12.07.2015 Views

Report of the Tiger Task Force - PRS

Report of the Tiger Task Force - PRS

Report of the Tiger Task Force - PRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE DOTS ■Fringe villagesA pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people on <strong>the</strong> fringe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forestand inside each park:BuxaAccording to <strong>the</strong> 1991 census, 15,608 peopleinhabit forest villages and fixed demand holdingswithin <strong>the</strong> protected area. In 1996, according to aWorld Bank project report, <strong>the</strong>re were 37 forestvillages inside <strong>the</strong> reserve’s boundaries, and eightwithin <strong>the</strong> park. The report also mentions 44revenue villages, with a population <strong>of</strong> 84,648 (1991census). The project decided to target 36,000 <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se for ecodevelopment.RanthambhoreIn 1996, <strong>the</strong> national consultants to IndiaEcodevelopment Project identified 211,695 peoplewithin 10 km <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserve to be included in <strong>the</strong>project. But <strong>the</strong> project authorities <strong>the</strong>n reduced <strong>the</strong>numbers <strong>the</strong>y wanted to work with to 64,000.Before this, Worldwide Fund for Nature-India(1994) had identified 85,000 people, in 85 villages,for possible inclusion in ecodevelopmentactivities. The project realised that it would alsohave to deal with major urban settlements nearreserve boundaries, as in <strong>the</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> SawaiMadhopur, Khandar and Karauli (combinedpopulation <strong>of</strong> 82,000).GirOver 70,000 people were surveyed to be living in<strong>the</strong> intended project area during <strong>the</strong> 1981 census.The protected area authorities identified apopulation <strong>of</strong> 72,000 within a two-km radius <strong>of</strong>park boundaries, in 97 revenue villages, forparticipation in ecodevelopment. Within <strong>the</strong> parkitself, 54 pastoral settlements or 'nesses' inhabitedby 2,540 Maldharis; 14 forest villages with apopulation <strong>of</strong> 4,500 residents including 239 Siddis,a scheduled tribe <strong>of</strong> African origin; and threetemple complexes occupied by 65 people, wereidentified.NagarholeThe total population in <strong>the</strong> project area was 72,652as per <strong>the</strong> 1981 census. Within a five-km radius <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> boundary, <strong>the</strong> protected area authoritiesidentified a population <strong>of</strong> 66,507 in 96 revenuevillages, for participation in project activities.PalamauThree villages were recorded in <strong>the</strong> core zone.According to <strong>the</strong> 1991 census data, 30,795 people,in 102 villages, were located within legallyexcluded enclaves in <strong>the</strong> sanctuary’s buffer area.Ano<strong>the</strong>r 89 villages within a five-km radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sanctuary were selected to participate inecodevelopment activities, to give a totalpopulation <strong>of</strong> 75,000 targeted for this project.PenchThe 1981 census counted 50,000 people in <strong>the</strong>intended project area (99 revenue villages).Findings from <strong>the</strong> participatory research carriedout in over 10 villages around <strong>the</strong> national parksuggest that 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> families suffered fromvarying degrees <strong>of</strong> poverty, and that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sefamilies belong to scheduled tribes.PeriyarWhile <strong>the</strong> protected area authorities and <strong>the</strong>national consultants (Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> PublicAdministration) identified a population <strong>of</strong>225,000 according to <strong>the</strong> 1981 census within twokm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserve for inclusion in <strong>the</strong> project. TheBank suggested that <strong>the</strong> project planners need toreduce <strong>the</strong> target population to a more manageablesize. A revised target population <strong>of</strong> 58,144 in <strong>the</strong>selected villages within <strong>the</strong> two-km radius waschosen.department protect <strong>the</strong> forest: among o<strong>the</strong>r ways, byhelping department frontline staff in patrolling;ga<strong>the</strong>ring intelligence on poaching; preventing cattlefrom grazing in parks, and whatever else <strong>the</strong> forestdepartment suggested. In practice, all <strong>the</strong>se couldhappen only after mutual agreement among allstakeholders.Each ecodevelopment committee member wasallocated Rs 10,000 against which he or she would<strong>the</strong>n contribute 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs, or Rs 2,500.The money could <strong>the</strong>n be used to invest in differentschemes and productive assets, ei<strong>the</strong>r at individuallevels or at community basis. 12 The money could<strong>the</strong>n generate, as <strong>the</strong> World Bank and <strong>the</strong>government put it, livelihoods reducing <strong>the</strong> impact<strong>of</strong> people on <strong>the</strong> forest. 13 On its part, <strong>the</strong> forestdepartment would improve its functioning, andensure better protection <strong>of</strong> parks: project fundsallowed purchase and construction <strong>of</strong> infrastructureand better equipment for park <strong>of</strong>ficers and staff(computers, boats, Geographical InformationSystems s<strong>of</strong>tware, and vehicles).Ecodevelopment as envisaged earlierThe idea <strong>of</strong> ecodevelopment entered conservationdiscourse in India in 1983, when <strong>the</strong> Indian BoardThe way ahead 123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!