12.07.2015 Views

Practice of Kinetics (Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, Volume 1)

Practice of Kinetics (Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, Volume 1)

Practice of Kinetics (Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, Volume 1)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

392 TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL DATAtion times intermediate between the initial and final values. The basic reason forthis is that the integrated expressions for reactions other than the simple firstorder case discussed above require the values <strong>of</strong> the initial concentrations. Thus,if these data are not available, absolute values <strong>of</strong> the rate coefficients cannot becalculated.However, if we consider reactions in which the order with respect to the secondreactant B is zero or in which the concentration <strong>of</strong> the second reactant is in suchlarge excess that its time dependence can be neglected, it is possible to manipulatethe integrated rate equations so as to give a numerical value <strong>of</strong> the rate coefficientinvolving the dimensions <strong>of</strong> A [see eqn. (80)] and/or [B],. Two simple exampleswill suffice to make this clearer. Firstly, suppose we have a reaction which is firstorder with respect to A and first order with respect to B and suppose we can arrangeour conditions so that B is in considerable excess <strong>of</strong> A even though we may notactually know the value <strong>of</strong> [B],. Then we may apply either the Guggenheim orMangelsdorf methods to obtain the product <strong>of</strong> the second order rate coefficientand [B], . For the second example, consider a reaction which is second order withrespect to A and zero order with respect to B. The integrated form <strong>of</strong> the rateexpression for this case is eqn. (38), namely1- -1 = k[A]o(t-to)awhich in terms <strong>of</strong> the physical property 4 becomesk= - (t-to)4t-4m 40-4m A---1 1We may regard this equation as containing three unknowns: (4,-~$~), andk/A. Therefore, by taking any three pairs <strong>of</strong> (t, c$t) values, we can eliminate two<strong>of</strong> these unknowns to find the third. Thus if we eliminate rPm and (40-4m), weobtain k/A (but not k). The computations are simpler if we take three observations<strong>of</strong> 4 separated by equal time intervals, thus: $t, $,+,, 4t+Zz. The value <strong>of</strong> k/A isgiven 3* byClearly from a succession <strong>of</strong> triads, we can calculate a series <strong>of</strong> values <strong>of</strong> k/A if wewish. We shall not pursue this method any further except to point out that thereare problems to be solved concerning the optimum value <strong>of</strong>t and the method<strong>of</strong> averaging the set <strong>of</strong> k/A values. Obvbusly there is no real need to use observationsat equally spaced time intervals to eliminate two <strong>of</strong> our three unknowns andso obtain a value <strong>of</strong> k/A; this problem has been examined by Sturtevant'.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!