TIGER TASK FORCE REPORT JOINING THE DOTS ■identify o<strong>the</strong>r candidates. The first rangers beganpatrolling and submitting monthly survey andintelligence reports in July 2000.Recruitment focused on men known to hunttigers, some more actively than o<strong>the</strong>rs. In severalcases, men who had recently been caught huntingtigers were recruited into <strong>the</strong> programme, instead <strong>of</strong>being prosecuted under <strong>the</strong> relatively weak forestryregulations.The programme staff carries out regularmonitoring patrols in key unprotected tiger habitats,and collects valuable data on tiger (and o<strong>the</strong>rwildlife) poaching and trade. The staff meetsfrequently with provincial, district and village level<strong>of</strong>ficials, as well as military personnel.The rangers, it is reported, normally operate inteams and carry a Global Positioning System device.Regional coordinators download <strong>the</strong> device’smonthly readings to verify ranger patrols. Data isreported to Phnom Penh in monthly narrativesummaries and Global Positioning System datapoints are entered into a Geographical InformationSystems-based system. The survey results aresummarised according to <strong>the</strong> three regions, andillustrated with maps prepared from <strong>the</strong> GlobalPositioning System data <strong>the</strong> ranger teams ga<strong>the</strong>redand that <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong>fice staff compiled.The project has identified several groups <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional hunters and wildlife traders, brought<strong>the</strong>ir activities to <strong>the</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevantauthorities and negotiated contracts with <strong>the</strong>m tostop hunting and trading.Has it worked?The promoters <strong>of</strong> this approach say that it has turneda number <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional tiger poachers into assets. 4The hunter-rangers have provided valuableintelligence about tiger poaching and o<strong>the</strong>r wildlifehunting and trade. In December 2001, a major tigerand elephant poaching gang was uncovered with <strong>the</strong>help <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se rangers.The approach, if illegal hunting is discovered, isto have <strong>the</strong> rangers and staff negotiate no-huntingcontracts with <strong>the</strong> poachers. These negotiations areconducted in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> district and police<strong>of</strong>ficials and carry a good deal <strong>of</strong> weight. Thisprocedure is equivalent to a stern warning, and, s<strong>of</strong>ar, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people who have signed suchcontracts with <strong>the</strong> project have been caught poachingagain, says <strong>the</strong> report.The project proponents and <strong>the</strong>ir reports recordthat poaching has reduced in Cambodia since <strong>the</strong>1990s 5 , but whe<strong>the</strong>r this merely correlates with <strong>the</strong>programme or is actually a consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>programme is something <strong>the</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong> has beenunable to gauge from a distance. But <strong>the</strong> fact is that<strong>the</strong> programme has used innovative methods andbrought new skills to people who used to bepoachers. It has worked at a low-cost option <strong>of</strong> localhiring, and intelligently deployed <strong>the</strong>m for surveysand patrolling.Namdapha: can hunter-tribes be protectors?The reserves in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern states <strong>of</strong> India arevast and inaccessible, low on staff and high on localcontrol. One conservation option here, as elsewhere,is to spread a security blanket around a reserve andprotect it with hard action. This model has beensuccessfully tried in Kaziranga national park, Assam,where a low intensity war has been fought betweeninsurgents and poachers versus <strong>the</strong> government for aperiod. But even here, <strong>the</strong> park authorities and <strong>the</strong>government have worked on reconciling localinterests in protection. But <strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r reserveswhere this protection model is not feasible. What,<strong>the</strong>n, are <strong>the</strong> options?The 2,000 sq km Namdapha tiger reserve islocated in Changlang district, <strong>the</strong> eastern-most part<strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh. It was declared a reserve forestin 1970 under <strong>the</strong> Assam Forest Regulation Act, 1891(first proposed in 1947), and subsequently a wildlifesanctuary in 1972. It was finally declared a nationalpark in May 1983; two months before, it wasdeclared a tiger reserve. In 1986, a 177 sq km area <strong>of</strong>reserve forest was added to <strong>the</strong> tiger reserve and isdesignated as <strong>the</strong> buffer zone, while <strong>the</strong> rest (1,808 sqkm) is considered <strong>the</strong> core zone.The area has a wide altitudinal range, from 200 mto over 4,500 m. The terrain is steep and inaccessible.The old 157 km Miao-Vijaynagar road runs through<strong>the</strong> park, though it is motorable only for 26 km up toa settlement called Deban. The park headquarter is atMiao township, with a single functioning range inDeban. Civil supplies to villages located outside <strong>the</strong>WWF: NGO monitoring networkIn <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s, <strong>the</strong> WWF-India had developed aprogramme for mobilising grassroot support in<strong>the</strong> tiger range areas. This was done through <strong>the</strong>creation <strong>of</strong> a NGO monitoring network with <strong>the</strong>following objectives;a. To develop an advance warning, threat alertmechanism for safeguarding <strong>the</strong> protectedareas;b. To mobilise grassroot NGOs and o<strong>the</strong>rcommitted field based groups who are focalpoints <strong>of</strong> this network, for elicitingparticipation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local people in activitiessuch as ecodevelopment as well as forprotected areas management. 6The way ahead 65
■ JOINING THE DOTS TIGER TASK FORCE REPORTeastern boundary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> park are carried on foot or onelephant back through <strong>the</strong> park, mostly along <strong>the</strong>river and parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> road. Access for tourists, andeven park authorities and biologists, is mostlyrestricted to areas up to 900 m. The interior andhigher areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> park remain unexplored, exceptby hunters from local communities. 7Local communities: <strong>the</strong> ones who knowThe only ones who really know <strong>the</strong> forest, <strong>the</strong>refore,are <strong>the</strong> local communities that walk <strong>the</strong> forest forhunting and survival. Aparajita Dutta, a wildlifebiologist with Nature Conservation Foundation (NCF),a Mysore-based NGO, has been studying <strong>the</strong> region fora while, and believes that hunting pressures on <strong>the</strong>region are extreme and it is only <strong>the</strong>se huntingcommunities in <strong>the</strong> region that really know <strong>the</strong>forest.The region is home to several indigenous tribes.Beyond <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern boundary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> park (at 80mile) are 13 villages with 673 households and apopulation <strong>of</strong> 5,147. There are four Lisu villages inVijaynagar circle — <strong>the</strong>se adjoin <strong>the</strong> park and have403 households (population 2,600) — and nine o<strong>the</strong>rvillages <strong>of</strong> Nepali ex-servicemen with a population <strong>of</strong>about 2,018; <strong>the</strong>se ex-servicemen had been settledhere by <strong>the</strong> government after 1962. Apart from this,<strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r tribal and non-tribal governmentdepartment staff and personnel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Assam Riflesand <strong>the</strong> Indian Air <strong>Force</strong>. 8The Lisu, also referred to as Yobin by somecommunities, are agriculturalists and also have areputation <strong>of</strong> being skilled hunter-ga<strong>the</strong>rers. There isstrong resentment, anger, and mistrust against <strong>the</strong>forest department among most Lisu. Their biggestgrievance is that <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> park anddemarcation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boundary in 1983 was carried outwithout any consultation with <strong>the</strong>m, and <strong>the</strong>re wasno settlement <strong>of</strong> rights. Many insist that <strong>the</strong> areabetween Deban and Gandhigram is <strong>the</strong>ir area andthat <strong>the</strong>y had no idea when <strong>the</strong> national park wascreated. For instance, most Lisu believe that <strong>the</strong>biggest hurdle to building <strong>the</strong> arterial road (which<strong>the</strong>y see as crucial to <strong>the</strong>ir development) has been <strong>the</strong>forest department — it was responsible for stoppingroad repair and maintenance in 2000. There is alsoresentment as <strong>the</strong>y believe <strong>the</strong> forest department hasportrayed <strong>the</strong> Lisu as “illegal settlers who haveencroached <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserve from across <strong>the</strong>international border <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country”.The field staff strength in Namdapha is very lowand <strong>the</strong>y are not trained or motivated; given <strong>the</strong> pooraccessibility, patrolling by <strong>the</strong> department isrestricted to <strong>the</strong> fringe areas. There are merely 22sanctioned posts <strong>of</strong> forest guards to manage andprotect 1,985 sq km. Of <strong>the</strong>se 22 posts, only 11 arefilled. This effectively means one person per 180 sqkm. In contrast, Kaziranga national park in Assam, amodel <strong>of</strong> successful protection through enforcement,has 500 forest guards for 800 sq km (one guard per1.6 sq km) on flat lowland terrain with numerousranges, beats and forest camps. In Namdapha, <strong>the</strong>reis a complete lack <strong>of</strong> basic facilities and <strong>of</strong> supportfrom local police and administration. Most staff areoutsiders; not a single Lisu is currently employed in<strong>the</strong> department. 9 The headquarters in Miao is 10 kmfrom <strong>the</strong> park boundary with a single range at Deban.Currently, no staff is posted at some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accessibletemporary camps. Even to patrol this relativelyaccessible area, <strong>the</strong> staff depends on boats to cross<strong>the</strong> river and rations have to be carried <strong>the</strong>re. Oftenduring <strong>the</strong> monsoon when <strong>the</strong> river is in spate, it isdangerous to use <strong>the</strong> boats and staff has beenstranded on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side for days with no food. In<strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> regular staff presence and patrolling,hunters <strong>of</strong>ten use <strong>the</strong>se forest camps.The crisis…Consequently, <strong>the</strong> park is in a state <strong>of</strong> crisis.Researchers believe tigers have all but disappearedfrom <strong>the</strong> reserve, though information remainsunverified. Hunting continues unabated and aresilient and enterprising community turneddestitute and desperate by <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parklooks upon <strong>the</strong> ‘park’ (not <strong>the</strong> forest) with animosity.At present, <strong>the</strong>re is a stalemate. The state is unable toincrease <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> staff.Even if <strong>the</strong> forest department does get additionalresources, it will be handicapped without knowledge<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> park. The immediate need to ensure wildlifeconservation in Namdapha is protection fromhunting, fishing and o<strong>the</strong>r kinds <strong>of</strong> disturbance.…and its solutionMost Lisu today view <strong>the</strong> park as <strong>the</strong> biggest barrierto <strong>the</strong>ir aspirations and <strong>the</strong> root <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>ir problems.They are bearing all <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> conservation. Theyhave poor relations with <strong>the</strong> department, whichsometimes result in retaliatory hunting, and thisneeds to be remedied through dialogue and bettercommunication. However, if <strong>the</strong>y can get tangiblebenefits, <strong>the</strong>re could be a positive attitudinal change.A solution to <strong>the</strong> agricultural land problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Lisu is also urgently required to stop <strong>the</strong> influx <strong>of</strong>Lisu families settling inside <strong>the</strong> park. A realisticrelocation/resettlement plan has to be made inconsultation with and <strong>the</strong> agreement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lisu.There is a need to find alternate employment optionsand opportunities for <strong>the</strong> Lisu, some <strong>of</strong> which (suchas eco-tourism) could be tied to <strong>the</strong> national park.The Lisu community’s support for <strong>the</strong> park would goa long way in ensuring wildlife conservation as <strong>the</strong>ycan <strong>the</strong>mselves work ei<strong>the</strong>r directly as guards andinformers (about hunting activity) in <strong>the</strong> forest66 The way ahead