TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE DOTS ■handled by <strong>the</strong> director, Project <strong>Tiger</strong>, it isessential to streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> directorate withautonomy and personnel.6. The director, Project <strong>Tiger</strong>, should be delegatedpowers to deal with states under Section (3) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, especially for <strong>the</strong>enforcement <strong>of</strong> Project <strong>Tiger</strong> guidelines.7. The role <strong>of</strong> director, Project <strong>Tiger</strong>, should not beconfined to tiger reserves. Instead, it shouldextend to o<strong>the</strong>r crucial forest areas as well whichhave viable tiger populations.8. A state steering committee for Project <strong>Tiger</strong>should be created, with <strong>the</strong> chief minister <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>tiger range state as its chair.9. Management committees should be set up for eachprotected area. These committees will include localcommunity representatives, NGOs and researchers.10. Create a sub-cadre <strong>of</strong> wildlife specialists andpr<strong>of</strong>essionals.11. Independent audits <strong>of</strong> each reserve must beconducted annually; <strong>the</strong> information generatedmust be placed in <strong>the</strong> public domain.12. Build collaborative networks with researchers tomonitor change.Protection1. Each reserve must have a specific and detailedstrategy for protection. The independentmonitoring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserve must include anassessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enforcement mechanisms inplace and <strong>the</strong> patrolling efforts <strong>of</strong> field staff, sothat policy interventions can be designed.3. A clear strategy for protection is needed in<strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern reserves, where local people willbe <strong>the</strong> only ones capable <strong>of</strong> traversing andprotecting <strong>the</strong> area. There should also be a clearstrategy for <strong>the</strong> reserves controlled by naxalitesand o<strong>the</strong>r insurgent groups, where armedintervention by security forces might be <strong>the</strong> onlyoption.4. Fur<strong>the</strong>r recruitment <strong>of</strong> staff — foresters as well asguards — should be reserved for local villagers.The criterion for recruitment should be amendedso that it relaxes <strong>the</strong> formal educationalqualifications needed for <strong>the</strong>se positions andinstead, values skills in jungle craft. In addition,<strong>the</strong>re should be provision for in-service trainingfor locally recruited staff.5. Institutionalise training so that each reserve hasskilled and committed personnel.6. Disincentives and rewards based on independentmonitoring should be built into <strong>the</strong> system. Theincentives must be withdrawn in reserves thatscore low on <strong>the</strong> rating chart. This should be donewith complete transparency so that it is not seenas political or discriminatory. In fact, this movewill be a test for <strong>the</strong> independence and rigour <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> independent assessment as well.7. Investments in basic facilities should be made for<strong>the</strong> frontline staff:a. Housing camps in neighbouring districttowns, usually where <strong>the</strong> project headquarteris based, for families so that <strong>the</strong> education <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir children can be secured;b. Free rations for guards living in <strong>the</strong> camps.This practice is followed by many protectionforces and helps in <strong>the</strong>ir work.8. A staff welfare fund can be created for eachreserve, out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> income from tourism. This canbe used to supplement medical and o<strong>the</strong>r benefitsfor <strong>the</strong> staff.9. There must be an urgent review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crisis inforestry services and steps that have been taken toaddress issues <strong>of</strong> training, personnel development,staff reviews and salaries.International trade in wildlife products1. Very proactive and strong measures are needed on<strong>the</strong> matter <strong>of</strong> international trade in wildlife andwildlife products. The Union ministry must workto shape <strong>the</strong> agenda at <strong>the</strong> Convention onInternational Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong>Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to ensure that <strong>the</strong>global market for tiger products is investigated.The international community must be put underpressure to combat and destroy this trade.2. A bilateral relationship must be built up withChina to combat <strong>the</strong> trade in tiger parts. Theenvironment minister should take <strong>the</strong> lead bydiscussing and developing this relationship withhis Chinese counterpart, and this dialogue mustbe kept alive and ongoing. It is critical that Indiatakes <strong>the</strong> leadership on this issue and does notleave it to global institutions which are provinginadequate in this regard.Action plan for change 147
■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FORCE REPORTDomestic wildlife crime1. The wildlife crime bureau must be set upimmediately, based on <strong>the</strong> modificationssuggested in <strong>the</strong> report:a. At <strong>the</strong> central level, a strong bureau is neededwith a capacity to develop a country-widedatabase <strong>of</strong> wildlife crime to enablecoordination, investigation and legal followup.b. At <strong>the</strong> state level, <strong>the</strong>re must be a node <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>wildlife crime bureau with <strong>the</strong> capacity toboth investigate and to follow up on <strong>the</strong>crime.c. The Central Bureau <strong>of</strong> Investigation (CBI) mustbe given <strong>the</strong> responsibility to investigateorganised wildlife crime and to take overcharge <strong>of</strong> certain special cases, for instance,<strong>the</strong> Sansar Chand case.d Regional forensic facilities must be set up toinvestigate wildlife specimens and <strong>the</strong>evidence in wildlife crime.e. The wildlife crime bureau must be made astatutory body under <strong>the</strong> Wildlife (Protection)Act, 1972 to make it effective and give itautonomy.2. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 should beammended as suggested in <strong>the</strong> report, so that <strong>the</strong>provisions related to crime are tightened andmade more stringent, particularly for designatedcritically endangered species. This will providefor deterrence for criminal actions against <strong>the</strong>sespecies and result in speedier trials.Innovative protection1. Identify <strong>the</strong> major hunting tribes and communitiesin proximity to, or operating in, a reserve. Eachpark authority must work to develop plans to use<strong>the</strong> expertise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se hunters for protection as wellas for ga<strong>the</strong>ring basic ecological information.2. The independent monitoring <strong>of</strong> each park mustevaluate <strong>the</strong> work done by <strong>the</strong> park managementon working with its forest-dependent traditionalhunting communities. The park management andProject <strong>Tiger</strong> must work on locale-specificapproaches with <strong>the</strong>se communities. These effortsshould be supported and carefully monitored, sothat <strong>the</strong> learning can be disseminated and canbecome practice.The science1. The <strong>Tiger</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong> has reviewed <strong>the</strong> revisedmethodology proposed by <strong>the</strong> Project <strong>Tiger</strong>directorate and <strong>the</strong> Wildlife Institute <strong>of</strong> India forestimating/monitoring tiger status and its habitat,and endorses <strong>the</strong> approach. It hopes that <strong>the</strong>national tiger estimation, which is to beconducted from November 2005, will be doneusing this evolved methodology.2. The Project <strong>Tiger</strong> directorate must set up ascientific expert group immediately wi<strong>the</strong>xpertise in relevant technical disciplines foroverseeing <strong>the</strong> process. This group should workfrom <strong>the</strong> very inception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process and assistin suggesting appropriate ways <strong>of</strong> analysing andinterpreting <strong>the</strong> data.3. All efforts should be made to encourage andfacilitate intensive research and monitoringstudies <strong>of</strong> source population <strong>of</strong> tigers using avariety <strong>of</strong> tools — photo-identification andmonitoring, camera traps, radio-telemetry and DNAbasedgenetic studies in different landscape units.4. The work in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> molecular techniques forestimation needs to be supported. Encourage <strong>the</strong>Wildlife Institute <strong>of</strong> India and <strong>the</strong> Centre forCellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) to take onpilot programmes at a landscape level using thistechnique. The CCMB should be asked to provideinputs in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> moleculartechniques for identification <strong>of</strong> individual tigers.5. The inclusive, open approach that we advocatedepends crucially on free access to allinformation, except where very evident securityconcerns are involved. In modern times, thiswould be best ensured by posting all pertinentinformation on <strong>the</strong> Web, in English as well as inall Indian languages.148 Action plan for change