Report of the Tiger Task Force - PRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE DOTS ■socio-economic research that has been conducted;b. Their process of updation must include open discussions with the local communities,local NGOs and researchers;c. The proposed reserve-level management committees must be asked to scrutinise thedetails of these plans;d. The plans must be put in the public domain and be used for the independentevaluation of the reserve.The Project Tiger directorate must work with chief wildlife wardens and all field directorsto set up and implement this process.5. The independent audit of each tiger reserve is potentially a vital tool for decisionmaking. This audit can to be used to create a reputational advantage for the reserve. Inorder to do this, the Task Force would recommend:a. Project Tiger directorate should work to further improve its criterion and indicatorsfor the rating. The criterion must be done to benchmark the progress and problems inall critical areas and set targets for its improvement.b. The rating should then be used for management decisions and for creating aninformed and involved public opinion on the working of individual reserves.c. It must be used to inform Parliament of the progress being made in tiger conservationand the challenges ahead.But this will only be possible if the process has credibility and independence. To do this,the findings of the independent audit must be put in the public domain. The peers andcritics are the best auditors and insurers of quality.6. The Tiger Task Force strongly feels that the most serious lacuna in the existingapproach to managing information on tigers has been a lack of openness and willingnessto take everybody along. The inclusive, open approach that the Task Force advocatesdepends crucially on free access to all information for all people, except where veryevident security concerns are involved. In modern times, this would be best ensured byposting all such information on the Web, in English, as well as in all Indian languages.The way ahead 87
■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT3.7 The relocation agendaWildlife conservationists say it is necessary to createinviolate spaces for the tiger. They state that Indiamust be prepared to set aside this land — 37,761 sqkm of tiger reserves, which, they say, is barely 1 percent of the country’s land area — for this flagshipspecies to breed and roam in.This is clearly not unreasonable. After all, tigerreserves have been designated with this distinctpurpose in mind. When they were created in the1970s, the international agency assisting thegovernment had said that it was necessary for thetiger “to have large areas of at least 2,000 sq km withsimilar contiguous areas so that a viable populationof about 300 tigers in each area could bemaintained”. The task force chaired by Karan Singhthen went on to investigate the feasibility of thisproposal, but found that it could not locate manyareas as large as 2,000 sq km, which could be‘reserved’ for tiger conservation. It, therefore,decided to adopt an approach in which smallerreserves would be created as model parks to preservethe tiger, while much more would be done to buildpublic opinion in favour of wildlife preservation andso secure larger areas for protection. 1Even when the first eight tiger reserves wereselected in different ecological systems, the taskforce noted that each reserve had existing humanpressure — of grazing, resource use and commercialfelling. It then suggested a management plan thatwould involve restricting and minimising humanactivities within the reserves. The core of the reservewould be designated a national park, with no humanactivity, while the buffer area could sustain people.The plan was that people would be relocatedfrom the core areas of the tiger reserves, while theywould continue to co-exist in the buffer areas. Butthe problem has been that while Project Tiger isbased on a management plan, using concepts of coreand buffer, the law does not have this provision.While the concept of core-buffer is deployed foradministrative purposes of the reserve, the lawprovides for something else: two main categories ofprotected reserves — national parks and sanctuaries— and two categories of protected forests — reserveforests and protected forests.The tiger reserves in the country are a patchworkof these existing legal land uses. In many cases,where there were a large number of settlements,adjustments were made to exclude these areas fromthe core and to keep the area under the category ofeither a ‘sanctuary’ or a ‘reserve forest’. In fact, incertain cases, the core area of the tiger reserve doesnot have the legal protection a forested space getswhen it receives ‘national park’ status. It remains asanctuary, but its administrators have to manage it asa completely protected zone.The problem is that while there is an emphasison removing the biotic pressure that people bring tothe tiger’s habitat in most cases, there is littleempirical evidence of the nature of this impact andwhat can be done to manage or mitigate it, before theoption of relocation is considered. What isinteresting is that the architects of Project Tiger hadnoted, even then, that the “information on the effectsof villages and their occupants on surrounding areasis generally lacking”. In addition, it had pointed outthat the forest department considers that “poachingby villagers in the reserves is spasmodic and its effectis negligible. Villagers are undoubtedly a fire hazard,but they are also available to assist in extinguishingserious fires”.But as villagers would impact the habitat overtime, that task force said it was desirable that smallpockets of forest villages should be shifted. In casethis was not possible, then, at the very least, cattlethat are a menace to forests should be diverted toalternative sites. In case people were angry becausetheir cattle were killed by tigers and were resortingto retaliatory poisoning, the task force said thatcompensation should be paid urgently.Since then, more reserves have been created. Theprinciple followed is the same: absolute protectionfor the core and human activity geared towardsconservation in the buffer.But unfortunately, 30 years hence, this picture isfar from perfect. In fact, matters have become muchworse. People continue to live in the core as well asthe buffer areas of the reserves. There has beeninadequate work done to relocate settlements and, inthe meantime, poverty and destitution has drivenmore people into the reserves. Authorities maintainthat according to the plan, these people are notallowed to use forest resources, first in the core andnow even in the buffer areas. People live there, sothey do use the resources; but this use is illegal. Theauthorities say that people should not be living in thereserves, as per the management plan for the reserve,which has demarcated areas as core and buffer, sothere is no question of providing developmentassistance or even compensation for cattle kills.There is escalating and deadly tension between thepeople and the park because of all this. At the end ofit, the tiger and the people are both losing.The issue, then, is to review what has been done88 The way ahead
Page 2 and 3:
THE REPORT OF THE TIGER TASK FORCEJ
Page 4 and 5:
ContentsIntroductionExecutive summa
Page 6 and 7:
IntroductionThe Tiger Task Force wa
Page 8 and 9:
TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE
Page 10 and 11:
Page 13:
■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FOR
Page 16:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 52: TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE
Page 59 and 60: ■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FOR
Page 67: ■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FOR
Page 70 and 71: TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE
Page 91 and 92: Wildlife research has been facing s
Page 97: ■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FOR
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
04Action plan for changeKey recomme
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
05References
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217:
show all

Report of the Tiger Task Force - PRS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?