryforwardsof $487 million (which expire in 2012–2019) and $60 million (with noexpiration), respectively.Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that therealization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $52.1 billion is morelikely than not based upon expectations as to future taxable income in thejurisdictions in which the DTAs arise and available tax planning strategies,as defined in ASC 740, <strong>Inc</strong>ome Taxes, (formerly SFAS 109) that would beimplemented, if necessary, to prevent a carryforward from expiring. <strong>Inc</strong>ludedin the net U.S. federal DTA of $41.6 billion are $4 billion in DTLs that willreverse in the relevant carryforward period and may be used to support theDTA, and $0.3 billion in compensation deductions that reduced additionalpaid-in capital in January 2011 and for which no adjustment was permittedto such DTA at December 31, 2010 because the related stock compensationwas not yet deductible to Citi. In general, the Company would need togenerate approximately $105 billion of taxable income during the respectivecarryforward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTAs.As a result of the losses incurred in 2008 and 2009, the Company isin a three-year cumulative pretax loss position at December 31, 2010. Acumulative loss position is considered significant negative evidence inassessing the realizability of a DTA. The Company has concluded thatthere is sufficient positive evidence to overcome this negative evidence. Thepositive evidence includes two means by which the Company is able to fullyrealize its DTA. First, the Company forecasts sufficient taxable income in thecarryforward period, exclusive of tax planning strategies, even under stressedscenarios. Secondly, the Company has sufficient tax planning strategies,including potential sales of businesses and assets, in which it could realizethe excess of appreciated value over the tax basis of its assets. The amountof the DTA considered realizable, however, is necessarily subject to theCompany’s estimates of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which itoperates during the respective carryforward periods, which is in turn subjectto overall market and global economic conditions.Based upon the foregoing discussion, as well as tax planningopportunities and other factors discussed below, the U.S. federal and NewYork State and City net operating loss carryforward period of 20 years providesenough time to utilize the DTAs pertaining to the existing net operating losscarryforwards and any NOL that would be created by the reversal of the futurenet deductions that have not yet been taken on a tax return.The U.S. foreign tax credit carryforward period is 10 years. In addition,utilization of foreign tax credits in any year is restricted to 35% of foreignsource taxable income in that year. Further, overall domestic losses thatthe Company has incurred of approximately $47 billion are allowed to bereclassified as foreign source income to the extent of 50% of domestic sourceincome produced in subsequent years and such resulting foreign sourceincome is in fact sufficient to cover the foreign tax credits being carriedforward. As such, the foreign source taxable income limitation will not bean impediment to the foreign tax credit carryforward usage as long as theCompany can generate sufficient domestic taxable income within the 10-yearcarryforward period. Under U.S. tax law, NOL carry-forwards must generallybe used against taxable income before foreign tax credits (FTCs) or generalbusiness credits (GBCs) can be utilized.Regarding the estimate of future taxable income, the Company hasprojected its pretax earnings predominantly based upon the “core”businesses in Citicorp that the Company intends to conduct going forward.These “core” businesses have produced steady and strong earnings in thepast. In 2010, operating trends were positive and credit costs improved. TheCompany has already taken steps to reduce its cost structure. Taking theseitems into account, the Company is projecting that it will generate sufficientpretax earnings within the 10-year carryforward period alluded to aboveto be able to fully utilize the foreign tax credit carryforward, in addition toany foreign tax credits produced in such period. Until the U.S. federal NOLcarryforward is fully utilized, the FTCs and GBCs will likely continue toincrease. The Company’s net DTA will decline as additional domestic GAAPtaxable income is generated.The Company has also examined tax planning strategies available toit in accordance with ASC 740 that would be employed, if necessary, toprevent a carryforward from expiring. These strategies include repatriatinglow-taxed foreign source earnings for which an assertion that the earningsare indefinitely reinvested has not been made, accelerating U.S. taxableincome into or deferring U.S. tax deductions out of the latter years of thecarryforward period (e.g., selling appreciated intangible assets and electingstraight-line depreciation), accelerating deductible temporary differencesoutside the U.S., holding onto available-for-sale debt securities with lossesuntil they mature and selling certain assets that produce tax exempt income,while purchasing assets that produce fully taxable income. In addition,the sale or restructuring of certain businesses can produce significant U.S.taxable income within the relevant carryforward periods.The Company’s ability to utilize its DTAs to offset future taxable incomemay be significantly limited if the Company experiences an “ownershipchange,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, asamended (the “Code”). In general, an ownership change will occur if thereis a cumulative change in the Company’s ownership by “5% shareholders”(as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rollingthree-year period. A corporation that experiences an ownership change willgenerally be subject to an annual limitation on its pre-ownership changeDTAs equal to the value of the corporation immediately before the ownershipchange, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate (subject to certainadjustments), provided that the annual limitation would be increasedeach year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year.The limitation arising from an ownership change under Section 382 on<strong>Citigroup</strong>’s ability to utilize its DTAs will depend on the value of <strong>Citigroup</strong>’sstock at the time of the ownership change. Under IRS Notice 2010-2,<strong>Citigroup</strong> did not experience an ownership change within the meaningof Section 382 as a result of the sales of its common stock held by theU.S. Treasury.202
11. EARNINGS PER SHAREThe following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations for the years endedDecember 31:In millions, except per-share amounts 2010 2009 2008 (1)<strong>Inc</strong>ome (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $ 10,951 $ (1,066) $(32,029)Noncontrolling interests from continuing operations 329 95 (343)Net income (loss) from continuing operations (for EPS purposes) $ 10,622 $ (1,161) $(31,686)<strong>Inc</strong>ome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes (68) (445) 4,002Noncontrolling interest from discontinuing operations (48) — —<strong>Citigroup</strong>’s net income (loss) $ 10,602 $ (1,606) $(27,684)Impact of the public and private preferred stock exchange offers — (3,242) —Preferred dividends (9) (2,988) (1,695)Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance — (1,285) —Preferred stock Series H discount accretion — (123) (37)Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ 10,593 $ (9,244) $(29,416)Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities (90) (2) (221)Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders for basic EPS (2) $ 10,503 $ (9,246) $(29,637)Effect of dilutive securities 2 540 877Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders for diluted EPS (2) $ 10,505 $ (8,706) $(28,760)Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS 28,776.0 11,568.3 5,265.4Effect of dilutive securitiesConvertible securities 0.7 312.3 503.2Other employee plans 19.8 0.2 —Options 3.7 0.2 0.3TDECs 877.9 218.3 —Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS (3) 29,678.1 12,099.3 5,768.9Basic earnings per share<strong>Inc</strong>ome (loss) from continuing operations $ 0.37 $ (0.76) $ (6.39)Discontinued operations (0.01) (0.04) 0.76Net income (loss) $ 0.36 $ (0.80) $ (5.63)Diluted earnings per share (2)(3)<strong>Inc</strong>ome (loss) from continuing operations $ 0.35 $ (0.76) $ (6.39)Discontinued operations — (0.04) 0.76Net income (loss) $ 0.35 $ (0.80) $ (5.63)(1) The Company adopted ASC 260-10-45 to 65 (FSP EITF 03-6-1) on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current period’s presentation.(2) Due to the net loss available to common shareholders in 2009 and 2008, loss available to common stockholders for basic EPS was used to calculate diluted EPS. Adding back the effect of dilutive securities wouldresult in anti-dilution.(3) Due to the net loss available to common shareholders in 2009 and 2008, basic shares were used to calculate diluted EPS. Adding dilutive securities to the denominator would result in anti-dilution.During 2010, 2009, and 2008, weighted-average options to purchase386.1 million, 165.6 million and 169.7 million shares of common stock,respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation ofearnings per common share, because the weighted-average exercise prices of$10.29, $31.57 and $41.92, respectively, were greater than the average marketprice of the Company’s common stock.Warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Troubled Asset ReliefProgram (TARP) and the loss-sharing agreement, with exercise prices of$17.85 and $10.61 for approximately 210 million and 255 million sharesof common stock, respectively, were not included in the computationof earnings per common share in 2010 and 2009, because they wereanti-dilutive.Equity awards granted under the Management Committee Long-Term<strong>Inc</strong>entive Plan (MC LTIP) were not included in the 2009 computation ofearnings per common share, because the performance targets under theterms of the awards were not met and, as a result, the awards expired in thefirst quarter of 2010. In addition, the other performance-based equity awardsof approximately 5 million shares were not included in the 2010 and 2009earnings per share calculation, because the performance targets under theterms of the awards were not met.Equity units convertible into approximately 118 million shares and235 million shares of <strong>Citigroup</strong> common stock held by the Abu DhabiInvestment Authority (ADIA) were not included in the computation ofearnings per common share in 2010 and 2009, respectively, because theexercise price of $31.83 was greater than the average market price of theCompany’s common stock.203
- Page 1 and 2:
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANG
- Page 3 and 4:
CITIGROUP’S 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON
- Page 5 and 6:
As described above, Citigroup is ma
- Page 7 and 8:
Operating ExpensesCitigroup operati
- Page 9 and 10:
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINAN
- Page 11 and 12:
CITIGROUP REVENUESIn millions of do
- Page 13 and 14:
REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKINGRegional C
- Page 15 and 16:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 17 and 18:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 19 and 20:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 21 and 22:
2009 vs. 2008Revenues, net of inter
- Page 23 and 24:
SECURITIES AND BANKINGSecurities an
- Page 25 and 26:
TRANSACTION SERVICESTransaction Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENTBroke
- Page 29 and 30:
Japan Consumer FinanceCitigroup con
- Page 31 and 32:
The following table provides detail
- Page 33 and 34:
CORPORATE/OTHERCorporate/Other incl
- Page 35 and 36:
During 2010, average Consumer loans
- Page 37 and 38:
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 3
- Page 39 and 40:
Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios
- Page 41 and 42:
Capital Resources of Citigroup’s
- Page 43 and 44:
Regulatory Capital Standards Develo
- Page 45 and 46:
DepositsCiti continues to focus on
- Page 47 and 48:
Secured financing is primarily cond
- Page 49 and 50:
Each of the credit rating agencies
- Page 51 and 52:
RISK FACTORSThe ongoing implementat
- Page 53 and 54:
The emerging markets in which Citi
- Page 55 and 56:
is largely uncertain. However, any
- Page 57 and 58:
a short-term Liquidity Coverage Rat
- Page 59 and 60:
understanding or cause confusion ac
- Page 61 and 62:
MANAGING GLOBAL RISKRISK MANAGEMENT
- Page 63 and 64:
CREDIT RISKCredit risk is the poten
- Page 65 and 66:
[This page intentionally left blank
- Page 67 and 68:
(1) 2010 primarily includes an addi
- Page 69 and 70:
Non-Accrual Loans and AssetsThe tab
- Page 71 and 72:
Renegotiated LoansThe following tab
- Page 73 and 74:
Citi’s first mortgage portfolio i
- Page 75 and 76:
Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTVData
- Page 77 and 78:
Second Mortgages: December 31, 2010
- Page 79 and 80:
Interest Rate Risk Associated with
- Page 81 and 82:
North America Cards—FICO Informat
- Page 83 and 84:
CONSUMER LOAN DETAILSConsumer Loan
- Page 85 and 86:
Consumer Loan Modification Programs
- Page 87 and 88:
North America CardsNorth America ca
- Page 89 and 90:
Payment deferrals that do not conti
- Page 91 and 92:
Repurchase ReserveCiti has recorded
- Page 93 and 94:
Securities and Banking-Sponsored Pr
- Page 95 and 96:
The following table presents the co
- Page 97 and 98:
MARKET RISKMarket risk encompasses
- Page 99 and 100:
Trading PortfoliosPrice risk in tra
- Page 101 and 102:
INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS
- Page 103 and 104:
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
- Page 105 and 106:
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXP
- Page 107 and 108:
[This page intentionally left blank
- Page 109 and 110:
As required by SEC rules, the table
- Page 111 and 112:
The credit valuation adjustment amo
- Page 113 and 114:
The fair values shown are prior to
- Page 115 and 116:
Key Controls over Fair Value Measur
- Page 117 and 118:
The following table reflects the in
- Page 119 and 120:
The results of the July 1, 2010 tes
- Page 121 and 122:
As a result of the losses incurred
- Page 123 and 124:
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INT
- Page 125 and 126:
• an “ownership change” under
- Page 127 and 128:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PU
- Page 129 and 130:
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABL
- Page 131 and 132: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCO
- Page 133 and 134: CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET(Continue
- Page 135 and 136: CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES I
- Page 137 and 138: CITIBANK CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
- Page 139 and 140: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STA
- Page 141 and 142: Repurchase and Resale AgreementsSec
- Page 143 and 144: ecoveries are added. Securities rec
- Page 145 and 146: Consumer Mortgage Representations a
- Page 147 and 148: Transfers of Financial AssetsFor a
- Page 149 and 150: ACCOUNTING CHANGESChange in Account
- Page 151 and 152: The following table reflects the in
- Page 153 and 154: Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
- Page 155 and 156: Revisions to the Earnings-per-Share
- Page 157 and 158: FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING ST
- Page 159 and 160: 3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSSale of T
- Page 161 and 162: CitiCapitalOn July 31, 2008, Citigr
- Page 163 and 164: 5. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSEFor
- Page 165 and 166: Stock Award ProgramsCitigroup issue
- Page 167 and 168: In January 2009, members of the Man
- Page 169 and 170: Information with respect to stock o
- Page 171 and 172: 9. RETIREMENT BENEFITSThe Company h
- Page 173 and 174: The following table shows the chang
- Page 175 and 176: A one-percentage-point change in th
- Page 177 and 178: Level 3 Roll ForwardThe reconciliat
- Page 179 and 180: 10. INCOME TAXESIn millions of doll
- Page 181: The Company is currently under audi
- Page 185 and 186: 13. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKE
- Page 187 and 188: The table below shows the fair valu
- Page 189 and 190: Debt Securities Held-to-MaturityThe
- Page 191 and 192: Evaluating Investments for Other-Th
- Page 193 and 194: The following is a 12-month roll-fo
- Page 195 and 196: 16. LOANSCitigroup loans are report
- Page 197 and 198: Residential Mortgage Loan to Values
- Page 199 and 200: The following table presents Corpor
- Page 201 and 202: Included in the Corporate and Consu
- Page 203 and 204: 18. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETSG
- Page 205 and 206: Intangible AssetsThe components of
- Page 207 and 208: CGMHI has committed long-term finan
- Page 209 and 210: 20. Regulatory CapitalCitigroup is
- Page 211 and 212: 22. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE IN
- Page 213 and 214: In millions of dollars As of Decemb
- Page 215 and 216: Funding Commitments for Significant
- Page 217 and 218: Credit Card SecuritizationsThe Comp
- Page 219 and 220: Managed Loans—Citi HoldingsThe fo
- Page 221 and 222: Key assumptions used in measuring t
- Page 223 and 224: Mortgage Servicing RightsIn connect
- Page 225 and 226: The Company administers one conduit
- Page 227 and 228: Key Assumptions and Retained Intere
- Page 229 and 230: Municipal InvestmentsMunicipal inve
- Page 231 and 232: Derivative NotionalsIn millions of
- Page 233 and 234:
activities together with gains and
- Page 235 and 236:
Cash Flow HedgesHedging of benchmar
- Page 237 and 238:
The range of credit derivatives sol
- Page 239 and 240:
24. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISKCo
- Page 241 and 242:
Trading account assets and liabilit
- Page 243 and 244:
The internal valuation techniques u
- Page 245 and 246:
In millions of dollars at December
- Page 247 and 248:
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Categ
- Page 249 and 250:
In millions of dollarsDecember 31,2
- Page 251 and 252:
26. FAIR VALUE ELECTIONSThe Company
- Page 253 and 254:
The following table provides inform
- Page 255 and 256:
Certain structured liabilitiesThe C
- Page 257 and 258:
28. PLEDGED SECURITIES, COLLATERAL,
- Page 259 and 260:
The repurchase reserve estimation p
- Page 261 and 262:
CollateralCash collateral available
- Page 263 and 264:
29. CONTINGENCIESOverviewIn additio
- Page 265 and 266:
pursuant to which Citigroup agreed
- Page 267 and 268:
court filings under docket number 0
- Page 269 and 270:
30. CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER’S
- Page 271 and 272:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 273 and 274:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 275 and 276:
Condensed Consolidating Balance She
- Page 277 and 278:
Condensed Consolidating Statements
- Page 279 and 280:
33. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DA
- Page 281 and 282:
SUPERVISION AND REGULATIONCitigroup
- Page 283 and 284:
Citigroup continues to evaluate its
- Page 285 and 286:
CORPORATE INFORMATIONCITIGROUP EXEC
- Page 287 and 288:
SignaturesPursuant to the requireme