Plant 44 Audit Reports - Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYKelly MarionRSC (cont'd)Ken MatymkaRichard KennedyRick JohnsonJeff GeorgeDCMAMichael MessinaLorna TaylorJames MagnanFire DepartmentFire DepartmentFire DepartmentFire DepartmentFire DepartmentPropertyPropertyACO6. DISCUSSIONS AND FINDINGS:a. The Facilities Review began with an in-brief between the team members andRaytheon Company personnel. The briefing consisted of progress status on past findings,new objectives, and the week's agenda. Raytheon presented a briefing on their progressin closing last years findings.b. All team members were assigned to one of four teams including the appropriateRaytheon counterpart. The tentative schedule was agreed upon and the team wasprovided with a conference room so that we could convene at the end ofeach day. Eachteam was also assigned with a person and camera to take photographs of facilities andareas identified for an action.c. The findings and the information contained within this report were briefed toRaytheon on Thursday, 7 February 2008.7. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:a. The efforts of Raytheon to correct problems is commendable, however there arestill areas that require improvement. In general the plant presents a good appearance, thehousekeeping is adequate and the plant provides a safe, productive working environment.b. Team members conducted their own independent reviews. The results, findings, andrecommendations are provided in the following attachments: Normal Maintenance(Attachment 1), Industrial Hygiene (Attachment 2), Fire Department Operations Evaluation(Attachment 3) and Fire Protection (Attachment 4). The Industrial Safety and WeaponsSafety evaluations were not conducted concurrently with the Annual Facil ities Review thisyear. The ASC Safety Office will conduct separate reviews later in the year.c. Raytheon personnel were cooperative, helpful, and supportive during this year'sannual facilities review.